First/Business Class: Should there be age restrictions?
#61
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,233
I suggest we should have, as the old Irish blessing says, "the serenity to accept the things we cannot change, the courage to change the things we can change, and the wisdom to know the difference." What is at issue here is the serenity part. A bit more of it, whether sealed into an aluminum tube with a crying child or in any other situation, will help us all get along.
#62
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Oxford, Mississippi
Programs: Delta Silver thanks to Million Miles; Choice Plat., point scrounger everywhere
Posts: 1,595
Is the thought of someone in a wheelchair boarding before a so-called Elite really such a problem?
I have a relative who is wheelchair bound and I assure you she would gladly swap her early boarding privileges on aircraft and Disneyland with you if you'd take the hand she has been dealt.
I have a relative who is wheelchair bound and I assure you she would gladly swap her early boarding privileges on aircraft and Disneyland with you if you'd take the hand she has been dealt.
#63
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: MEL
Programs: QF, VA, VN, BA, SQ, KC - all reds and blues.
Posts: 3,205
This is undoubtedly true, but the issue is that airlines pretty much advertise the unattainable concept of complete comfort, peace and perfection in their premium cabins. It's understandable therefore that people are disappointed when the reality doesn't meet those expectations. Whether or not children should be banned from premium cabins is academic; it's not going to happen. The real question is whether airlines are entirely honest about the product that they are selling (at a very high price, I might add).
#64
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
This is undoubtedly true, but the issue is that airlines pretty much advertise the unattainable concept of complete comfort, peace and perfection in their premium cabins. It's understandable therefore that people are disappointed when the reality doesn't meet those expectations. Whether or not children should be banned from premium cabins is academic; it's not going to happen. The real question is whether airlines are entirely honest about the product that they are selling (at a very high price, I might add).
#65
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
#66
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PDX
Programs: DL, UA, AA, BA, AS, SPG, MR, IHG, PC
Posts: 862
#67
Delta747
#68
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 634
I agree that there should be an age restriction but some exceptions because if you are raised well and have good manners then you should be able to fly business, but then if not well behaved then you shouldn't be able to. I started flying J when I was 5 (MSP-AMS 747 Upper Deck).Delta747
#69
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 3,682
Last month, I went to a modern dance recital. Before the show, I saw a couple with an infant-the baby couldn't have been more than 2 months old, if that. The lights went down, the modern (read: non-soothing) music began and the baby screamed. Mom took the baby out of the theater for the rest of the show, so other than ruining the opening 2 minutes for everyone, no harm.
What happened in that case was a couple deciding that their right (clear and legal) to take an infant into the theater trumped everyone else's right to enjoy the show as the choreographer and director intended. There were no Irish proverbs during the recital.
Small kids don't know or care if they are in coach or business. Rather it is the parents' desire to enjoy upgraded service that results in kids in business and first. They are putting their right to book business for their small kids ahead of the right of the other passengers to enjoy an adult experience. On a plane, however, you can't just take the child and step outside.
It would be nice if all parents were like the one who posted above, who seems to book C with a careful eye to her kids' likely behavior, and with a concern for other passengers. Well dream on-they aren't. And the airlines are not going to referee this one either, any more than they do gate lice and overhead bag space poachers.
What happened in that case was a couple deciding that their right (clear and legal) to take an infant into the theater trumped everyone else's right to enjoy the show as the choreographer and director intended. There were no Irish proverbs during the recital.
Small kids don't know or care if they are in coach or business. Rather it is the parents' desire to enjoy upgraded service that results in kids in business and first. They are putting their right to book business for their small kids ahead of the right of the other passengers to enjoy an adult experience. On a plane, however, you can't just take the child and step outside.
It would be nice if all parents were like the one who posted above, who seems to book C with a careful eye to her kids' likely behavior, and with a concern for other passengers. Well dream on-they aren't. And the airlines are not going to referee this one either, any more than they do gate lice and overhead bag space poachers.
#74
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PDX
Programs: DL, UA, AA, BA, AS, SPG, MR, IHG, PC
Posts: 862
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719