Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Nov 5, 09, 4:43 am   #1
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,702
Improperly screened TSA emp. prompts hijacking concern.

http://www.nwfdailynews.com/news/hij...ads-scare.html
Quote:
A Delta Air Lines jet bound for Atlanta was ordered to return to the airport shortly after takeoff, Sari Koshetz, spokeswoman for the Transportation Security Administration, said in a statement.

Koshetz said the call back was ordered “because of improper screening.”

Greg Donovan, the director of airports for Okaloosa County, gave a more detailed explanation.

Apparently there were some discrepancies in the screening process for a TSA employee that was onboard,” Donovan said.

TSA officials made the call to bring the airplane back, Koshetz said. They apparently did so without notifying anyone at Eglin Air Force Base.

Northwest Florida Regional Airport is located on Eglin.
The rest of the story.

Also read the call history report. (PDF warning)
__________________
TSOs come play at the Screeners Forum.
Read gsoltso's guest post Trollkiller's T-Shirts
Trollkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 5:18 am   #2
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (usually), GVA (occasionally)
Programs: QF PS, SQ-Silver
Posts: 907
But TSA dude had a background check, right? So what's the big panic?

(Dollars to donuts Blogdad Bob engineered this to take the focus off the Britney Ice-capade.)
__________________
When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty. - George Bernard Shaw
RadioGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 6:04 am   #3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 10,173
TSA is reviewing the incident and will take appropriate action if necessary, Koshetz stated in the release.
You screwed up the screening, you sent out a misleading message to the authorities indicating a hijacking, you failed to appropriately notify the airbase of what was happening, you required a commercial airline (and the local authorities) to waste a ton of money and resources, you caused a useless delay to a plane full of passengers, your entire department is a POS and "if necessary" they will take action There really is no hope
GoingAway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 6:14 am   #4
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,487
If the TSA employee skirted screening that person should be responsible for all cost in the police alerts and airline operating cost. The other passengers should have something coming also.

If TSA is reponsible then they are responsible for the cost of the event. Of course that would be mine and your monies.
Boggie Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 6:23 am   #5
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 910
Finally, the truth is beginning to come out- the biggest risk to security is TSA.
__________________
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." Mark Twain
IslandBased is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 6:25 am   #6
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (usually), GVA (occasionally)
Programs: QF PS, SQ-Silver
Posts: 907
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boggie Dog View Post
If TSA is reponsible then they are responsible for the cost of the event. Of course that would be mine and your monies.
Typically TSA is irresponsible - corporately and individually. But there's a first time for everything.

Actually, if anyone takes responsibility, and makes reparation, that would be a first.
__________________
When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty. - George Bernard Shaw
RadioGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 6:55 am   #7
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,086
I wish I could say "unbelievable", but unfortunately that is not the case.
doober is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 8:03 am   #8
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioGirl View Post
Typically TSA is irresponsible - corporately and individually. But there's a first time for everything.

Actually, if anyone takes responsibility, and makes reparation, that would be a first.

I agree with you but to compensate the airline, passengers, ground crew and such should be required.

If the individual skirted security I really hope that just rescreening won't be the only action taken. If so that really points to TSA being unaccountable.(What's new there?)

However, even if it was just TSA screw up a heck of a lot of people were delayed, may have missed other flights and so forth.

Someone in TSA has to held accountable, but I doubt that will happen. (What's new there?)
Boggie Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 9:00 am   #9
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,654
If you look at the TSA response, a single and brief sentence, it's fairly obvious they have something to hide here.

Feels like a screener skirted screening. Time to warm up the "remedial training" room.

As for accountability? Ha....don't make me laugh.
__________________
Excuse me stewardess, I speak jive.
LessO2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 9:19 am   #10
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DTW
Programs: NW-Plat, SPG-Gold, IC Hotels-Gold, National Emerald Exec.
Posts: 2,120
Quote:
When the plane landed, Koshetz said, “the passenger in question was removed from the flight, re-screened and was allowed to rebook a flight.”
I would like to thank the TSA for their rational response in this matter. They were smart enough to know that this possible rougue terrorist TSA employee did not pass off his bomb/knife/gun/aquafina to an accomplice beyond the checkpoint. They did not have to recall all planes that had boarded after the breach and dump the terminal. Great job TSA!!!

I'm not sure if I'm being sarcastic or actually believe this is an improvement.
__________________
Tom
tev9999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 9:35 am   #11
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Sunshine State
Programs: Deltaworst Peon Level, TSA "Layer 19 Club", NW WP RIP
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoingAway View Post
TSA is reviewing the incident and There really is no hope
Yes there is. It will take Blogdad Bob and the PV crew at least until tomorrow to fabricate a spin angle. We can hope to see another Instant Classic Friday Afternoon Puppy Post to cover up this one.

Except for that much wasted jet fuel, he might need to throw in a kitten or two.
__________________
J. Edgar Hoover. Pg. 203 A Study of Communism: "Travel: Internal passports are required for identification and travel."
Flaflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 10:42 am   #12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO, CDG, PBI
Programs: UA-1k, HH Silver, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & now a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 10,179
this really pi$$es me off-the tsa screws up yet again and no one takes them to task...

in this case, there is an airforce base "nearby" and guess what folks, there are fighter planes at airforce bases. can you imagine what could have happened "out of an abundance of caution" by the airforce.

i'm telling you, we need to start a "tsa screw up du jour" thread
__________________
just my humble opinion but i used to try and stop hockey pucks so what do i know . Nighthawks fans are everywhere
goalie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 11:56 am   #13
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by goalie View Post
this really pi$$es me off-the tsa screws up yet again and no one takes them to task...

in this case, there is an airforce base "nearby" and guess what folks, there are fighter planes at airforce bases. can you imagine what could have happened "out of an abundance of caution" by the airforce.

i'm telling you, we need to start a "tsa screw up du jour" thread
Already done. PV
Boggie Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 09, 2:35 pm   #14
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 22
Aircraft "ordered" to land by TSA?

I didn't know TSA had legal authority to "order" an aircraft to land.

I'm hoping the press report got this wrong, and that an STSO or FSD can't just call the tower and issue legally binding air traffic control orders.
Self_Loading_Ballast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 09, 12:08 am   #15
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: various cities in the USofA: NYC, BWI, IAH, CHI, ?
Programs: CO Gold, Hilton Gold somehow, AGR moocher via CO
Posts: 3,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Self_Loading_Ballast View Post
I didn't know TSA had legal authority to "order" an aircraft to land.
I was wondering about this too. What if the pilot said "Ummm... you're telling me I have to turn back because a TSA employee might be a terrorist? Very funny... stop illegally broadcasting on aviation bands. Bye." and kept on going?

IMO unless the employee is held personally liable, he was acting the course of his employment. If the employee is not made to pay the costs for this, it's an admission by the TSA that they are at fault.

Of course this tells us how much trust the TSA has in their employees: none.
__________________
My Flights @ OpenFights (contains forward-looking statements and lacks historical accuracy).
ralfp is online now   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:11 pm.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0