Further subdivision of Mileage Run Forum?
#1
formerly mattking2000
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DXB
Programs: BA|AC|AZ|SPG|H|FPC
Posts: 1,187
Further subdivision of Mileage Run Forum?
On the main MR forum, there are a lot of threads (8 on the first page as of this post) that are wholly within the US. Would it make sense to separate these into a separate sub-forum, much like the Premium fare deals one?
Reasons for:
1. Domestic US MRs are favourable for some (no need to bring passport/get visas/etc., domestic upgrades, people need ESTA/visa to enter US)
2. Domestic US MRs are sometimes unwanted by others (security theatre, the "food" or lack thereof, wanting to combine vacations with MR runs, etc.)
3. Visual appeal--it's often difficult to navigate airport codes when there are several lines of seemingly only US airports. E.g., I completely missed PEK here the first two times I glanced over it, although CPH was easily visible:
4. The running potential/mileage amounts for domestic vs. international are generally at different scales: LAX-BOS for instance garners 2611 miles, whereas LAX-PEK is 6251. Yes, a LAX-BOS-ANC might yield similar results but I'd argue a nonstop is much less hassle than one with several changes (and several potentials for error).
5. Generally different running tactics. US loyalty programs are (for now) structured much differently than other loyalty programs around the world, and particular(ly creative) domestic routings that may yield good returns on US programs may not reflect so in other programs.
Reasons against:
1. People will have another forum to check!
2. ?
I'd really appreciate any feedback
Reasons for:
1. Domestic US MRs are favourable for some (no need to bring passport/get visas/etc., domestic upgrades, people need ESTA/visa to enter US)
2. Domestic US MRs are sometimes unwanted by others (security theatre, the "food" or lack thereof, wanting to combine vacations with MR runs, etc.)
3. Visual appeal--it's often difficult to navigate airport codes when there are several lines of seemingly only US airports. E.g., I completely missed PEK here the first two times I glanced over it, although CPH was easily visible:
4. The running potential/mileage amounts for domestic vs. international are generally at different scales: LAX-BOS for instance garners 2611 miles, whereas LAX-PEK is 6251. Yes, a LAX-BOS-ANC might yield similar results but I'd argue a nonstop is much less hassle than one with several changes (and several potentials for error).
5. Generally different running tactics. US loyalty programs are (for now) structured much differently than other loyalty programs around the world, and particular(ly creative) domestic routings that may yield good returns on US programs may not reflect so in other programs.
Reasons against:
1. People will have another forum to check!
2. ?
I'd really appreciate any feedback
#2
Ambassador, New England
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maineiac, USA
Programs: Amtrak, WN RR, Choice
Posts: 2,655
This sounds like something better suited for the Talkboard to consider, I've alerted a mod to move it there for their consideration.
#3
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
Indeed; thank you. It has been done.
/Moderator
/Moderator
#4
Moderator: Hilton Honors forums
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marietta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 24,997
...and we are ready to listen to feedback — either for or against — this proposal.
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,446
On the main MR forum, there are a lot of threads (8 on the first page as of this post) that are wholly within the US. Would it make sense to separate these into a separate sub-forum, much like the Premium fare deals one?
Reasons for:
1. Domestic US MRs are favourable for some (no need to bring passport/get visas/etc., domestic upgrades, people need ESTA/visa to enter US)
2. Domestic US MRs are sometimes unwanted by others (security theatre, the "food" or lack thereof, wanting to combine vacations with MR runs, etc.)
3. Visual appeal--it's often difficult to navigate airport codes when there are several lines of seemingly only US airports. E.g., I completely missed PEK here the first two times I glanced over it, although CPH was easily visible:
4. The running potential/mileage amounts for domestic vs. international are generally at different scales: LAX-BOS for instance garners 2611 miles, whereas LAX-PEK is 6251. Yes, a LAX-BOS-ANC might yield similar results but I'd argue a nonstop is much less hassle than one with several changes (and several potentials for error).
5. Generally different running tactics. US loyalty programs are (for now) structured much differently than other loyalty programs around the world, and particular(ly creative) domestic routings that may yield good returns on US programs may not reflect so in other programs.
Reasons against:
1. People will have another forum to check!
2. ?
I'd really appreciate any feedback
Reasons for:
1. Domestic US MRs are favourable for some (no need to bring passport/get visas/etc., domestic upgrades, people need ESTA/visa to enter US)
2. Domestic US MRs are sometimes unwanted by others (security theatre, the "food" or lack thereof, wanting to combine vacations with MR runs, etc.)
3. Visual appeal--it's often difficult to navigate airport codes when there are several lines of seemingly only US airports. E.g., I completely missed PEK here the first two times I glanced over it, although CPH was easily visible:
4. The running potential/mileage amounts for domestic vs. international are generally at different scales: LAX-BOS for instance garners 2611 miles, whereas LAX-PEK is 6251. Yes, a LAX-BOS-ANC might yield similar results but I'd argue a nonstop is much less hassle than one with several changes (and several potentials for error).
5. Generally different running tactics. US loyalty programs are (for now) structured much differently than other loyalty programs around the world, and particular(ly creative) domestic routings that may yield good returns on US programs may not reflect so in other programs.
Reasons against:
1. People will have another forum to check!
2. ?
I'd really appreciate any feedback
Also tying a domestic MR into an overseas journey would harder to spot if there were separate forums.
And it appears to tell international posters that their threads are cluttering the MR and don't deserve to be in the same forum which sends the wrong message to everyone who doesn't take or post wholly domestic U.S. MR's.
Sorry but I do not believe further dilution of the MR forum is either necessary or beneficial. Just MHO.
#6
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SFO/CDG
Posts: 320
I agree with tcook052 that confusion may occur with additional sub-forums and that they are probably unneeded.
The next part of my comment may be more for Technical Support and Feedback than TalkBoard Topics. If more specific categorization is necessary in the MR forum, is there be a way to tag posts by region (e.g. "Asia", "Europe") for domestic or intercontinental MRs and international (e.g. "International" CDG-LHR-DFW) for international MRs? I see in the expert hotel reviews forum, there are "Review" tags. Would there be a way to incorporate these tags, and allow posters to select the most relevant tag when posting?
Review tag in Expert Hotel Reviews:
The next part of my comment may be more for Technical Support and Feedback than TalkBoard Topics. If more specific categorization is necessary in the MR forum, is there be a way to tag posts by region (e.g. "Asia", "Europe") for domestic or intercontinental MRs and international (e.g. "International" CDG-LHR-DFW) for international MRs? I see in the expert hotel reviews forum, there are "Review" tags. Would there be a way to incorporate these tags, and allow posters to select the most relevant tag when posting?
Review tag in Expert Hotel Reviews:
#7
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
I think that even at the busiest of times the MR Forum isn't hard to wade through. As of now I'm not in favor of any further subdivisions.
#8
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,404
I can see the arguments for dividing MR into subfora MR--domestic USA only and MR--elsewhere where both would be subfora on the same "level" in the FT organizational chart. I'm guessing that Canada should be part of international here, but it's something to discuss.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,446
I can see the arguments for dividing MR into subfora MR--domestic USA only and MR--elsewhere where both would be subfora on the same "level" in the FT organizational chart. I'm guessing that Canada should be part of international here, but it's something to discuss.
#10
formerly mattking2000
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DXB
Programs: BA|AC|AZ|SPG|H|FPC
Posts: 1,187
There are more reasons that that against further subdivisions as all members but especially newer ones will not be sure where to post their query. More forums creates more confusion about where posts should be placed.
Also tying a domestic MR into an overseas journey would harder to spot if there were separate forums.
And it appears to tell international posters that their threads are cluttering the MR and don't deserve to be in the same forum which sends the wrong message to everyone who doesn't take or post wholly domestic U.S. MR's.
Sorry but I do not believe further dilution of the MR forum is either necessary or beneficial. Just MHO.
Also tying a domestic MR into an overseas journey would harder to spot if there were separate forums.
And it appears to tell international posters that their threads are cluttering the MR and don't deserve to be in the same forum which sends the wrong message to everyone who doesn't take or post wholly domestic U.S. MR's.
Sorry but I do not believe further dilution of the MR forum is either necessary or beneficial. Just MHO.
(b) I was originally intending to push the domestic US ones into a subfora It's not that domestic US are worse/better than other ones, it's just a way of categorising them. Much like premium fare deals -- they aren't "better" or "worse" categorically speaking, just different to normal ones.
I agree with tcook052 that confusion may occur with additional sub-forums and that they are probably unneeded.
The next part of my comment may be more for Technical Support and Feedback than TalkBoard Topics. If more specific categorization is necessary in the MR forum, is there be a way to tag posts by region (e.g. "Asia", "Europe") for domestic or intercontinental MRs and international (e.g. "International" CDG-LHR-DFW) for international MRs? I see in the expert hotel reviews forum, there are "Review" tags. Would there be a way to incorporate these tags, and allow posters to select the most relevant tag when posting?
Review tag in Expert Hotel Reviews:
The next part of my comment may be more for Technical Support and Feedback than TalkBoard Topics. If more specific categorization is necessary in the MR forum, is there be a way to tag posts by region (e.g. "Asia", "Europe") for domestic or intercontinental MRs and international (e.g. "International" CDG-LHR-DFW) for international MRs? I see in the expert hotel reviews forum, there are "Review" tags. Would there be a way to incorporate these tags, and allow posters to select the most relevant tag when posting?
Review tag in Expert Hotel Reviews:
I can see the arguments for dividing MR into subfora MR--domestic USA only and MR--elsewhere where both would be subfora on the same "level" in the FT organizational chart. I'm guessing that Canada should be part of international here, but it's something to discuss.