Motion Failed: Recommend new post thresholds and titles
#31
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,621
For what it's worth, it's quite rare for a proposal not to draw a second. TB members need to be careful in drafting (and I sometimes was not sufficiently careful), because that text may turn out to mean something other than what was intended. Vetting proposal text in private or public is always a good idea.
#32
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
This is how the situation went:
- Post 1: I suggested the vote
- Post 2: Seconded
- Post 3: Person A asks if I'm "suggesting" or formally moving
- Post 4: I say I want to formally move and explain why
- Post 5: TalkBoard President asks again if I'm formally moving and explains how the process usually goes
- Post 6: Person B makes suggestion
- Post 7: Person C makes more suggestions, and helps with the language
- Post 8: President responds to B and C
- Post 9: Person A has more questions
- Post 10: President responds to Person A
- Post 11: I make formal motion
- Post 12: Seconded
- Post 1: I suggested the vote
- Post 2: Seconded
- Post 3: Person A asks if I'm "suggesting" or formally moving
- Post 4: I say I want to formally move and explain why
- Post 5: TalkBoard President asks again if I'm formally moving and explains how the process usually goes
- Post 6: Person B makes suggestion
- Post 7: Person C makes more suggestions, and helps with the language
- Post 8: President responds to B and C
- Post 9: Person A has more questions
- Post 10: President responds to Person A
- Post 11: I make formal motion
- Post 12: Seconded
#33
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,598
Thanks for the background, bdschobel and kokonutz. You make a good case, and I appreciate that things can look different from outside.
I probably would vote Yes with you under these circumstances, even though I would prefer that supporters be given every possible chance to write the final version of a proposal and request a vote.
You sound as if you are giving priority to team building, laying the foundations for ongoing cooperation on TalkBoard. That's smart.
I probably would vote Yes with you under these circumstances, even though I would prefer that supporters be given every possible chance to write the final version of a proposal and request a vote.
You sound as if you are giving priority to team building, laying the foundations for ongoing cooperation on TalkBoard. That's smart.
Mens travel forum, here we come!!!!!! ^^^
#34
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SGF
Programs: AS, AA, UA, AGR S (former 75K, GLD, 1K, and S+, now an elite peon)
Posts: 23,194
Some of TalkBoard's most contentious times have occurred when a minority of members forced votes on proposals which they knew had insufficient support. I thought we had all learned the lesson that the minority can get more of what it wants through building consensus for a minimal version of the idea. Getting from a minority to 2/3 can be done this way. The prime example of this is term limits.
But on the other hand, the TalkBoard was recently criticized pretty severely by another former TalkBoard member for showing no action on this or other issues. Apparently, back in the "good old days," stuff went to a vote whether it had broad support or not, and some of the old-timers pine for those days of yore when at least it looked like TalkBoard was doing something. (I guess one thing everyone can learn from this discussion is that you can't please everybody.)
This proposal has, as koko indicated, languished without any action to speak of for far longer than a popular (and correct, IMNSHO) proposal should. At some point, the question needs to be called. I think that in some cases, this is the best--and perhaps only--way forward when no movement is otherwise indicated.
I, for one, am glad at least something is being done. If the motion fails, let's retool our efforts to address whatever issues were brought up during this process, address them, and try again. A "no" on this isn't necessarily a permanent "no."
#35
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,621
This is how the situation went:
- Post 1: I suggested the vote
- Post 2: Seconded
- Post 3: Person A asks if I'm "suggesting" or formally moving
- Post 4: I say I want to formally move and explain why
- Post 5: TalkBoard President asks again if I'm formally moving and explains how the process usually goes
- Post 6: Person B makes suggestion
- Post 7: Person C makes more suggestions, and helps with the language
- Post 8: President responds to B and C
- Post 9: Person A has more questions
- Post 10: President responds to Person A
- Post 11: I make formal motion
- Post 12: Seconded
- Post 1: I suggested the vote
- Post 2: Seconded
- Post 3: Person A asks if I'm "suggesting" or formally moving
- Post 4: I say I want to formally move and explain why
- Post 5: TalkBoard President asks again if I'm formally moving and explains how the process usually goes
- Post 6: Person B makes suggestion
- Post 7: Person C makes more suggestions, and helps with the language
- Post 8: President responds to B and C
- Post 9: Person A has more questions
- Post 10: President responds to Person A
- Post 11: I make formal motion
- Post 12: Seconded
This scenario is not a precedent for anything harmful to TalkBoard, so I retract my criticism. You took the lead in getting a consensus proposal to a vote, which I consider a best practice. As long as that's done, I agree that it does not matter who makes the formal motion. Thank you for your service on TalkBoard.
#36
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,539
Can't we be a bit more honest with the titles?
500: Beginner
1,000: Advanced beginner
2,500: Intermediate
5,000: Advanced
10,000: Should Be Committed
25,000: No Home Life
40,000: Has To Post In Every Thread
500: Beginner
1,000: Advanced beginner
2,500: Intermediate
5,000: Advanced
10,000: Should Be Committed
25,000: No Home Life
40,000: Has To Post In Every Thread
#38
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,598
But I prefer what we are voting on over the status quo. @:-)
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: UA Million Miler (lite). NY Metro area.
Posts: 15,075
Talk Board members... this is as good a time as any for you to read this >>> http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/talkb...alk-board.html
#40
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
And the most important lesson that I learned last week: you can't please everybody.
#41
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Home
Programs: AA, Delta, UA & thanks to FTers for my PC Gold!
Posts: 7,676
ps. FYI. It took 19 years before DSM-V, the latest version, was published. DSM-IV came out in 1994.
Isn't that the life lesson for anyone, FTer or not?
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,539
#43
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Durham, NC (RDU/GSO/CLT)
Programs: AA EXP/MM, DL GM, UA Platinum, HH DIA, Hyatt Explorist, IHG Platinum, Marriott Titanium, Hertz PC
Posts: 33,857
#45
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,045