Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Atlanta refuses Opting Out?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:33 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10
Atlanta refuses Opting Out?

Flyer in Atlanta claims TSO told her she had to leave if she didn't go through the NoS.

Haven't found this reported anywhere else.

http://wewontfly.com/kris-in-atlanta...ve-the-airport
mdhpiper is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:39 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 569
If this is true - then the game has changed dramatically.
Darkumbra is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:40 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,967
I cannot stand still
I cannot stand without aid
I cannot raise my arms in the required position
I cannot hear your instructions
I cannot follow directions

etc etc

'I cannot fly'?
exbayern is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:41 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RDU
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 772
If all the airports take this tact, it could spell disaster for the TSA.
mikemey is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:41 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 33
Well we'll certainly find out tomorrow, won't we...
PaladinErrant is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:41 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Denton County, TX
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 737
I suppose it is possible that a clerk was THAT misinformed or THAT much of a bully. Amidst all this uproar, there is no way the opt-out policy has changed in that regard.

Other option is that the woman was mistaken. Or possibly lying.
TXagogo is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:46 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by TXagogo
Other option is that the woman was mistaken. Or possibly lying.
Which is why I tried finding this reported elsewhere, and decided not to share it on my Facebook yet (which is where I discovered this, via We Won't Fly and National Opt Out Day's FB pages.)
mdhpiper is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:54 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 7,511
If it's true (and no pat-down option permitted), and the pax had the time, I'd have requested an LEO for the escort out. At that point, doesn't the LEO have to take a report, and the subject of the report would have been "pax refused mandatory AIT"?

Yet big "if it's true" caveat.
sbagdon is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:57 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 117
If this is true then TSA has determined that irradiating the citizens of the United States is their only option.

I will not fly commercially again.

And this woman shouldn't have either.
standupforrights is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 2:59 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
Originally Posted by mikemey
If all the airports take this tact, it could spell disaster for the TSA.
And a major disaster for the airlines!
FriendlySkies is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 3:01 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North of DFW
Programs: AA PLT, HH Gold, TSA Disparager Gold, going for Platnium
Posts: 1,535
If this is true TSA just signed its own Death Warrant as well as the Airlines.
Scubatooth is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 3:05 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The best state in the USA - Florida!
Programs: Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, AS MVP75K, AA PlatPro, UA Premier, Disney AP
Posts: 14,497
Originally Posted by exbayern
I cannot stand still
I cannot stand without aid
I cannot raise my arms in the required position
I cannot hear your instructions
I cannot follow directions

etc etc

'I cannot fly'?
Amen. I have a shoulder injury where my shoulder does pop in and out of my shoulder if I raise it above my head. Guess what - I trust my doctors more than I trust TSA and their medical geniuses working the checkpoints.
mersk862 is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 3:09 pm
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,198
I think this was a rogue supervisor - the subject of the article should have escalated.

I won't let my blood boil over the next TSA move. I'm smarter than they are. If they make NOS mandatory, I will buy a fabric arm sling and get a doctor's note from my other half - no NOS, no shoes. Let them do the extra work and I'll just budget an extra 10-15 minutes of airport time for the privilege of giving them the finger.

Sling will go on when I enter the airport, and will come off after clearing the checkpoint.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 3:47 pm
  #14  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by exbayern
I cannot stand still
I cannot stand without aid
I cannot raise my arms in the required position
I cannot hear your instructions
I cannot follow directions

etc etc

'I cannot fly'?
yup
goalie is offline  
Old Nov 23, 2010, 3:58 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: LGA/JFK
Programs: Marriott Rewards
Posts: 47
I'm not willing to assume she was lying as a first line of refutation.

I am wondering, if she's that regular a flyer, why she would not, in preparation, have brought a copy of the TSA policy with her that says opting out is permissible, to show that supervisor.

I'm also wondering why she did not ask to see that supervisor's supervisor, instead of submitting herself to an as yet unestablished level of radiation risk, in order to travel through her country as befitting her Constitutional right as a U.S. citizen.
Rooo is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.