re new forum proposals
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
re new forum proposals
if there is not something along these lines already, maybe have a "suggestion" that people who want a new forum start a thread in the most related existing forum where they and others start compiling a list of threads that they think would fit that new forum
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
also - forum creation can be about "creating" demand on FT, instead of meeting demand on FT (as 'demand' is currently defined) when there is demand on the internet and not really any good forums out there
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
would there be a reason not to consider formalizing the thought i raised in my original post?
is my original post clear?
is my original post clear?
#4
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,103
Cheers.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,797
what im saying is this >
"a forum request thread in TB forum must link a thread which contains links to threads/posts which one considers appropriate for the requested forum"
(or contain the links itself, which i recall one thread here doing, seem to recall it was one that eventually got a forum..)
the idea here is making things a little more concrete, and a little less abstract ('explain in x sentences/paragraphs or less about the demand there is')
this is actually much easier for those posting (and surely they have at least some threads/posts in mind when theyre posting..) as well as TB when looking at it (instead of lengthy back and forth to begin with, with little/no data)
"a forum request thread in TB forum must link a thread which contains links to threads/posts which one considers appropriate for the requested forum"
(or contain the links itself, which i recall one thread here doing, seem to recall it was one that eventually got a forum..)
the idea here is making things a little more concrete, and a little less abstract ('explain in x sentences/paragraphs or less about the demand there is')
this is actually much easier for those posting (and surely they have at least some threads/posts in mind when theyre posting..) as well as TB when looking at it (instead of lengthy back and forth to begin with, with little/no data)
Last edited by Kagehitokiri; Jun 28, 2012 at 7:52 am
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,103
what im saying is this >
"a forum request thread in TB forum must link a thread which contains links to threads/posts which one considers appropriate for the requested forum"
(or contain the links itself, which i recall one thread here doing, seem to recall it was one that eventually got a forum..)
the idea here is making things a little more concrete, and a little less abstract ('explain in x sentences/paragraphs or less about the demand there is')
this is actually much easier for those posting (and surely they have at least some threads/posts in mind when theyre posting..) as well as TB when looking at it (instead of lengthy back and forth to begin with, with little/no data)
"a forum request thread in TB forum must link a thread which contains links to threads/posts which one considers appropriate for the requested forum"
(or contain the links itself, which i recall one thread here doing, seem to recall it was one that eventually got a forum..)
the idea here is making things a little more concrete, and a little less abstract ('explain in x sentences/paragraphs or less about the demand there is')
this is actually much easier for those posting (and surely they have at least some threads/posts in mind when theyre posting..) as well as TB when looking at it (instead of lengthy back and forth to begin with, with little/no data)
While it certainly adds to argument for/adds validity, it's not absolutely required. And at times we're asked to consider a forum/take a bit of a leap of faith & as such, the threads might not exist. That's happened w/ a few forums, some of which have become quite active.
Again, I speak only for myself as a TB member. Others may feel differently (although my guess is at least a couple won't, since they already consider the 7 questions to be a bit of jumping through hoops ).
But thank you for your suggestion and wanting to help the process.
Cheers.
#8
Moderator: American AAdvantage
Join Date: May 2000
Location: NorCal - SMF area
Programs: AA LT Plat; HH LT Diamond, Maître-plongeur des Muccis
Posts: 62,948
For members who may not be completely oriented and wonder what is being addressed here, the post titled What is the TalkBoard and How are New Forums and Other Suggestions Considered? (link) will take one to the criteria TB has suggested for making a case for new fora.
#10
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878