True Cost of Transporting a $25 Checked Bag? About $2!!
#1
Used to be 'FTcadence'
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SAN
Posts: 432
True Cost of Transporting a $25 Checked Bag? About $2!!
In 2008, many airlines began charging for checked baggage and placed the blame for the new fee on high jet fuel costs. Last year (Q1-Q3 only), those checked bag fees added up to $2.5 million. Since 2008, airlines have collected almost $18 billion in checked bag fees.
http://www.freep.com/article/20140202/COL21/302020020
If only the writer'd made a better attempt at calculating the infrastructure and labor costs and factored those in as well...
But how much does it actually cost an airline in jet fuel to transport your suitcase? About $2 and maybe less...
If only the writer'd made a better attempt at calculating the infrastructure and labor costs and factored those in as well...
Last edited by TravelingPeanut; Feb 2, 2014 at 9:29 am
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 30,949
The story even noted that there are many components other than fuel that should be included in a fully-costed analysis. Their response? "Still".
I.e. - that's too much work and wouldn't make as good a "consumers being ripped off" story, so we'll just ignore it.
I'm in favor of paying for what you use - why should I pay the baggage cost bundled into my ticket if I only have carry-on. But the cost/margin needs to be fair for all components. I'm still looking for a well-done version of this lame "analysis".
I.e. - that's too much work and wouldn't make as good a "consumers being ripped off" story, so we'll just ignore it.
I'm in favor of paying for what you use - why should I pay the baggage cost bundled into my ticket if I only have carry-on. But the cost/margin needs to be fair for all components. I'm still looking for a well-done version of this lame "analysis".
#3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: LAX, formerly SFO, PEK, PVG, NRT
Posts: 164
Meh, this is an over simplistic calculation.
No different than attacking your local bakery for charging $3 for a croissant that costs pennies to make.
ALL businesses have to charge significantly more than their cost of goods to finance all the things that don't generate revenue.
Plus, as CPRich mentions, the calculation is much more complicated than just fuel costs.
No different than attacking your local bakery for charging $3 for a croissant that costs pennies to make.
ALL businesses have to charge significantly more than their cost of goods to finance all the things that don't generate revenue.
Plus, as CPRich mentions, the calculation is much more complicated than just fuel costs.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike...
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,316
$2 might be the incremental cost of adding one additional bag, but it hardly accounts for all of the things necessary to handle checked baggage.
Last edited by cblaisd; Feb 14, 2014 at 8:29 am Reason: Corrected non-standard orthography for the sake of future searching
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Why repost this sort of naive analysis? The incremental cost of one extra pax isn't what one ticket costs either. So what?
Supply & demand determine pricing, not some simplistic analysis of what one extra bag costs. And, the analysis also fails to include the underlying cost, e.g., somebody has to actually go out and buy an aircraft in the first place.
Supply & demand determine pricing, not some simplistic analysis of what one extra bag costs. And, the analysis also fails to include the underlying cost, e.g., somebody has to actually go out and buy an aircraft in the first place.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: HH Gold, AA Gold
Posts: 10,449
This is an opinion piece wrapped around exactly one piece of data, which was an "extrapolation". This blog or opinion column is really NOT news at all.
While marginal costs are important in revenue management in the airline industry, they also have tremendous overhead and infrastructure costs that they also must pay. Frankly, if you've noticed, the airlines have recently been profitable ONLY becasue of the fees. The fares simply don't cover the total cost of running the airline, even with the tremendous technology-based efficiencies that airlines have taken advantage of over the past quarter century (e.g online reservations, online check-in, check-in kiosks at the airport, etc. have cut down tremendously on the number of airport employees required).
While marginal costs are important in revenue management in the airline industry, they also have tremendous overhead and infrastructure costs that they also must pay. Frankly, if you've noticed, the airlines have recently been profitable ONLY becasue of the fees. The fares simply don't cover the total cost of running the airline, even with the tremendous technology-based efficiencies that airlines have taken advantage of over the past quarter century (e.g online reservations, online check-in, check-in kiosks at the airport, etc. have cut down tremendously on the number of airport employees required).