Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Available Boeing number ranges

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Available Boeing number ranges

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2010, 12:48 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,452
Available Boeing number ranges

Boeing 4xx is taken, they include Boeing 464.
Boeing 5xx is reserved for turbines.
Boeing 6xx is missiles.
Boeing 9xx is in use as well, including Boeing 953 (a jet), Boeing 901 (a tiltrotor) and Boeing 929 (a ship).

Has there been any Boeing 8xx yet, or is the range reserved for anything?
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 7:39 pm
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
After the 797, they will probably go with 7107, as in seven ten seven, then 7117, 7127, 7137, etc.
PhlyingRPh is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 7:47 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Texas
Programs: Many, slipping beneath the horizon
Posts: 9,859
Originally Posted by chornedsnorkack
Boeing 4xx is taken, they include Boeing 464.
Boeing 5xx is reserved for turbines.
Boeing 6xx is missiles.
Boeing 9xx is in use as well, including Boeing 953 (a jet), Boeing 901 (a tiltrotor) and Boeing 929 (a ship).

Has there been any Boeing 8xx yet, or is the range reserved for anything?
Boeing "2" series occupied by the 1930s era 247 designed to compete with the Douglas "DC"s, the DC-2 & 3. It didn't quite make the grade, carrying only 10 or so (the original DC-2, 14 IIRC). DC-3 upped the stakes to 21.

As for the "3" series, there was the 307 Stratoliner, only 10 built, a contemporary and sharing much of the wing and powerplant layout of the B-17 "Flying Fortress. The 377 Stratocruiser (USAF C-97, KC-97) shared design and much of the platform of the B-29, with an unusual "Double Bubble" fuselage and pressurization. It soldiered on in civilian colors as the first of the refuselaged "Guppy" and "SuperGuppy" freight carriers well into the 90s.
The 314 was the legendary "Clipper' 4 engine seaplanr, while the little known designation, 367, went to DC-8 variants after the McDD merger, a la the "717" renaming of the MD80 series.
TMOliver is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 10:14 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: Enough to travel better
Posts: 2,020
Some thoughts here:

Yes, the 717 was a renamed MD-95.

I thought there was also an R&D version of a Boeing 2707, which was supposed to be a supersonic transport (SST).

I rode a Boeing 929 "Jetfoil", which was a turbine powered hydrofoil that was operating in Hawaii for 2 years in the 1970s.
tonywestsider is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2010, 11:26 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,452
Originally Posted by TMOliver
Boeing "2" series occupied by the 1930s era 247 designed to compete with the Douglas "DC"s, the DC-2 & 3. It didn't quite make the grade, carrying only 10 or so (the original DC-2, 14 IIRC). DC-3 upped the stakes to 21.
Counting letters as well as numbers, there has indeed been Boeing 8XX, as I found. Boeing 80 is a biplane with 3 Wasp engines - and the derivative with Hornet engines is Boeing 80A. And a private version is Boeing 226.
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2010, 11:39 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East Ester, Alaska
Programs: Alaska Million Miler, United Million Miler, Wyndham Rewards Diamond, Choice Hotels Diamond
Posts: 12,145
Originally Posted by tonywestsider
Some thoughts here:

Yes, the 717 was a renamed MD-95.
Actually, quite the opposite is true. The MD-95 was developed by McDonnell Douglas as yet another variant of the DC-9 family. When Boeing took over McDonnell Douglas, that airplane was redignated the Boeing 717. The designation "717" was once considered for the smaller, shorter range version of the 707 that went on to become the Boeing 720.
Seat 2A is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2010, 12:15 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Programs: I miss NW, TW
Posts: 4,828
Originally Posted by PhlyingRPh
After the 797, they will probably go with 7107, as in seven ten seven, then 7117, 7127, 7137, etc.
I thought they might go with the 909, 929, etc. but that will not be the case because mainland China is launching the 919.

I think the 7 number is preferred. 2707 may be unluckly since the SST named the 2707 was cancelled after Nixon cut off aid.

I'm guessing letters, like the 7E7.

Maybe we'll have the 7A7, 7B7, etc. Later, they might skip numbers so the largest plane will be the 7Y7 and the smallest the 7F7, just like they skipped numbers to have the 747-8 (almost sounds like the -800 and 747-500 and -600 and -700 were skipped).

The 747SP should have been the 747-300SP and the -400 should have been the -500.
Penbank is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2010, 12:26 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: WAS
Posts: 3,006
Originally Posted by TWA A380
Maybe we'll have the 7A7, 7B7, etc. Later, they might skip numbers so the largest plane will be the 7Y7 and the smallest the 7F7, just like they skipped numbers to have the 747-8 (almost sounds like the -800 and 747-500 and -600 and -700 were skipped).
I thought I read somewhere that Boeing chose 747-8 to to along with the 787.
cmn.jcs is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2010, 12:38 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Programs: UA/CO(1K-PLT), AA(PLT), QR, EK, Marriott(PLT), Hilton(DMND)
Posts: 9,538
Originally Posted by TWA A380
The 747SP should have been the 747-300SP and the -400 should have been the -500.
Agreed.
Another nomenclature oddity was the Boeing 720B, the shorter, stubbier version of the Boeing 707.
PhlyingRPh is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2010, 10:55 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Programs: Enough to travel better
Posts: 2,020
Originally Posted by Seat 2A
Actually, quite the opposite is true. The MD-95 was developed by McDonnell Douglas as yet another variant of the DC-9 family. When Boeing took over McDonnell Douglas, that airplane was redignated the Boeing 717. The designation "717" was once considered for the smaller, shorter range version of the 707 that went on to become the Boeing 720.
Thank you. What I meant to say was that the MD-95 was renamed the Boeing 717 after Boeing's purchase of MD.
tonywestsider is offline  
Old Dec 18, 2010, 12:34 am
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,452
Originally Posted by TWA A380
I thought they might go with the 909, 929, etc. but that will not be the case because mainland China is launching the 919.
But remember that Boeing 929 is also in use.
chornedsnorkack is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.