Reactivation Issue: Microsoft Must Burn in Hell!
#32
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,036
I NEVER upgrade a Microsoft OS or Office. NEVER! The kind of nonsense you talk about here and the difficulties with upgrading that sometimes occur are not something I want to ask for. I keep each system with the OS and Office version that comes on it. When I buy a new system, I get the current OS. Apples on the other hand, I pretty routinely upgrade to the latest OSX version. So I basically wont play the game with Microsoft because of how they play it. It isnt much but they dont get anything from me for new software except when I buy new hardware.
#34
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 247
I NEVER upgrade a Microsoft OS or Office. NEVER! The kind of nonsense you talk about here and the difficulties with upgrading that sometimes occur are not something I want to ask for. I keep each system with the OS and Office version that comes on it. When I buy a new system, I get the current OS. Apples on the other hand, I pretty routinely upgrade to the latest OSX version. So I basically wont play the game with Microsoft because of how they play it. It isnt much but they dont get anything from me for new software except when I buy new hardware.
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Newport Beach, California, USA
Posts: 36,062
#36
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,036
#37
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
I don't know. Maybe you *are* a special case. Maybe you're part of that small group of computer users that truly can't use WINE or run alternatives to the programs that you're using, and aren't a large enough client to convince the developer to code it for a different OS. I guess all I can say is, "damn, that sucks; sorry I can't do a thing for you".
But I would venture to say there's a good number of people who run the same software you do who have the same frustrations. It may be that the time is now to band together and give the developers a piece of your (collective) mind. With software that specialized, I would think you wouldn't have to bring that big a group together to motivate the developer.
Of course, the whole lot of you might not have the time, money, or effort to spare. In which case, things will stay as they are. Oh well, it's not like things can get much worse...right?
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 37,486
Out of curiosity, when you turned the machine back on after installing the new nic, did you install the new NIC drivers BEFORE attempting to activate it?
I have a sneaking feeling that you turned it on and tried the activation before the new nic was correctly installed. It is (to me) the only way to describe the faliure of the activation wizard. If the machine can't contact the internet then it makes sense that the activation will fail.
I have a sneaking feeling that you turned it on and tried the activation before the new nic was correctly installed. It is (to me) the only way to describe the faliure of the activation wizard. If the machine can't contact the internet then it makes sense that the activation will fail.
#39
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Out of curiosity, when you turned the machine back on after installing the new nic, did you install the new NIC drivers BEFORE attempting to activate it?
I have a sneaking feeling that you turned it on and tried the activation before the new nic was correctly installed. It is (to me) the only way to describe the faliure of the activation wizard. If the machine can't contact the internet then it makes sense that the activation will fail.
I have a sneaking feeling that you turned it on and tried the activation before the new nic was correctly installed. It is (to me) the only way to describe the faliure of the activation wizard. If the machine can't contact the internet then it makes sense that the activation will fail.
#40
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
Changing a NIC triggers reactivation? That's absurd. I also agree with giving a phony name and phone number. Does the EULA require that you provide Microsoft accurate personal information?
--PP
#41
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
Others have a HASP key (USB dongle) that I don't think there's a cloning or emulation hack out for yet.
--PP
#42
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
--PP
#43
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 37,486
As for the EULA, it doesn't say the information has to be accurate, I think it has to be made clear that the request for information had NOTHING to do with the activation process.
Activating XP is an anonymous process and no information is required. The request for a name and number were made by the support department, to me it seems only reasonable that someone providing support over the phone knows a) who they are dealing with and b) who to call back if a call drops.
Providing this information to open a support case is the most normal thing in the world, but since it is Microsoft asking it I guess it is seen as the most terrible intrusion into someones private life and worthy of lawsuits.
I don't think any company will give tech support over the phone without at least knowing who they are dealing with. You can call yourself any name you want, but at least don't make those poor call center rep's life even more miserable by playing legal eagle on the phone with them, they are only there to help them. By not helping them with a simple request you invalidate IMHO the right to complain how long the call takes.
#44
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PHL
Posts: 165
Activating XP is an anonymous process and no information is required. The request for a name and number were made by the support department, to me it seems only reasonable that someone providing support over the phone knows a) who they are dealing with and b) who to call back if a call drops.
Providing this information to open a support case is the most normal thing in the world, but since it is Microsoft asking it I guess it is seen as the most terrible intrusion into someones private life and worthy of lawsuits.
I don't think any company will give tech support over the phone without at least knowing who they are dealing with. You can call yourself any name you want, but at least don't make those poor call center rep's life even more miserable by playing legal eagle on the phone with them, they are only there to help them. By not helping them with a simple request you invalidate IMHO the right to complain how long the call takes.
Providing this information to open a support case is the most normal thing in the world, but since it is Microsoft asking it I guess it is seen as the most terrible intrusion into someones private life and worthy of lawsuits.
I don't think any company will give tech support over the phone without at least knowing who they are dealing with. You can call yourself any name you want, but at least don't make those poor call center rep's life even more miserable by playing legal eagle on the phone with them, they are only there to help them. By not helping them with a simple request you invalidate IMHO the right to complain how long the call takes.
#45
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 37,486
When I've had a problem with the Activation Wizard, I've had to call the phone number that popped up on the screen and then punch in the code manually. I was never asked for personal info. Sounds like the OP just took the wrong route to get their problem solved. Going through the suport queue means that you're going to get treated like anyone else opening a support ticket, which means them asking for your name, phone # etc.