Obama appoints Errol Southers to head the TSA
#63
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: FrostByte Falls, Mn
Programs: Holiday Inn Plat NW gold AA gold
Posts: 2,157
You know, while I was in the military, all I ever heard was how inefficient it was and how it would never make it in the civilian world. When I retired, I looked at the civilian world with an open mind and found that the opposite is true. Granted, these weren't in-depth studies, but I think I got a good insight into how a couple large corporations did things.
Your anti-military rhetoric aside, there's a lot to learn from the military. It's very mission-oriented and its people are driven towards success. Failure simply isn't an option.
I think TSA behaves very much like a civilian enterprise. That's its problem.
Your anti-military rhetoric aside, there's a lot to learn from the military. It's very mission-oriented and its people are driven towards success. Failure simply isn't an option.
I think TSA behaves very much like a civilian enterprise. That's its problem.
Once worked for a retired colonel who staffed his department management with friends. One of his friends horribly abused those around him. When HR got involved I was called in and asked if a series of allegations by a quitting fellow employee were true. Answered yes. The col asked why I hadn't come to him and responded with "that would have been jumping the chain of command. You would not have approved. You're still the colonel." A month later both the colonel and his abusing friend got laid off.
#64
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
You know, while I was in the military, all I ever heard was how inefficient it was and how it would never make it in the civilian world. When I retired, I looked at the civilian world with an open mind and found that the opposite is true. Granted, these weren't in-depth studies, but I think I got a good insight into how a couple large corporations did things.
Your anti-military rhetoric aside, there's a lot to learn from the military. It's very mission-oriented and its people are driven towards success. Failure simply isn't an option.
Your anti-military rhetoric aside, there's a lot to learn from the military. It's very mission-oriented and its people are driven towards success. Failure simply isn't an option.
What's the difference between anti-military rhetoric and pro-military rhetoric ?
Who posts it.
I rest my case. It doesn't behave enough like a civilian enterprise.
#65
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
You know, while I was in the military, all I ever heard was how inefficient it was and how it would never make it in the civilian world. When I retired, I looked at the civilian world with an open mind and found that the opposite is true. Granted, these weren't in-depth studies, but I think I got a good insight into how a couple large corporations did things.
Your anti-military rhetoric aside, there's a lot to learn from the military. It's very mission-oriented and its people are driven towards success. Failure simply isn't an option.
I think TSA behaves very much like a civilian enterprise. That's its problem.
Your anti-military rhetoric aside, there's a lot to learn from the military. It's very mission-oriented and its people are driven towards success. Failure simply isn't an option.
I think TSA behaves very much like a civilian enterprise. That's its problem.
#66
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 27,997
Halls120 has mentioned a report that made recommendations about security initiatives that was dismissed by KHIAI.
I would hope that a copy of this report could be provided to Southers on the QT along with background.
The time to get opposing information to the new guy will be limited. The current staff will surely do everything to push their POV.
I would hope that a copy of this report could be provided to Southers on the QT along with background.
The time to get opposing information to the new guy will be limited. The current staff will surely do everything to push their POV.
#68
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 27,997
Y'know, law dawg, it is frustrating at times how often non-decisions are made around here. Perhaps you're right: it is the worst of both worlds. And I have to admit that perhaps my interpretation of what constitutes a good military leaders is skewed because I was assigned to specialized operational units. We conducted live, no-sh*t, real-world missions, so the BS factor was extremely low when it came to getting things done. Everyone I was affiliated with was a self-starter because we couldn't function with a permission-seeker in our midst.
At any rate, a good leader lets subordinate leaders do their jobs. And that was what prompted this sidebar discussion. I'm certain the same applies in law enforcement circles as well. The on-scene commander, or whatever it is you call the senior officer, has to be able to make the call without the chief of police second-guessing him from behind the desk. This includes situations when an officer screws up. I may not be saying it correctly, but you get the gist of what I mean.
At any rate, a good leader lets subordinate leaders do their jobs. And that was what prompted this sidebar discussion. I'm certain the same applies in law enforcement circles as well. The on-scene commander, or whatever it is you call the senior officer, has to be able to make the call without the chief of police second-guessing him from behind the desk. This includes situations when an officer screws up. I may not be saying it correctly, but you get the gist of what I mean.
Encountering a military like atmosphere is foreign to many and not well recieved. People don't want to be treated as a criminal or some kind to lessor person just because they want to get on an airplane. They are not conditioned to respond well to barking orders of some unknow person. That is why the staffing TSA with former LEO and military types and such works against public acceptance. The new hires right out of high school or college have no reference to what should happen in a work place so they take their clues from the older workers. This contributes to the problems of citizens asking questions about what they are being subjected to certain procedures and screeners feeling they are being challenged about their A-Thor-A-TY.
TSA needs a complete overhaul.
People are subjected to uncalled for abusive secondary screenings just for asking questions.
They have permitted property confiscated by poorly trained TSO's.
Constitutional violations occur to often at TSA checkpoints and no effective corrective action is taken to correct this abuses.
Can the new head of TSA make the needed changes?
I don't think so but wish him good luck and I am willing to allow some time to see how he sizes up his new post.
Last edited by Boggie Dog; Aug 9, 2009 at 1:50 pm Reason: do to don't
#69
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,148
The public sees, for better or for worse, the pointy end of the spear at an airport or, increasingly, at mass transit and bus terminals. Southers really needs to fix a lot of things upstream of an airport: policy and procedures tailored to the threat, clearly delegated responsibility, authority, and expectations of accountability, a sense of vision and context, etc, etc. Individuals who violate the public trust at all levels of his organization need to be dealt with swiftly, fairly, and in a manner which quickly restores the public trust. He needs to be a team player -- with the rest of the national security community, the intelligence community, and private sector stakeholders.
Guys with our background were taught this kind of leadership when we were lieutenants. When we were all young captains at Squadron Officer School, we watched (several times) and studied the three distinct leadership phases of Brig Gen Savage in Twelve O'Clock High when he took over the fictional worst bomber group in WWII. Southers would do well to rent the film and study it.
If Southers does all of this, he will go a long way to earning the public's trust in his leadership and judgment -- something completely lacking from Day One. Kippie bags, gate screening, shoes in or not in bins, screener theft, etc, would take care of themselves.
Then, he can start his second week on the job!
Last edited by FliesWay2Much; Aug 9, 2009 at 1:28 pm
#71
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
Y'know, law dawg, it is frustrating at times how often non-decisions are made around here. Perhaps you're right: it is the worst of both worlds. And I have to admit that perhaps my interpretation of what constitutes a good military leaders is skewed because I was assigned to specialized operational units. We conducted live, no-sh*t, real-world missions, so the BS factor was extremely low when it came to getting things done. Everyone I was affiliated with was a self-starter because we couldn't function with a permission-seeker in our midst.
At any rate, a good leader lets subordinate leaders do their jobs. And that was what prompted this sidebar discussion. I'm certain the same applies in law enforcement circles as well. The on-scene commander, or whatever it is you call the senior officer, has to be able to make the call without the chief of police second-guessing him from behind the desk. This includes situations when an officer screws up. I may not be saying it correctly, but you get the gist of what I mean.
At any rate, a good leader lets subordinate leaders do their jobs. And that was what prompted this sidebar discussion. I'm certain the same applies in law enforcement circles as well. The on-scene commander, or whatever it is you call the senior officer, has to be able to make the call without the chief of police second-guessing him from behind the desk. This includes situations when an officer screws up. I may not be saying it correctly, but you get the gist of what I mean.
#72
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
Unfortunately that desire of his is incorporated into law, and so those days are not gone for ever. The groundwork has been legally set -- and not yet been undone -- that allows for just what he too in that Administration wanted. We can "thank" Congress for that too.
#73
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
When juxtaposing the above quote with the actual history of how he operated at various points in his lifetime, the above is a case of "practice what I preach but don't usually practice myself" even when succeeding.
#74
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco, USA
Posts: 79
#75
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MIA
Programs: PC Plat/Amb
Posts: 1,152
Encountering a military like atmosphere is foreign to many and not well recieved. People don't want to be treated as a criminal or some kind to lessor person just because they want to get on an airplane. They are not conditioned to respond well to barking orders of some unknow person. That is why the staffing TSA with former LEO and military types and such works against public acceptance. The new hires right out of high school or college have no reference to what should happen in a work place so they take their clues from the older workers. This contributes to the problems of citizens asking questions about what they are being subjected to certain procedures and screeners feeling they are being challenged about their A-Thor-A-TY.