Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Special Interest Travel > Travel with Pets
Reload this Page >

Increased fees for military to transfer pets

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Increased fees for military to transfer pets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2012, 11:55 am
  #1  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26,541
Increased fees for military to transfer pets

Received the following article from a relative who is full time military and very concerned about these proposed new fees.
http://www.stripes.com/news/shipping...9#dsq-comments
obscure2k is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2012, 12:20 pm
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Yikes! Those fees are outrageous. I hope DoD can do something to convince UA/CO to lower their rates for pets for military.
kipper is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2012, 6:55 am
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: DL FO, Marriott Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 12,003
If UA gets enough negative comments in the social media it will back off these ridiculous charges!
RSSrsvp is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2012, 10:23 pm
  #4  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26,541
Originally Posted by RSSrsvp
If UA gets enough negative comments in the social media it will back off these ridiculous charges!
This is not exactly a love letter.
http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...-sticker-shock

I do take this personally, as my nephew and his family have been posted in Asia with their children and dogs. They are currently in the U.S. My niece first brought this issue to my attention.
obscure2k is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2012, 6:28 am
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Originally Posted by obscure2k
This is not exactly a love letter.
http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...-sticker-shock

I do take this personally, as my nephew and his family have been posted in Asia with their children and dogs. They are currently in the U.S. My niece first brought this issue to my attention.
I think that if they don't revise the fees, unfortunately, there will be a lot of family pets left behind.
kipper is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2012, 1:47 pm
  #6  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Originally Posted by obscure2k
This is not exactly a love letter.
http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...-sticker-shock

I do take this personally, as my nephew and his family have been posted in Asia with their children and dogs. They are currently in the U.S. My niece first brought this issue to my attention.
http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs...-abc-news.html

This one isn't exactly a "love letter" either.
kipper is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2012, 3:48 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Sounds like United is about to get increasingly ripped in public for adopting what they are saying is CO's "PetSafe" approach of checked in pets being counted as special cargo instead of against the regulary checked baggage allowance with special fees for pet. It's a headline story in more and more media outlets, online and off.

Again classify the pets as checked baggage with a fee instead of as cargo, and the cost of transporting the pets drops tremendously?

Isn't this topic being discussed in the UA forum?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2012, 4:41 pm
  #8  
Moderator: Delta SkyMiles, Luxury Hotels, TravelBuzz! and Italy
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 26,541
UA backtracked:^

http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...et-travel-rule
obscure2k is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2012, 4:51 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by obscure2k
... for those who are part of military deployment, UA has granted an exemption indeed. That's an improvement.

In most other ways UA's decision on this matter stands and customers with pets to transport will be worse off, as UA is sticking to the decision of adopting CO's policy and charging for pet transport as per CO's policy -- something that is far more expensive for customers in terms of money and/or time than pre-merger UA's policy.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Feb 25, 2012, 10:10 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: DL FO, Marriott Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 12,003
“After all the feedback we were getting, we realized the impact of the change in policy,” Ryan said, “specifically in Japan with the third-party freight forwarding fees. We’ve developed a special process for these families by which they can technically check pets as luggage.”

I love the part where UA says, We’ve developed a special process. Basically they are still ripping off anyone not traveling on military orders.
RSSrsvp is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.