Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel News
Reload this Page >

Randy Petersen lead plaintiff on 200M mile lawsuit against US and HA portals

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Randy Petersen lead plaintiff on 200M mile lawsuit against US and HA portals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2012, 10:13 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,393
Randy Petersen lead plaintiff on 200M mile lawsuit against US and HA portals

Couldn't find this being discussed anywhere on FT.

The story

The names on this lawsuit are quite interesting; several will be recognizable to established FTers.

I have mixed feelings on this lawsuit. Very curious as to what others think.
hobo13 is online now  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 12:00 am
  #2  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
You can read the Milepoint thread:
Boycott USAIRWAYS Shopping Mall- LAWSUIT filed
tom911 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 1:52 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BKK
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,088
Whose representing them?
blackmamba is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 7:09 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 342
The firms mentioned in the suit are Fogelman & Fogelman of Newton, MA and Rishwain Law Group of LA.
FormalHall is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 7:28 am
  #5  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Between AMS and BRU
Posts: 8,852
Greedy SOB's...
RTW1 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 7:32 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 342
I'm sure it is an ambit claim which if successful would set an interesting precedent. I'm not sure they have high expectations of being successful; I suspect their representatives are not from particularly major firms.
FormalHall is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 7:39 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
Originally Posted by FormalHall
I'm sure it is an ambit claim which if successful would set an interesting precedent. I'm not sure they have high expectations of being successful...
But it's high time merchants' refusals to honor published bonus offers (whether a poorly designed offer blows up in their face, or due to incompetence or just plain dishonesty) got litigated.

As for the airlines, they're displaying the same two-faced behavior they show when promoting codeshares or regional affiliates. Happy to splash their brand on everything until something goes wrong, then they claim they have nothing to do with it.
BearX220 is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 8:35 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: BKK
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,088
IMO, I don't see this case going very far, but just getting this into court and letting people know how the airlines are taking miles away from frequent fliers is a victory already.
blackmamba is offline  
Old Nov 4, 2012, 9:00 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA Gold-MM, AA Gold-MM, F9-Silver, Hyatt Something, Marriott Gold, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,393
Originally Posted by tom911
You can read the Milepoint thread:
Boycott USAIRWAYS Shopping Mall- LAWSUIT filed
Considering the lead plaintiff, I would think there could be conflicts of interest in discussing this case on MilePoint. Thus I started this thread. But definitely good to read the summary over there.
hobo13 is online now  
Old Nov 5, 2012, 1:06 am
  #10  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,447
Originally Posted by hobo13
Randy Peterson
Originally Posted by hobo13
The names on this lawsuit are quite interesting; several will be recognizable to established FTers.
As will the spelling errors.

Thanks for sharing the news nevertheless.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2012, 7:25 am
  #11  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,026
Name corrected.

cblaisd
Moderator, Travel News
cblaisd is offline  
Old Nov 5, 2012, 6:07 pm
  #12  
Moderator: CommunityBuzz!, OMNI, OMNI/PR, and OMNI/Games & FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ORD (MDW stinks)
Programs: UAMM, AAMM & ExPlat, Marriott lifetime Plat, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 23,506
Originally Posted by RTW1
Greedy SOB's...
I'm sure the same could be said about many on FT & MP. Greed is in the eye of the beholder and I'm sure that if this promo/oops was more widely known, there would be many more on lawsuits like this.
Sweet Willie is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2012, 3:37 pm
  #13  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Between AMS and BRU
Posts: 8,852
Not really... It's one thing to use a "mistake", but it's quite another to abuse it first (in an unsurpassed way) and then to sue. Probably to extort some kind of settlement.

Shows exactly what kind of person you really are in my opinion.
RTW1 is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2012, 7:16 pm
  #14  
Moderator: CommunityBuzz!, OMNI, OMNI/PR, and OMNI/Games & FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ORD (MDW stinks)
Programs: UAMM, AAMM & ExPlat, Marriott lifetime Plat, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 23,506
Originally Posted by RTW1
Not really... It's one thing to use a "mistake", but it's quite another to abuse it first (in an unsurpassed way) and then to sue. Probably to extort some kind of settlement.
clearly you & I do not see this issue the same way.

Somehow you've made these people out to be nefarious in nature by the magnitude with which they tried to use a promo that was offered. They didn't create the promo or do something illegal (as I read it).

I'm not sure how someone that uses a 'mistake' is a better person.
Sweet Willie is offline  
Old Nov 6, 2012, 8:55 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MSP, NYC, or WAS
Programs: AA CO DL
Posts: 717
Originally Posted by Sweet Willie
clearly you & I do not see this issue the same way.

Somehow you've made these people out to be nefarious in nature by the magnitude with which they tried to use a promo that was offered. They didn't create the promo or do something illegal (as I read it).

I'm not sure how someone that uses a 'mistake' is a better person.
I can't agree with you but don't ask me why....this is a big can of worms. What is legal and what is right it seems do not always match !!
airboss is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.