Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Products

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Apr 29, 09, 8:15 pm   #16
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
I used to own an Ebags Weekender...decent bag...I sold it for a few reasons.

Dimensions are 22 x 14 x 9...okay for U.S....but too big for restrictive overseas flights.

Weight....empty if weighs just under 4 pounds. Tri-star weighs under 3. Again with carry-on weigh restrictions, every pound counts.

I found the front organizer pocket a waste. The pockets were okay for small things although I never used them and the front pocket itself was fairly shallow.

For the price, it's okay, if your travels don't take you on airlines that restrict.

Oh, and it holds a ton which may make it easy for people to overpack.
fbrown627 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29, 09, 8:17 pm   #17
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
I'm probably going to get a Tri-Star.....to save some money, though, instead of buying the accompanying packing cubes, I realize both my Eagle Creek 18 Folder and EC Double Cube will fit in the bag. One in the front pocket, one in the back.

This leaves the middle section for electronics and knick knacks.
fbrown627 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29, 09, 8:25 pm   #18
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: South of 90° N
Programs: B6 Platinum, WN Quartz
Posts: 271
All links keep returning:


Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, darcy@tombihn.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
__________________
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Clinton, during his grand jury testimony, aka Slick Willy.
owflyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 09, 12:02 am   #19
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 110
They had so much traffic, their server went down for a few hours.
fbrown627 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 09, 2:49 pm   #20
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaigonCyclo View Post
[b]
Welcome to FlyerTalk!
Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaigonCyclo View Post
[b]
And how is the 1050 ballistic waterproof? Your website says it's treated for water resistance. With such a large weave, you'd need 120g PU or a TPU/SPU backing. I didn't see that mentioned.
Our 1050 denier ballistic nylon is treated with a 1-1/2 oz. per square yard urethane coating that helps prevent water from penetrating the fabric. Most 1050 ballistic nylon is made with three-quarter to one ounce polyurethane coating because less coating = less expensive. It is fairly rare for ballistic to be made with a coating as heavy as ours. The face of the fabric is treated with a durable water-repellent. There are membranes/laminates/coatings that can be less than 120g and still be waterproof, BTW. Our fabric suppliers' labs are always conducting fabric tests for us and we hope to post some water-resistance tests on our site soon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaigonCyclo View Post
[b]
Nothing wrong with the zippers. I personally like them. But unless the bag is waterproof, it's an expensive cosmetic upgrade.
In our own tests and tests performed by reviewers of our products (one reviewer took a five minute shower with his Aeronaut, which has the YKK Uretek splash-proof zippers, and no water entered the bag) the YKK Uretek zipper has far better water-repellency than a non-Uretek zipper. The feedback from our customers backs that up. I understand it's your opinion that the zipper is purely cosmetic (and it is one good-looking zipper!) but our five years of use of the zipper confirms its value adding water repellency to our products.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaigonCyclo View Post
[b]Victorinox used 1050 ballistic nylon on their NXT series.
Hmm . . . I can't find any reference that backs that up. Probably neither here nor there. I'm an expert on only one bag company.
darcytb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 09, 2:51 pm   #21
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbrown627 View Post
They had so much traffic, their server went down for a few hours.
Our site is up-and-running, but it is hiccup-ing here and there. If anyone gets error messages, keep trying! Sorry for the inconvenience.

[quote=ScottC]Welcome to Flyertalk, Darcy! Great to have you here![/url]

Thanks, ScottC. Please let me know if I post anything I shouldn't!
darcytb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 09, 6:08 pm   #22
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcytb View Post
Thanks.




Hmm . . . I can't find any reference that backs that up. Probably neither here nor there. I'm an expert on only one bag company.
They also used it on their Triax collection
SaigonCyclo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 09, 7:21 pm   #23
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Programs: AA, CO
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaigonCyclo View Post

Victorinox used 1050 ballistic nylon on their NXT series.
Which NXT series? The 4.0 series I could find says they use 2100D

link
quan98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 09, 10:21 pm   #24
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rio Grande Do Sul, Brasil and Rayong, Thailand
Programs: American Platinum Lifetime, Starwood Gold, United, Krisflyer, Delta, Lufthansa, Thai, Int. Avenger
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcytb View Post
Hello! Darcy from TOM BIHN here.

Victorinox, to our knowledge, has never used 1050 denier ballistic nylon.

We've been using YKK's Uretek splash-proof zippers for over five years. Our customers (and external reviewers) have tested the water-resistance of these zippers whether on purpose (one reviewer took a shower with his Aeronaut to test the zippers) or not (customers caught in a rain storm), and the feedback has been resoundingly positive.

An unshielded standard zipper is much less water-resistant than our YKK Uretek zippers. In addition, our 1050 denier ballistic nylon fabric is waterproof - what makes our bags not completely waterproof is that the bags are sewn as opposed to RF-welded. Only bags that are RF-welded - like Ortlieb bags - can be called waterproof.

If any FlyerTalk forum members have questions about the Tri-Star, ask away.
Great to see a company rep. come on a forum and discuss their products. Welcome Darcy.....when I have a chance, I will look over your line of merchandise.

It would be nice to see someone from Travel Pro come on here and defend their warranty (or non-warranty fraud) program.
maskedavenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 09, 8:58 am   #25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
I Voted
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West of DFW on the prairie
Programs: AA lifetime GOLD, thanks FT, AARP senior member
Posts: 13,843
Welcome Darcy! It is great to see a fine company represented here. You have found the mother lode of folks who own entirely too much luggage as we seek perfection.
oldpenny16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 09, 9:31 am   #26
I Voted
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Club Grazie Gold Lounge
Programs: CO-Plat*; UA-1K; GalacticXpress-Irridium; HH-Diamond; Hyatt-Diamond; Priority Club-Plat; SPG-Gold
Posts: 8,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldpenny16 View Post
You have found the mother lode of folks who own entirely too much luggage as we seek perfection.
You got that right . We should start a thread of who owns what.
__________________
Flight Memory
kingalien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 09, 12:58 pm   #27
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 9
Thanks for all of the warm welcomes! I am having a lot of fun reading the posts here.

This discussion has spurred further research (on my part - Tom and June, our factory manager, are already experts) into the world of fabrics and materials that we use. The U.S. company that makes our custom 1050 denier ballistic nylon has been amazingly helpful. It's so cool that we get to talk directly with the fabric lab. We've been inspired to create a fabric/material glossary on our site - look for that sometime in June.
darcytb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 09, 1:09 pm   #28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
I Voted
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West of DFW on the prairie
Programs: AA lifetime GOLD, thanks FT, AARP senior member
Posts: 13,843
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingalien View Post
You got that right . We should start a thread of who owns what.
Some of us would be ashamed to reveal all.
oldpenny16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 09, 4:52 pm   #29
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 549
Quote:
Originally Posted by quan98 View Post
Which NXT series? The 4.0 series I could find says they use 2100D
1050d Ballistic x 2 is 2100d

1680d Ballistic is actually 2 x 840d or even 4 x 420d
SaigonCyclo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 09, 5:59 pm   #30
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by fbrown627 View Post
I used to own an Ebags Weekender...decent bag...I sold it for a few reasons.

Dimensions are 22 x 14 x 9...okay for U.S....but too big for restrictive overseas flights.

Weight....empty if weighs just under 4 pounds. Tri-star weighs under 3. Again with carry-on weigh restrictions, every pound counts.

I found the front organizer pocket a waste. The pockets were okay for small things although I never used them and the front pocket itself was fairly shallow.

For the price, it's okay, if your travels don't take you on airlines that restrict.

Oh, and it holds a ton which may make it easy for people to overpack.
Ebags sells a couple of other bags made by Jansport that seem similar to the Weekender. One is the Weekaway, which is 20" x 12" x 8.5" and 3 lbs 3 oz, same price as the Ebags Weekender. The other is the Euro Pak, which is 13" x 21" x 10" and weighs 3 lbs, for about $80.

I'm sure neither of these Jansport bags are the quality of the Tom Bihn.

On the other hand, I found a Weekaway in an awful fabric (brown with pink dots) for $15 at my local Ross store. It is good to see that this category is attracting interest from the manufacturers. I have a similar 20 year old bag from Members Only (!) that will someday need to be replaced. -- Suzanne
SuzanneSLO is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 pm.




SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0