2015: Year of the 32GB, 4-Core Ultrabook?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,188
2015: Year of the 32GB, 4-Core Ultrabook?
I'm still schlepping a 16GB Lenovo T420 with an i5-2520M @ 2.5GHz. Performance is fine until I load it up with 3-4 virtual machines of various flavors. Execution threads are part of the problem, so is RAM.
I started a similar thread a year or two ago, wondering why there were no options supporting more than 16GB and was provided some great information by nkedel and others. But my quest hasn't ended.
Ultrabooks are now shipping with the Broadwell architecture, which supports 4 cores/8 threads (i7 HQ) and up to 32GB of RAM. Of the current crop, they all seem to be lacking in one or more areas, unfortunately.
This week's dream machine would have these specs:
I'm hoping the as-yet-unannounced Lenovo T450p will at least come close, but I haven't found anything else that does. Am I missing anything?
I started a similar thread a year or two ago, wondering why there were no options supporting more than 16GB and was provided some great information by nkedel and others. But my quest hasn't ended.
Ultrabooks are now shipping with the Broadwell architecture, which supports 4 cores/8 threads (i7 HQ) and up to 32GB of RAM. Of the current crop, they all seem to be lacking in one or more areas, unfortunately.
This week's dream machine would have these specs:
- i7-5700HQ or better
- Hardware support/socketing for 32GB RAM (yes, I know selection for 16GB SoDIMMs is limited, but I'M Intelligent Memory seems to have cracked that nut so others will follow)
- 14" FHD IPS display with discrete graphics (nVidia 950M or better)
- Support for internal/upgradeable 3rd party 2.5" SSD >= 500GB
- Support for 2nd internal SSD (M.2 is ok)
- Backlit keyboard
I'm hoping the as-yet-unannounced Lenovo T450p will at least come close, but I haven't found anything else that does. Am I missing anything?
#2
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,684
Just get a Macbook Pro. Better resale value and better engineered than anything else in the market.
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC E50K (*G) WS Gold | SPG/Fairmont Plat Hilton/Hyatt Diamond Marriott Silver | National Exec Elite
Posts: 19,284
I'm still schlepping a 16GB Lenovo T420 with an i5-2520M @ 2.5GHz. Performance is fine until I load it up with 3-4 virtual machines of various flavors. Execution threads are part of the problem, so is RAM.
I started a similar thread a year or two ago, wondering why there were no options supporting more than 16GB and was provided some great information by nkedel and others. But my quest hasn't ended.
Ultrabooks are now shipping with the Broadwell architecture, which supports 4 cores/8 threads (i7 HQ) and up to 32GB of RAM. Of the current crop, they all seem to be lacking in one or more areas, unfortunately.
This week's dream machine would have these specs:
I'm hoping the as-yet-unannounced Lenovo T450p will at least come close, but I haven't found anything else that does. Am I missing anything?
I started a similar thread a year or two ago, wondering why there were no options supporting more than 16GB and was provided some great information by nkedel and others. But my quest hasn't ended.
Ultrabooks are now shipping with the Broadwell architecture, which supports 4 cores/8 threads (i7 HQ) and up to 32GB of RAM. Of the current crop, they all seem to be lacking in one or more areas, unfortunately.
This week's dream machine would have these specs:
- i7-5700HQ or better
- Hardware support/socketing for 32GB RAM (yes, I know selection for 16GB SoDIMMs is limited, but I'M Intelligent Memory seems to have cracked that nut so others will follow)
- 14" FHD IPS display with discrete graphics (nVidia 950M or better)
- Support for internal/upgradeable 3rd party 2.5" SSD >= 500GB
- Support for 2nd internal SSD (M.2 is ok)
- Backlit keyboard
I'm hoping the as-yet-unannounced Lenovo T450p will at least come close, but I haven't found anything else that does. Am I missing anything?
All I need is 16gb of RAM for my VMs. I can't find any tablet like device with it.
#5
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Programs: Hilton Gold, Priority Club Blue, SPG Gold, Sofitel Gold, FB Ivory, BA Blue
Posts: 8,476
Personally, if I needed that level of performance, on the move, I'd be looking at a workstation class laptop (and accept the size/weight compromise).
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,684
You have to go pretty long with an MBP for it to have no resale value. It's the best designed laptop in the marketplace. That's coming from someone with an MBPr, $3000 Precision laptop and a new model XPS13. The people who actually innovate should be rewarded.
#7
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA LT PLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,564
That's great, but plenty of us have no interest in an iOS device. User friendly my .... lol
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,188
I've had a T60, a T61, two T400s, and now two T420s. While I was with IBM, I purchased similar models through IBMEPP for other family members. The T60 had a hard drive failure while using it on a train, most likely due to the crappy rails between BON and POR. That's the only issue I've ever experienced with IBM/Lenovo notebooks, and it wasn't even a Lenovo part.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
The primary purpose of an ultrabook is portability, not performance. However, the performance tradeoffs are perfectly acceptable/unnoticeable for most people. It sounds like an ultrabook may not be a good option for you considering your requirements--at least for the next few years--but if you're willing to go a bit heavier (~5.5lbs) the Lenovo W541 looks like it can be configured with 32GB of RAM, a 3K 15.6" LCD display as well as a 512GB SSD.
FWIW I have a late-2013 13" retina MBP with 16GB of RAM/2.6GHz i5/512GB SSD and it handles running a Windows 8.1 VM with no issues (albeit the fan does start kicking in). I haven't tried running multiple VMs at once so I don't know how that'd go. I am coming close to filling the SSD though so I will probably go larger the next time I upgrade. This is all with OS X, but I imagine it would be similar if I ran Windows as the host OS.
FWIW I have a late-2013 13" retina MBP with 16GB of RAM/2.6GHz i5/512GB SSD and it handles running a Windows 8.1 VM with no issues (albeit the fan does start kicking in). I haven't tried running multiple VMs at once so I don't know how that'd go. I am coming close to filling the SSD though so I will probably go larger the next time I upgrade. This is all with OS X, but I imagine it would be similar if I ran Windows as the host OS.
#10
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: YXE
Posts: 3,050
I'm still stuck on a Dell Latitude D830, though its been extensively upgraded with parts cannibalized from other laptops and extra antennae hacked in. I'd like a 15" replacement, but they don't seem to make them in Ultrabook flavour, and I'd like better than just FHD. Doesn't need to be full 4K, but better than FHD. Also I find keyboard on the E6540 or the T540 to be awful in that its not centered on the screen. A laptop does not need the number pad!!!! Put some speakers there, put some dead space, or whatever, but a big number pad that forces my wrists to bend in some assymetric fashion when using it is definitely not cool.
Dell had the Precision M3800 which looked promising at first with its display, but the real shocker is that it had no proprietary docking solution. Without being able to hook it up on the desktop easily to a pair of 4K displays, it not really suitable for my next laptop. It doesn't have a trackpoint/pointing stick either, which is another mandatory feature for me.
Likewise, the Apple products fail for the same reason. If they want to be serious business-class tools, they need to be able to be dropped onto a dock, and must have the trackpoint. The touchpad just doesn't cut it when on a plane or otherwise subject to any sort of vibration, and lacks the precision.
Dell had the Precision M3800 which looked promising at first with its display, but the real shocker is that it had no proprietary docking solution. Without being able to hook it up on the desktop easily to a pair of 4K displays, it not really suitable for my next laptop. It doesn't have a trackpoint/pointing stick either, which is another mandatory feature for me.
Likewise, the Apple products fail for the same reason. If they want to be serious business-class tools, they need to be able to be dropped onto a dock, and must have the trackpoint. The touchpad just doesn't cut it when on a plane or otherwise subject to any sort of vibration, and lacks the precision.
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,188
The primary purpose of an ultrabook is portability, not performance. However, the performance tradeoffs are perfectly acceptable/unnoticeable for most people. It sounds like an ultrabook may not be a good option for you considering your requirements--at least for the next few years--but if you're willing to go a bit heavier (~5.5lbs) the Lenovo W541 looks like it can be configured with 32GB of RAM, a 3K 15.6" LCD display as well as a 512GB SSD.
FWIW I have a late-2013 13" retina MBP with 16GB of RAM/2.6GHz i5/512GB SSD and it handles running a Windows 8.1 VM with no issues (albeit the fan does start kicking in). I haven't tried running multiple VMs at once so I don't know how that'd go. I am coming close to filling the SSD though so I will probably go larger the next time I upgrade. This is all with OS X, but I imagine it would be similar if I ran Windows as the host OS.
FWIW I have a late-2013 13" retina MBP with 16GB of RAM/2.6GHz i5/512GB SSD and it handles running a Windows 8.1 VM with no issues (albeit the fan does start kicking in). I haven't tried running multiple VMs at once so I don't know how that'd go. I am coming close to filling the SSD though so I will probably go larger the next time I upgrade. This is all with OS X, but I imagine it would be similar if I ran Windows as the host OS.
The W541 has been considered, but I'd really like to shave a pound or two from the weight.
MBPs are off the table; too fragile. Sorry, I know a lot of Mac folks take that personally.
I'm holding out for the Lenovo T450p, I guess. I'd prefer to go lighter, but it looks like the technology's still not there (or my needs are too far out of the mainstream for hardware vendors to be interested in meeting them). But if the T450p has two RAM sockets and an i7-5700HQ option, it would be damn close to what I'm looking for.
#12
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: YVR
Programs: Aeroplan, AAdvantage
Posts: 2,100
Well, Intel announced a Xeon mobile, that will certainly eat up 32GB. Whether ultrabook? Not sure. I am hoping Lenovo will put in the Retro ThinkPad they are planning. That would be sheer win.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,501
Speaking of the W541, Lenovo announced the P50/P70 today, which among other things can be configured with mobile Xeon processors and 64 GB of RAM. No difference in weight though but perhaps this increases the possibility of something lighter coming out in their lineup later?
http://www.engadget.com/2015/08/10/l...d-p50-and-p70/
http://www.engadget.com/2015/08/10/l...d-p50-and-p70/
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 26,287
BTW, the best-looking specs-for-the-money I've seen are on an ASUS Zenbook:
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Exclusively OMNI/PR, for Reasons
Posts: 4,188
They suck for running Windows, though. I should know, I tried for three years. Finally went back to a Sony Vaio, which is a great machine that sadly is now an orphan.
BTW, the best-looking specs-for-the-money I've seen are on an ASUS Zenbook: http://www.amazon.com/Zenbook-UX303L...enbook+ux303ln
BTW, the best-looking specs-for-the-money I've seen are on an ASUS Zenbook: http://www.amazon.com/Zenbook-UX303L...enbook+ux303ln