Rethinking checked luggage management
Oct 24, 2016, 9:17 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Programs: HH Diamond, AA LifeTime Plat, DL Plat, Amex Centurion, Hertz Plaitnum
Posts: 306
Rethinking checked luggage management
It baffles me to no end how in 2016, where so much amazing technology rule our lives, a solution to checking bags at the airport has not been created.
Yes, self tagging, and the e-tag make life a tad easier perhaps; but why in the world do we remain stuck at the airline 'giving us' a new tag each time we begin a trip?!
Their tag means, us having to keep paper receipts for each and every time we fly. It also means that when the tag rips or the bag gets lost, there is no way of ever connecting it back to its owner.
How is there no simple solution to checking bags at the airport? Why are we at their mercy? Who said they should 'tell us' what our bag tag details are, why shouldn't we tell them?!
Yes, self tagging, and the e-tag make life a tad easier perhaps; but why in the world do we remain stuck at the airline 'giving us' a new tag each time we begin a trip?!
Their tag means, us having to keep paper receipts for each and every time we fly. It also means that when the tag rips or the bag gets lost, there is no way of ever connecting it back to its owner.
How is there no simple solution to checking bags at the airport? Why are we at their mercy? Who said they should 'tell us' what our bag tag details are, why shouldn't we tell them?!
Oct 24, 2016, 9:38 pm
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,273
Oct 24, 2016, 9:49 pm
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Programs: HH Diamond, AA LifeTime Plat, DL Plat, Amex Centurion, Hertz Plaitnum
Posts: 306
The actual baggage check-in process is very year 1990.
Oct 24, 2016, 10:15 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 21,016
It is not urgent. Over dramatic me thinks
The airline tag /bar code identifies the bag and where it going. Only if every bag had a builtin e-tag would it help lost bags - missing tags
Qantas has permanent e-tags. Given to anyone with status or you can purchase http://www.qantas.com/travel/airline...-tag/global/en
From 2011 http://flyingwithfish.boardingarea.c...of-the-future/
The airline tag /bar code identifies the bag and where it going. Only if every bag had a builtin e-tag would it help lost bags - missing tags
Qantas has permanent e-tags. Given to anyone with status or you can purchase http://www.qantas.com/travel/airline...-tag/global/en
From 2011 http://flyingwithfish.boardingarea.c...of-the-future/
Last edited by Mwenenzi; Oct 24, 2016 at 10:21 pm Reason: added 2011 link
Oct 24, 2016, 10:15 pm
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New York City
Programs: HH Diamond, AA LifeTime Plat, DL Plat, Amex Centurion, Hertz Plaitnum
Posts: 306
Oct 25, 2016, 10:10 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,005
Do you have a solution? Tag numbers are electronic, and tied to you PNR, so there's no real need to keep paper tags. Paper is cheap and it mostly works - RFID on every single bag is likely cost prohibitive right now.
Oct 25, 2016, 12:40 pm
#9
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 916
it would be nice to have something that pinned INSIDE your bag , luggage tags fall off , handles break off etc
And something outside that says you have "BagFinder" attached....
not sure if it would transmit thru aluminum luggage or steel cases.....
And something outside that says you have "BagFinder" attached....
not sure if it would transmit thru aluminum luggage or steel cases.....
Oct 25, 2016, 1:15 pm
#10
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 1,100
In quantity, the RFID tags themselves are actually quite cheap; less than a dime each if memory serves. I'd imagine that replacing the existing infrastructure (and supporting software) for machines that produce / read barcodes, and getting all the airports to comply, without a compelling reason for the change, is the real barrier.
Oct 25, 2016, 1:58 pm
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
Honestly, this seems like an "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" situation. An airline-provided baggage routing tag on the handle with a built-in address tag for backup just works a vast majority of the time. Why complicate it?
Oct 25, 2016, 2:43 pm
#12
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,734
Especially when you consider that airlines are doing their damnedest to eliminate checked bags altogether.
Oct 27, 2016, 6:44 pm
#13
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Somewhere in Florida
Posts: 2,620
Yes...so cost-prohibitive that Delta is using RFID tags on EVERY checked bag at ALL of their domestic airports.
And they've even opened up the data so that pax can watch their bags get lost, mangled, and pilfered from.
Oct 27, 2016, 8:52 pm
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
Yes...so cost-prohibitive that Delta is using RFID tags on EVERY checked bag at ALL of their domestic airports. And they've even opened up the data so that pax can watch their bags get lost, mangled, and pilfered from.
And they've even opened up the data so that pax can watch their bags get lost, mangled, and pilfered from.