So who wants an Apple Watch?
#47
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: HNL
Programs: UA Premier 1K
Posts: 296
I think this is one of those cases where you'll have to wait for the 2nd or 3rd generation of the product before the biggest cons - thickness and battery life (or rather, lack of it) - have been improved upon.
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
I could see the usefulness if someone else was paying for the lower range models. I love having a real watch to check the time and not need to take my phone out during meetings, meals, etc. (or on the Jewish Sabbath and holidays when I can't use my phone).
But yet another article talking about the danger Apple faces in thinking they can just flip a switch and market luxury watches for $17K: Apple's $10,000 question: How to stop Apple Watch from becoming obsolete - CNET
But yet another article talking about the danger Apple faces in thinking they can just flip a switch and market luxury watches for $17K: Apple's $10,000 question: How to stop Apple Watch from becoming obsolete - CNET
#49
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 5
I watched the keynote, and as I expected when it was first announced, it is a neat idea but I cannot think of any way this helps me or makes my life easier. If anything, it adds the annoyance of being another device I have to charge every day and another charger I have to remember to bring with me on trips.
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: UA Silver, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 21,544
#53
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: YWG
Programs: Aeroplan, MileagePlus, Marriott Rewards
Posts: 2,159
Yeah... smartwatches just seem to duplicate what everyone's phone already does. It's basically an overpriced accessory that will be sitting in junk drawers four years from now. No thanks... I'll stick with my traditional watches.
#54
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 4,867
Not an iota - i prefer mechanical , analog watches. But I am betting this will be a huge smash hit.
Typically never "got" any new class of device that Apple launches (no, dont care if they were first or not), but history shows theyve been incredibly successful
Typically never "got" any new class of device that Apple launches (no, dont care if they were first or not), but history shows theyve been incredibly successful
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: TPA
Programs: Hilton Gold, DL DIrt Medallion
Posts: 38,267
I have always worn a watch anyway, so this is just a watch with extra functionality. I could see how it would be a hard sell for anyone who isn't already wearing watches or who is specifically into expensive mechanical watches.
I still wear my $12.00 8-year-old Timex in certain situations, but my Moto 360 is useful and I like it.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,217
Also, this was fun to read:
Pebble trolls Apple Watch event in real time on Twitter
#57
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: RDU
Programs: DL DM+(segs)/MM, UA Ag, Hilton DM, Marriott Ti (life Pt), TSA Opt-out Platinum
Posts: 3,226
#58
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 4,867
#59
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: HNL
Programs: UA Premier 1K
Posts: 296
But yet another article talking about the danger Apple faces in thinking they can just flip a switch and market luxury watches for $17K: Apple's $10,000 question: How to stop Apple Watch from becoming obsolete - CNET
#60
Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,684
I have always worn a watch anyway, so this is just a watch with extra functionality. I could see how it would be a hard sell for anyone who isn't already wearing watches or who is specifically into expensive mechanical watches.
It doesn't take much more effort to reach into your pocket, hold your phone and raise your arm up than it does to just raise your arm up.