Opinons of this Sony point and shoot?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Opinons of this Sony point and shoot?
I hope this is the appropriate place for this question.
I don't have any photography expertise, and I don't really have time to get into learning how to use anything but a point and shoot right now. I currently have a Sony DSC-N2 with a Carl Zeiss lens which I've had for years and love to death. It takes clear, crisp photos and I can get great 8x10 prints of every photo. Overall, I'm constantly amazed at the quality of photos that I can take with it. There are only two issues:
(1) the optical zoom is only 3x, which has frustrated me in the past when trying to zoom in on something far away; and
(2) 8x10 prints are great, but I really want to be able to make crisp, clear, good (not just "acceptable") larger prints (as large as 24"x36" or a standard equivalent).
So I'm in the market for a zoomier camera, but I don't want to give up on the quality I've experienced with my current Sony and I don't want to spend more than $300. I've been looking at the Sony DSC-WX300 because it's in my price range at $230, has 20x zoom and 18.2MP (which I know isn't a huge factor), and I've had one good experience with Sony so far.
For you photography folks, what do you think about the camera? Is there a point and shoot from another company that you would recommend over this one? I've looked into Canons, and they seem great, but I'm hesitant to try a new camera brand when I've had it so good with Sony thus far. Reviews online are also very mixed. If anyone can recommend a camera that meets the following criteria, or can offer input on the Sony DSC-WX300, please post!
Criteria for camera:
- Point and shoot
- 15+ optical zoom
- Rechargeable batter (no AA batteries please - nonnegotiable)
- Can take great quality photos for large (and small) prints
- Fast-ish processing time (Nikon point and shoots I've played with seem slow compared to my current Sony, for example)
- Stable zoom
- Great autofocus
- $300 or under
Thanks for any advice you can offer!
I don't have any photography expertise, and I don't really have time to get into learning how to use anything but a point and shoot right now. I currently have a Sony DSC-N2 with a Carl Zeiss lens which I've had for years and love to death. It takes clear, crisp photos and I can get great 8x10 prints of every photo. Overall, I'm constantly amazed at the quality of photos that I can take with it. There are only two issues:
(1) the optical zoom is only 3x, which has frustrated me in the past when trying to zoom in on something far away; and
(2) 8x10 prints are great, but I really want to be able to make crisp, clear, good (not just "acceptable") larger prints (as large as 24"x36" or a standard equivalent).
So I'm in the market for a zoomier camera, but I don't want to give up on the quality I've experienced with my current Sony and I don't want to spend more than $300. I've been looking at the Sony DSC-WX300 because it's in my price range at $230, has 20x zoom and 18.2MP (which I know isn't a huge factor), and I've had one good experience with Sony so far.
For you photography folks, what do you think about the camera? Is there a point and shoot from another company that you would recommend over this one? I've looked into Canons, and they seem great, but I'm hesitant to try a new camera brand when I've had it so good with Sony thus far. Reviews online are also very mixed. If anyone can recommend a camera that meets the following criteria, or can offer input on the Sony DSC-WX300, please post!
Criteria for camera:
- Point and shoot
- 15+ optical zoom
- Rechargeable batter (no AA batteries please - nonnegotiable)
- Can take great quality photos for large (and small) prints
- Fast-ish processing time (Nikon point and shoots I've played with seem slow compared to my current Sony, for example)
- Stable zoom
- Great autofocus
- $300 or under
Thanks for any advice you can offer!
#2
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 4,866
youre aksing for quite a lot. 20x zoom on that camera is slow, so the picture will be prone to motion blur and also diffraction from the small sensor. they wont make nice prints at 24x36
sticking with sony there is the rx10, but it costs significantly more than your target spend
sticking with sony there is the rx10, but it costs significantly more than your target spend