Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

USA Today: Sen. McCaskill introduces bill against hidden resort fees

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

USA Today: Sen. McCaskill introduces bill against hidden resort fees

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2016, 9:49 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ATL
Programs: SPG gold; otherwise just base in everything so far, but learning!
Posts: 489
USA Today: Sen. McCaskill introduces bill against hidden resort fees

http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel...fees/80935922/

I wonder where this will go. I think the hotels should just increase it in the rate advertised. After all, it's not charged per person (I hope they don't get any ideas!) and is clearly not optional.

We spent five nights at the Walt Disney World Swan in November, using SPG points. Annoying that between parking and resort fees, it was still $250 or so!

At least with the airlines, one could argue that not everyone checks a bag (a whole other discussion...) but with the hotels, it's mandatory!
fuzz is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2016, 10:17 am
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,232
Thank goodness that, per the article, this bill isn't about disclosing resort fees. They're already usually disclosed. This bill is about prohibiting them: requiring an advertised room rate to be the rate you end up paying if you don't voluntarily ask for something optional. It's about time someone ended this scam.
Efrem is offline  
Old Feb 26, 2016, 3:02 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,385
Originally Posted by Efrem
Thank goodness that, per the article, this bill isn't about disclosing resort fees. They're already usually disclosed. This bill is about prohibiting them: requiring an advertised room rate to be the rate you end up paying if you don't voluntarily ask for something optional. It's about time someone ended this scam.
This whole thing reminds me of the "energy surcharge" that hotels tried to tack on a few years ag. After a class action lawsuit or two that absurd practice ended. This one should too.
Xyzzy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.