Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 6, 09, 5:01 pm   #31
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 1,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seat 2A View Post
A good point of terminology is made here. As one who spent some years working in the industry, here are the original definitions:

Nonstop: A flight that flies nonstop from one airport to another

Direct: A flight that makes stops enroute but with no change of planes
Interestingly, I'm a direct flight on Thursday - First one I've been on in years.

PHL -> YVR, via ORD. Same flight # the whole way, no change of plane.
gglave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 09, 9:02 pm   #32
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Programs: AA EXP, QF Plat, UA 1K, CO Plt, China Southern Gld, VS Gld, SPG Plt, IC Plt Amb, Hilton Gld
Posts: 47
There is also potentially a difference in longest between time (hours) and distance (number of miles). In terms of direct as opposed to nonstop some candidates: SQ 61 - Houston - Singapore (23:10), QF 108 - New York - Sydney (22:55). United has some long ones: UA 881 - Chicago-Bangkok (22:42), UA 897 - Washington - Beijing (20:52) is getting up there too, UA 895 Chicago - Singapore (21:29). If it is not starting from the US, they can be longer: NZ 1 LHR-Auckland is timed at 26:20.

SQ21 EWR-SIN is a mere 19 hours. But if you want to enjoy a long stretch in economy, CO 99 EWR-HKG is the one to beat.
ghfatw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 09, 1:48 am   #33
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chennai, India
Programs: American exec platinum, marriot platinum, radisson gold
Posts: 4
ORD - DEL is only 15 odd hours. newark - singapore is 18 odd hours. I flew that flight on economy (before it was all business class). i would have to commend singapore airlines for making even such a long economy flight comfortable. guess they are one of a kind.
fanofflying is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 09, 1:21 pm   #34
Moderator: Singapore Airlines KrisFlyer, oneworld & Travel Safety/Security
I Voted
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: hopefully travelling
Posts: 48,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyleo View Post
Correct. Is that flight still business-class only? It used to have a Premium Economy, Biz, and F class before the reconfiguration.
EWR-SIN was launched with executive economy and executive busines. No first. Since then it has been changed to all (new) business.
Kiwi Flyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 09, 3:52 pm   #35
I Voted
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: AA, CO Gold, UA 1K, IC RA, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,981
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiwi Flyer View Post
EWR-SIN was launched with executive economy and executive busines. No first. Since then it has been changed to all (new) business.
Are you sure it was launched with executive business?
Always thought it was launched with Raffles.
__________________
I'm reading FT on Friday night because I have 6AM flight on Saturday morning...
kkjay77 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 09, 5:04 pm   #36
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: LIS (home is still SFO)
Programs: DL GM, UA 1K, WN
Posts: 2,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by gglave View Post
Interestingly, I'm a direct flight on Thursday - First one I've been on in years.

PHL -> YVR, via ORD. Same flight # the whole way, no change of plane.
Why are you sure there's no change of plane?
__________________
2008 Flight Stats: BIS miles: 106,912 (+19,718 over 2007)
Hours: 229:16 (+14:05) Segts:46 (-22) Airlines:8 (+0, +4 new)
Palal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 09, 10:55 pm   #37
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Programs: UA 1P, AA, Hilton Honors
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyleo View Post
I've seen that. What's the point? Sounds like a marketing scam, I mean, strategy.
Yes. I don't know how true this is now, but it used to be that on many booking sights direct flights (because they looked like nonstop) came up before connecting flights and passengers were far more likely to book them.
u2fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 09, 7:58 am   #38
TalkBoard Candidate/09
I Voted
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 9,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seat 2A View Post
There's a reason why the term "Nonstop" has ever been used. Otherwise, all flights would be "direct".
This reminds me of a passenger who refused to fly on a non-stop flight we offered, preferring instead a 1-stop flight. When asked why, she said that she didn't want to have to parachute out of the plane. Evidently, she believed that the "non-stop" flight would not actually land but the passengers would have to jump out when overhead the destination!!!
B747-437B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 09, 1:12 am   #39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: DL Silver Medallion (again)
Posts: 11,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Palal View Post
Why are you sure there's no change of plane?
Yes, I'm pretty sure that I flown one-stop by same aircraft out PHX-SLC-FLL. I remember where I took DL flight by years ago in earlier 2008 right after the holidays season is over. I didn't have to take the carryon bags out of the aircraft in SLC. This is where I have to put back in economy class for next segment. That's why where my carryon bags is leave behind inside the aircraft but, there is no need to change the aircraft. I have to reboarding into the same aircraft. I have to get off the aircraft where I have to stay at the gate area for next flight out SLC-FLL nonstop.
__________________
I will try to concentrate with English. Thanks!
2009 Travel: DL 18836 MQMs
N830MH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 09, 5:07 am   #40
FlyerTalk Evangelist
I Voted
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ANC, MRI
Programs: AS MVP Gold (83K), AS BR [3 year renewal], Maika`i Card, CO
Posts: 11,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by B747-437B View Post
This reminds me of a passenger who refused to fly on a non-stop flight we offered, preferring instead a 1-stop flight. When asked why, she said that she didn't want to have to parachute out of the plane. Evidently, she believed that the "non-stop" flight would not actually land but the passengers would have to jump out when overhead the destination!!!
That made me chuckle...

Now AS does have (as previously mentioned) a milkrun where the A/C stops on a couple landing strips mostly to offload cargo, but also the occasional pax on their 73Q... Not certain if its exactly each one of these cities (might have added one or two)... but ANC-CDV-YAK-JNU-SIT-PSG-WRG-KTN-SEA
__________________
beckoa is online now   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:53 am.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0