Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 2, 09, 9:59 pm   #1
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
Is the way seat pitch defined misleading?

Maybe I am looking into this wrong. But for example, take a seat pitch of 30" from the bottom of the seatback to the exact same point on the seat in front of it. Yes that is 30" but there is a seatback between those 2 points. which has to be atleast 4" maybe more. So there really is only 26" of room. Does that make sense? I think most people would interpret 30" of seat pitch as 30" of room.
And it would also vary from airline to airline on how thick the seatback is. Again I could be wrong.
bsmooth1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 09, 11:20 pm   #2
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: n.y.c.
Posts: 6,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsmooth1 View Post
I think most people would interpret 30" of seat pitch as 30" of room.
You might interpret it that way if you've never been on a plane before. But otherwise, it should be pretty easy to realize that there is not/never was 2.5 feet of room between you and the seat in front.
nerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 6:49 am   #3
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ORD MDW
Programs: AA, UA, NW , PC Gold, SPG Gold, Avis PC
Posts: 4,807
I always thought this was measured from a fixed point on the floor where the seat mouints.
__________________
Bring back Ted airlines, I miss the moaning and complaining.
sobore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 9:36 am   #4
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: RR A-List
Posts: 3,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by sobore View Post
I always thought this was measured from a fixed point on the floor where the seat mouints.
It's measured from *ANY* point on one seat to the exact same point on the seat in the next row.
LarryJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 10:59 am   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Home
Programs: Virgin FC, Qantas, Golden Circle, Sofitel, Hyatt, Starwood, Nectar, and my Tesco Club Card
Posts: 823
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryJ View Post
It's measured from *ANY* point on one seat to the exact same point on the seat in the next row.
My understanding as well.

To the OP I guess that is why they come up with a term like Seat Pitch instead of Leg Room - what sounds better Seat Pitch 34" or leg room 14"?
__________________
Charge it to the Underhill's Account
Kettering Northants QC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 11:01 am   #6
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA USA
Posts: 3,955
Seat pitch is useful mostly as a comparison rather than an absolute. If one aircraft has a seat pitch of 30" and another has 33", then you will have about 3" more leg room on the 2nd plane compared with the first. I say "about" because the thickness of the seatback and shape of the seat can vary a little.
JerryFF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 12:26 pm   #7
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: LIS (home is still SFO)
Programs: DL GM, UA 1K, WN
Posts: 2,992
The only problem here is you're not comparing apples to apples when you look at seat-to-seat comparisons. Seat backs have different depths and a 34" on an older plane is worse than a 34" on a newer plane. Newer seats have less cushioning and offer more legroom when you consider the classic definition of seat pitch.
__________________
2008 Flight Stats: BIS miles: 106,912 (+19,718 over 2007)
Hours: 229:16 (+14:05) Segts:46 (-22) Airlines:8 (+0, +4 new)
Palal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 2:12 pm   #8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat (OW Sapphire), 2.75MM; bmi Gold (*A Gold)
Posts: 14,390
The word "pitch" (in this context; it has many other meanings) has meant the distance between two corresponding points of something for centuries. The gear pitch of a cogwheel is the distance between two corresponding points on adjacent teeth, for example. Airlines took an existing word, in common use in many fields, and applied it to seating without changing its meaning. It's not realistic, or even reasonable, to expect them to redefine it, especially when there are already perfectly good other terms such as "leg room" for the other measures a passenger might care about.

The reasons airlines publicize seat pitch, the largest of the available measures, rather than any of the smaller ones has to do with marketing, not terminology. Redefining words wouldn't help.
Efrem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 5:30 pm   #9
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR Plt, SPG Plt, HH GLD, US SLV, AA Gold,
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsmooth1 View Post
So there really is only 26" of room. Does that make sense? I think most people would interpret 30" of seat pitch as 30" of room.
Kind of like what the definition of "is" is. Regardless of how someone might interpret it, the definition of pitch (dot pitch, gear teeth pitch, etc.) is as defined.

Yes, with varying seatback widths, you could get different usable leg/armroom with the same pitch.

But since most seats are fairly standard thicknesses, the relative measurements are meaningful. 32" pitch will give you more room than 30" pitch, even if they are really only 28" and 26".
CPRich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 09, 6:25 pm   #10
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: OAK/SFO
Programs: UA 3P, US, AA, WN, TZ; HH, *W, MR, GP+ (non-elite on all)
Posts: 6,527
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPRich View Post
the definition of pitch (dot pitch, gear teeth pitch, etc.) is as defined.
With that, I agree. Pitch has a very standard definition. Moreover, it's also an independent property useful for the airlines - the pitch alone is what determines how many rows can fit in a given cabin configuration, independent of what the actual legroom may be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CPRich View Post
But since most seats are fairly standard thicknesses, the relative measurements are meaningful. 32" pitch will give you more room than 30" pitch, even if they are really only 28" and 26".
With that, I disagree. Newer seats (especially the very latest generation) are substantially thinner than old seats, many of which are still flying. Therefore, a 32" pitch with an old seat may give you the same, or even less, space than a 30" pitch with the newest generation of seats. This is why, for example, UA's upcoming 777 reconfiguration is rumored to reduce pitch but maintain legroom - because they are switching to newer, thinner seats.

I don't think that pitch is a misleading quantity - it has a very specific definition. However, pitch alone does not translate directly to legroom, without knowing the actual seat dimensions... and these can vary significantly depending on the seat make and model.
cepheid is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:22 pm.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0