Tumi warranty not lifetime!
#61
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 163
Price point $519 for a bag that statistically is more than 500 times as likely to need a repair than the bag that is $589, oh yeah they are just so high in price compared to the much more reasonably priced B&R bag. Too funny, that's comparing signature models of the 22" Roll-a-board bags for each brand.
#62
Join Date: May 2011
Programs: AA LT Platinum, WN CP, National EE, Hertz PC, Avis PC, Hilton Diamond, Sheraton Gold
Posts: 278
#63
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 31
Tumi sells tons of bags to people who want something fancy, but don't travel much (my mom for instance). BR sells mostly to people who travel regularly - if you're not serious about travel, why buy an expensive ugly bag that no one has heard of? It's not surprising if BR bags fail more frequently. They probably get used much more often.
Everyone should buy what they want, and everyone should be respectful of the choices of others. The "industry guy" should probably get a talking to from the mods. He/she should definitely not bother replying to me because I won't read it.
#64
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In order of nights spent: MSP, ORD, OGG, FCO, LHR
Programs: DL 1MM Dia, AA Plat, UA 1MM Gold, HHonors LT Dia, Marriott/SPG LT Plat Prem
Posts: 473
I've said it a bunch of times, come to the Travel Goods Show, they have a seminar/forum on this topic every year, and the B&R folks are in the room. They have never disputed the numbers presented.
#65
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
I've got both as well as B&R and Tumi. Functionally, B&R is the most well-organized and designed for my use. Aesthetically, Tumi is appealing but I dislike the snob appeal aspect so my wife is the one who uses it, even though she's largely indifferent when it comes to luggage brands, except for LV or other haute coutre.
#66
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In order of nights spent: MSP, ORD, OGG, FCO, LHR
Programs: DL 1MM Dia, AA Plat, UA 1MM Gold, HHonors LT Dia, Marriott/SPG LT Plat Prem
Posts: 473
What are some of these options? I thought Victorinox Tourbach and Red Oxx might be among them but wanted to get your take as an industry insider.
I've got both as well as B&R and Tumi. Functionally, B&R is the most well-organized and designed for my use. Aesthetically, Tumi is appealing but I dislike the snob appeal aspect so my wife is the one who uses it, even though she's largely indifferent when it comes to luggage brands, except for LV or other haute coutre.
I've got both as well as B&R and Tumi. Functionally, B&R is the most well-organized and designed for my use. Aesthetically, Tumi is appealing but I dislike the snob appeal aspect so my wife is the one who uses it, even though she's largely indifferent when it comes to luggage brands, except for LV or other haute coutre.
I think Red Oxx will be near the top for durability, but you will give up aesthetic appeal and some other features. It's a lot easier to have a bag that doesn't fail when it doesn't have a retractable handle or wheels. The tough part for Red Oxx is that they don't sell enough luggage pieces to be listed or ranked or discussed in the seminar/forum, or they are excluded because they don't participate with the TGA. All of this on Red Oxx is from my personal opinion, based on what I have seen or heard, and this is only my opinion.
Ace Brands (Zero Halliburton and Proteca) have both been ranked at the top every year, Rimowa, Bric's, and Pelican all beat out anything coming from anyone else, and round out the top 5 brands presented at the TGA show. I hope this helps.
Last edited by mspreh; Jul 16, 2016 at 6:03 am Reason: Typo
#67
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
mspreh--appreciate the feedback on the top 5. I've never heard of Proteca or Brics but have positive impressions of Zero Halliburton and Pelican while somewhat negative on Rimowa, albeit without any personal experience. Will have to check these out the next time I need luggage.
I can also vouch for Red Oxx. I went all out when deciding to one bag it and bought multiples of different Red Oxx models. Simpler design with fewer points of potential failure. Of course, the ones bought for the wife were used a few times then stuck in the closet or garage since she didn't like carrying all the crap she insists on bringing, while the ones I've used are cosmetically worn but far from failure. The aesthetic is something I grew to appreciate but certainly not for everyone. Living in the west, it fits in better than in more fashion-conscious locales.
Thanks again.
I can also vouch for Red Oxx. I went all out when deciding to one bag it and bought multiples of different Red Oxx models. Simpler design with fewer points of potential failure. Of course, the ones bought for the wife were used a few times then stuck in the closet or garage since she didn't like carrying all the crap she insists on bringing, while the ones I've used are cosmetically worn but far from failure. The aesthetic is something I grew to appreciate but certainly not for everyone. Living in the west, it fits in better than in more fashion-conscious locales.
Thanks again.
#68
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 2
For me it's not "how", it's "why"? Why the hostile tone? Why the constant need to reply? Why the appeal to "I work in the industry"?
Tumi sells tons of bags to people who want something fancy, but don't travel much (my mom for instance). BR sells mostly to people who travel regularly - if you're not serious about travel, why buy an expensive ugly bag that no one has heard of? It's not surprising if BR bags fail more frequently. They probably get used much more often.
Everyone should buy what they want, and everyone should be respectful of the choices of others. The "industry guy" should probably get a talking to from the mods. He/she should definitely not bother replying to me because I won't read it.
Tumi sells tons of bags to people who want something fancy, but don't travel much (my mom for instance). BR sells mostly to people who travel regularly - if you're not serious about travel, why buy an expensive ugly bag that no one has heard of? It's not surprising if BR bags fail more frequently. They probably get used much more often.
Everyone should buy what they want, and everyone should be respectful of the choices of others. The "industry guy" should probably get a talking to from the mods. He/she should definitely not bother replying to me because I won't read it.
#69
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PWM
Programs: AA Plat
Posts: 1,335
I just finished dealing with Tumi. Never again!
My 4.5 year old laptop bag developed a small 1 inch tear in the back padding so I paid $15 and sent it in. They claimed it was "unrepairable" and not "due to normal wear and tear." Offered me a measly $75 trade in credit (as if you can buy anything with that).
I asked for my bag back and wrote a nice letter asking for the credit+shipping ($100). They ignored it for a couple of months. Finally countered with a $100 Tumi gift card! I wrote another letter (less nice) and requested $300 cash. They countered with the original value of the bag ($165). I stuck to my guns and settled for $300. Yes I realize that's twice what I originally paid.
Rude employee (here in San Diego, everyone was nice in Georgia), flimsy warranty, and truly dysfunctional customer service (they didn't even give the rep my correspondence).
My 4.5 year old laptop bag developed a small 1 inch tear in the back padding so I paid $15 and sent it in. They claimed it was "unrepairable" and not "due to normal wear and tear." Offered me a measly $75 trade in credit (as if you can buy anything with that).
I asked for my bag back and wrote a nice letter asking for the credit+shipping ($100). They ignored it for a couple of months. Finally countered with a $100 Tumi gift card! I wrote another letter (less nice) and requested $300 cash. They countered with the original value of the bag ($165). I stuck to my guns and settled for $300. Yes I realize that's twice what I originally paid.
Rude employee (here in San Diego, everyone was nice in Georgia), flimsy warranty, and truly dysfunctional customer service (they didn't even give the rep my correspondence).
#70
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN/YYZ/YKF
Programs: COdbaUA 1K MM, AA EXP, Bonbon Gold, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, NEXUS and GE
Posts: 5,839
#71
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: DTW
Programs: skymiles, 1 MM-DM
Posts: 14
Excuse me if I get a bit of Tumi topic with this reply;
In regards to the 5 years Manufacturing warranty, I can agree on that but what about a Design issue ? Not all Luggage issues stem from having the Manufacturer assemble the bag incorrectly.
If I have to pay for a repair maybe I can do that vs tossing the bag but nothing more frustrating to hear that this bag is discontinued and parts are not available. The 10-30% offered discount does not help since I am not planning on paying full retail anyway.
I am using a large Tumi and a Roll-on size Kirkland bag for my travels. Both get checked in because I don't like to carry-on a lot of bags. The Kirkland bag is at least 17 years old. I have used it a lot and it is holding up great. It has about 27 screws with locking nuts. I just tightened them all but non where missing vs the Tumi that has either self tapping screws or just machine screws that end up missing. I belief the Kirkland bag is US made since the fasteners seems to be standard size.
The Tumi retractable Handle base developed a large crack but is still usable and I plan on getting it fixed asap just need the time to get it to the shop. I believe the Handle is not covered under items that can be claimed against damaged caused by the airline.
I have a great repair shop close by that is very familiar with Tumi (and perhaps others) I believe this also makes a big difference vs working with a retail store and having to send out everything for repairs.
In regards to the 5 years Manufacturing warranty, I can agree on that but what about a Design issue ? Not all Luggage issues stem from having the Manufacturer assemble the bag incorrectly.
If I have to pay for a repair maybe I can do that vs tossing the bag but nothing more frustrating to hear that this bag is discontinued and parts are not available. The 10-30% offered discount does not help since I am not planning on paying full retail anyway.
I am using a large Tumi and a Roll-on size Kirkland bag for my travels. Both get checked in because I don't like to carry-on a lot of bags. The Kirkland bag is at least 17 years old. I have used it a lot and it is holding up great. It has about 27 screws with locking nuts. I just tightened them all but non where missing vs the Tumi that has either self tapping screws or just machine screws that end up missing. I belief the Kirkland bag is US made since the fasteners seems to be standard size.
The Tumi retractable Handle base developed a large crack but is still usable and I plan on getting it fixed asap just need the time to get it to the shop. I believe the Handle is not covered under items that can be claimed against damaged caused by the airline.
I have a great repair shop close by that is very familiar with Tumi (and perhaps others) I believe this also makes a big difference vs working with a retail store and having to send out everything for repairs.
#72
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Programs: AA, UAL, JetBlue
Posts: 9
The Victorinox Tourbach line is very nicely done. The fabric is even tougher than the older Mobilizer fabric. I don't like those caster wheels for carry-on. I think they're too prone for breakage. For 22" luggage and smaller, it should be a 2-wheel design.