A300 service on THAI ending this year
#16
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne/Bangkok
Programs: A3*G, QF PLATINUM, BA GOLD, VA GOLD, HH DIAMOND
Posts: 2,245
#17
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YVR - Vancouver, with most winter weekends in Whistler.
Programs: Aeroplan 35K, Alaska MVP, Marriott Titanium / Lifetime Platinum, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 4,607
Thai must be the last Star Alliance carrier flying an A300?
Iran Air still fly's them? No?
Iran Air still fly's them? No?
#19
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne/Bangkok
Programs: A3*G, QF PLATINUM, BA GOLD, VA GOLD, HH DIAMOND
Posts: 2,245
It's been mentioned (by me) at least half a dozen times but some of Thai's A300's are made in 1998 and NEWER than some of the B777's (Thai's 777s date from 1996) and many of the B747's (from 1990 on). So there has been no reason for Thai to retire aircraft that are only 15 years old even now. They just needed a new business class cabin really.
#20
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: Free agent!
Posts: 1,423
However, I think I'd rather fly Y on the A300 for such a short sector instead of C on the 734 just to be able to check the A300 off my list. I suspect that someday someone on FT will rue their failed last chance at flying the 734
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: body: A stone's throw from SFO, mind: SE Asia
Programs: Some of this 'n some of that
Posts: 17,263
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,341
It's been mentioned (by me) at least half a dozen times but some of Thai's A300's are made in 1998 and NEWER than some of the B777's (Thai's 777s date from 1996) and many of the B747's (from 1990 on). So there has been no reason for Thai to retire aircraft that are only 15 years old even now. They just needed a new business class cabin really.
Also, the 772s and 747s can fly missions that the A300 cannot do (longer intercontinental ones), which is why they get kept around. The A300 is a tweener.
#23
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 589
It's been mentioned (by me) at least half a dozen times but some of Thai's A300's are made in 1998 and NEWER than some of the B777's (Thai's 777s date from 1996) and many of the B747's (from 1990 on). So there has been no reason for Thai to retire aircraft that are only 15 years old even now. They just needed a new business class cabin really.
Some of the birds look really ok inside. I mean the wall pannels, the overhead bins, even the lavs are acceptable for short/mid-range flights.
Fancy thought (but won't work for a lot of reasons): Put in the old velvet-class seats from the 7442.
#25
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne/Bangkok
Programs: A3*G, QF PLATINUM, BA GOLD, VA GOLD, HH DIAMOND
Posts: 2,245
The point I'm making is that these were not ancient 1980s aircraft that were overdue for retirement. Some of them are younger than Thai 747's and 777's. So yes they may not be as fuel efficient as an A320 ( which first entered service 10 years before Thai's newest A300 rolled off the production line) but they were not old aircraft.
#26
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,577
The point I'm making is that these were not ancient 1980s aircraft that were overdue for retirement. Some of them are younger than Thai 747's and 777's. So yes they may not be as fuel efficient as an A320 ( which first entered service 10 years before Thai's newest A300 rolled off the production line) but they were not old aircraft.
#28
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Melbourne
Programs: Velocity Gold
Posts: 1,069
A300 service on THAI ending this year
Why don't Thai get some narrow bodies and put in a proper business class to use on the regional routes. SIN, PNH, SGN, HAN, DPS, RGN, etc. would make sense to increase frequency but still have a proper J class. The wide bodies on these routes rarely seem to be full.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,341
Why don't Thai get some narrow bodies and put in a proper business class to use on the regional routes. SIN, PNH, SGN, HAN, DPS, RGN, etc. would make sense to increase frequency but still have a proper J class. The wide bodies on these routes rarely seem to be full.
Now, maybe there is a large market where people want to pay twice or three times the cost of a coach seat for a one hour flight where they get free booze and free blast-chilled food that the airline is selling at 5000% markup, plus a somewhat more comfortable seat, simply because of conspicuous consumption, and maybe it's a market that would be wildly popular in Thailand... but I'll just point out that the models for airlines that have exploded in the past 30 years are Southwest, Ryanair and AirAsia. None of those airlines are full service airlines...
#30
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne/Bangkok
Programs: A3*G, QF PLATINUM, BA GOLD, VA GOLD, HH DIAMOND
Posts: 2,245
European airlines fly in countries with much higher per capita incomes, and don't have "proper business class" for flights of similar stage lengths on their narrowbodies. USA airlines do (sort of), but a lot of those seats are filled with free upgrades from cheap coach tickets.
Now, maybe there is a large market where people want to pay twice or three times the cost of a coach seat for a one hour flight where they get free booze and free blast-chilled food that the airline is selling at 5000% markup, plus a somewhat more comfortable seat, simply because of conspicuous consumption, and maybe it's a market that would be wildly popular in Thailand... but I'll just point out that the models for airlines that have exploded in the past 30 years are Southwest, Ryanair and AirAsia. None of those airlines are full service airlines...
Now, maybe there is a large market where people want to pay twice or three times the cost of a coach seat for a one hour flight where they get free booze and free blast-chilled food that the airline is selling at 5000% markup, plus a somewhat more comfortable seat, simply because of conspicuous consumption, and maybe it's a market that would be wildly popular in Thailand... but I'll just point out that the models for airlines that have exploded in the past 30 years are Southwest, Ryanair and AirAsia. None of those airlines are full service airlines...
Well this is a different region and narrow body aircraft with proper J works fine for Malaysia, Silkair, Vietnam Airlines, Qantas, Virgin Australia, Vietnam Airlines, ANA, Dragonair etc etc. the list goes on.
Thai have made a stupid decision here.