Last edit by: JDiver
Post #116 by the Community Director:
"I've no plans to close the forum."
It's great to see new voices in this thread. Some have just learned of the Smoking Forum and hopefully will now use it. For the many reasons listed above:
I've no plans to close the forum.
Carol
Community Director
"I've no plans to close the forum."
It's great to see new voices in this thread. Some have just learned of the Smoking Forum and hopefully will now use it. For the many reasons listed above:
- It's a resource forum that doesn't require give and take conversation to be of value
- Smoking has become a negative topic in general. This forum is a safe haven for discussion.
- It doesn't take resources from other forums
I've no plans to close the forum.
Carol
Community Director
Closing the Smoking Section Forum [Update: it will stay open]
#61
Suspended
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: The electrified part of North Carolina
Programs: UA GM, AA GM, DL GM
Posts: 4,157
I don't know if 891 total posts in the Smokers Lounge forum and 500+ posts discussing the forum is an indicator of any widespread interest, but at least the forum has more posts than the Antarctica forum.
Last edited by UA1K_no_more; Aug 12, 2016 at 1:54 pm
#62
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
/JDiver, Moderator
#63
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
smokers get harassed a lot in other forums, so there is not really any comparison
i do not recall what was said (in smoking forum threads) re creation of GLBT forum
...there is always room to discuss the basis/rationale/etc of an opinion, including quantitatively
i do not recall what was said (in smoking forum threads) re creation of GLBT forum
...there is always room to discuss the basis/rationale/etc of an opinion, including quantitatively
Last edited by JDiver; Aug 18, 2016 at 4:33 pm Reason: Redacted previously deleted post content
#64
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Posts that use unwelcoming or offensive characterizations of other FlyerTalk members or use phraseology that states another member's opinion is invalid are clear violations of the Rules: see Abusive Or Disruptive Behavior Or Content (link) and as such will generally be deleted.
"Play the ball, not the player."
JDiver, Moderator
"Play the ball, not the player."
JDiver, Moderator
#65
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,917
I find the idea to close a useful forum, even if lightly-trafficed, a very odd one.
A consolidated place for smoking information makes sense and is bound to be small as smoking has gone from vogue to vilified and it is increasingly difficult to find places to smoke in the West.
I suggest that those who wish to remove focus instead on more pressing matters than dismantling something that is useful and has a volunteer moderator who enjoys moderating it.
A consolidated place for smoking information makes sense and is bound to be small as smoking has gone from vogue to vilified and it is increasingly difficult to find places to smoke in the West.
I suggest that those who wish to remove focus instead on more pressing matters than dismantling something that is useful and has a volunteer moderator who enjoys moderating it.
#66
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
I find the idea to close a useful forum, even if lightly-trafficed, a very odd one.
A consolidated place for smoking information makes sense and is bound to be small as smoking has gone from vogue to vilified and it is increasingly difficult to find places to smoke in the West.
I suggest that those who wish to remove focus instead on more pressing matters than dismantling something that is useful and has a volunteer moderator who enjoys moderating it.
A consolidated place for smoking information makes sense and is bound to be small as smoking has gone from vogue to vilified and it is increasingly difficult to find places to smoke in the West.
I suggest that those who wish to remove focus instead on more pressing matters than dismantling something that is useful and has a volunteer moderator who enjoys moderating it.
#67
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atherton, CA
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Owner, Green Bay Packers
Posts: 21,690
The smoking forum is a source of information for those who need it, and has zero negative effects on those of us who don't. In fact, one could argue that letting the smokers know where smoking is allowed in public accommodations lets them avoid doing so where it would affect the rest of us.
#68
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WAS (IAD, DCA, BWI)
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Platinum, WN CP
Posts: 245
My vote is to keep this forum open. Please do not close it.
#69
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLL -> Where The Boyars Are
Programs: AA EXP 1.7 M, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, AARP Sophomore, 14-time Croix de Candlestick
Posts: 18,669
Another supporter of keeping it open. It is not at all frivolous, and can help travelers in planning layovers, for example.
#70
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: GYD
Programs: Azerbaijan Airlines Gold, Turkish Miles and Smiles, IHG Plat
Posts: 663
Please keep it open.
#71
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
some who want to close smoking forum want to close other forums as well
there is a philosophical divide - more forums / organization vs less forums
there is a philosophical divide - more forums / organization vs less forums
Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Aug 19, 2016 at 1:38 pm
#72
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Bregenz, Austria
Programs: AA, BAEC, Alaska, Flying Blue, United, IHG, Hilton
Posts: 2,950
The lobbying for the Smoking Lounge to be closed (and the lobbying seems to be coming from very few people) seems to be a classic case of "This doesn't interest me, so I don't want anyone else to have it either". Very childish.
I'm not gay, but I don't object to the LGBT Forum, as I'm sure it provides useful information for those who want it.
I'm also not a woman, but I have no objection to the Women Travelers' forum.
I'm not disabled, etc.
Come on, people. Live and let live.
#73
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges and Environmentally Friendly Travel
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 22,212
While I am very pleased to read the posts in support of the Smoking Lounge forum, the reality is the forum is flatlining.
One recent thread, migrated in from the UK and Ireland forum contains an enlightened discussion plus very useful datapoints but has not received a single post during its tenure in the Smoking Lounge forum. This indicates three issues: 1) awareness of the smoking lounge forum, or more accurately lack of; 2) an unwillingness by members to post in the forum; 3) that smoking related topics can generate positive engagement and discussion when posted in other forums
One recent thread, migrated in from the UK and Ireland forum contains an enlightened discussion plus very useful datapoints but has not received a single post during its tenure in the Smoking Lounge forum. This indicates three issues: 1) awareness of the smoking lounge forum, or more accurately lack of; 2) an unwillingness by members to post in the forum; 3) that smoking related topics can generate positive engagement and discussion when posted in other forums
#74
Moderator, Finnair
Join Date: May 2011
Location: MMX (CPH)
Programs: Eurobonus Diamond, QR Gold, AY+ Platinum, A3*G, Nordic Choice Lifetime Platinum, SJ Prio Black
Posts: 14,168
I think a low number of posts does not always tell the whole picture. A forum can be home to a lot of members who currently does not have a lot to discuss.
However, to me this (my bolding)
is indicative of a forum so sparsely inhabited it does not really work.
Now and then I wander off to a remote part of FT, to learn about a destination new to me or prior to flying/staying in an airline/a hotel or the first time. If I can't find the information I'm looking for, I drop a question to the forum, confident of getting good answers. And I can't remember even once being let down - most forums have an answer for me within hours, many within minutes.
While taking part in FT discussions is good fun, educational, invigorating and/or entertaining I think the ability to get expert answers is a kick-posterior function that sets FT above all else. And for that reason I think densely populated forums are better than sparsely.
Just my two cents.
However, to me this (my bolding)
...My observation of the Smoking Lounge is of a few members who swing by, post a recent hotel or airport data point then make a sharp exit. Consequently the forum is only receiving one way traffic which may explain why questions posted by members sit for weeks without a single answer or even a consolatory response.
...
...
Now and then I wander off to a remote part of FT, to learn about a destination new to me or prior to flying/staying in an airline/a hotel or the first time. If I can't find the information I'm looking for, I drop a question to the forum, confident of getting good answers. And I can't remember even once being let down - most forums have an answer for me within hours, many within minutes.
While taking part in FT discussions is good fun, educational, invigorating and/or entertaining I think the ability to get expert answers is a kick-posterior function that sets FT above all else. And for that reason I think densely populated forums are better than sparsely.
Just my two cents.
#75
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,107
As I noted previously I'm not supportive of closing the smoking forum, as I believe it is a forum where (for reasons Dovster & others have explained upthread) discussions are less apt to happen vs. threads w/ information are available & get a lot of views.
FWIW - I've not seen a groundswell by TB members to close the forum. To me it serves a niche, just as some of our niche forums do.
It also provides a safe forum so if someone does post on a smoking topic they don't get attacked by the non-smokers, as we've seen happen in many forums (probably next to tipping, smoking gets the most vehement & mudslinging posts in forums/takes them sideways).
Cheers.
FWIW - I've not seen a groundswell by TB members to close the forum. To me it serves a niche, just as some of our niche forums do.
It also provides a safe forum so if someone does post on a smoking topic they don't get attacked by the non-smokers, as we've seen happen in many forums (probably next to tipping, smoking gets the most vehement & mudslinging posts in forums/takes them sideways).
Cheers.