Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

Motion Passed: Non-counting of Posts in a Games Forum

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Motion Passed: Non-counting of Posts in a Games Forum

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2012, 8:31 am
  #91  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,586
Originally Posted by SkiAdcock
I've done a check - there aren't actually that many game threads & they're in a forum that isn't open unless someone has 180/180, so I'm a bit perplexed on how 'all these game threads bring FT down'.

Cheers.
I tend to agree.

What's the phrase everyone keeps using: This appears to be a solution in search of a problem.

I get it that a deal was cut to get OMNI posts counting and then take the games to a non-counting forum, and that's fine for those in on the deal.

To me, though, I would rather a problem manifest before it gets fixed. I'm not the sort to remove a body part just to prevent it from eventually developing cancer.
kokonutz is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2012, 9:34 pm
  #92  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Programs: Hyatt Diamond, Fairmont Platinum, Aeroplan Diamond, HHonors Gold, SPG Gold
Posts: 18,686
Originally Posted by dhammer53
The gamers aren't here to talk miles and points. They're here to waste time.

Flyertalk is an incredible website. All these game threads bring FT down. Please note, I've participated once every blue moon in the game threads.

That's my 2 cents.
Flyertalk sometimes pulls up pretty slow during the traffic.. so an argument can be made that extra traffic is hurting efficiency of pulling up the website and keeping it free flowing for everyone..
Ancien Maestro is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 12:59 am
  #93  
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: TSA Refusenik charter member
Posts: 15,978
Originally Posted by Cholula
Hell, I can even rub my stomach, pat my head, moderate several forums and address several TB motions at the same time while sipping a beverage and eating a sandwich.
The mental tableaux here is just too precious.

Originally Posted by Ancien Maestro
Flyertalk sometimes pulls up pretty slow during the traffic.. so an argument can be made that extra traffic is hurting efficiency of pulling up the website and keeping it free flowing for everyone..
I remember a time when TS/S's traffic made OMNI's look like a funeral procession. Any well-trafficked forum can be the Pull Of The Day, not just OMNI.
essxjay is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 1:52 am
  #94  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: BA Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,809
Originally Posted by kipper
I'm sorry that you've decided to be offended, but that's your decision.

My comment was that to some, trip reports are meaningless. Not to everyone, but to some.
It's not my decision to be offended, your post was offensive. Next time someone says something to insult me I'm blame myself for being insulted shall I?

To suggest that trip reports are meaningless to some might be right. But here's the thing, counting games are meaningless to all but those who play them, and what's that about 10 people out of 300k members? So your argument does not stack up, I'm afraid.


Originally Posted by kipper
The European Rail Travel forum is, to me, meaningless, because I do not have a need for information provided in it
But other people do need and do use the information, so it is not meaningless. There is no information in game threads, they are meaningless by definition, as, they have no meaning because there is no content!

Originally Posted by kipper
No one is forcing you to visit the game threads, no one is forcing you to read them.
Correct, and I don't read them, there is nothing to read.

But what they will/have do/done is inflate people's post count, giving them an unfair position over others who actually contribute their knowledge to FT and try to help others. How is that fair?

Originally Posted by kipper
At least one of the counting threads has 74,917 views thus far. that's the only one currenlty on the first page of OMNI, I think because the others have been completed.
No doubt viewed by the people who posted. That doesn't mean anything.

Originally Posted by kipper
Post counts are corrupt now, and have been for years, between prior OMNI posts counting and all of the contest threads where people were entered to win a contest if they simply posted in a thread
So let's just make it worse then shall we?

Last edited by matthandy; Jan 24, 2012 at 2:06 am Reason: Spelling
matthandy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 2:28 am
  #95  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: BA Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,809
For a forum that is all about frequent flyer and hotel status I find it ironic that no-one in the TB community is able to see the problem with allowing certain members to cheat their way to flyertalk status. Arguements about whether or not this status means anything aside, the status is there, in the form of titles and post counts.

To those that say that 'games' build community, well, take a look at the latest counting game thread, it's here if you haven't seen it:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/omni/...00-a-1349.html

Flick back through the pages if you will. Most of them are filled with posts from one, or two people. For example, 98% of The_Banking_Scot's last 200 posts were on this thread. How can you anyone say that this builds the community if only one or two people (that clearly already know each other) participating? Can you build a community with one person? I think not.

Take away post counts and titles, it's the only logical solution to the entire situation. There will be no more arguements about 'corrupted post counts' or 'consistency' and people's contributions will solely be measured on their visibility and quality of their input in the forums that they participate in, which is exactly how it should be.
matthandy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 7:02 am
  #96  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,030
Originally Posted by matthandy
It's not my decision to be offended, your post was offensive. Next time someone says something to insult me I'm blame myself for being insulted shall I?

To suggest that trip reports are meaningless to some might be right. But here's the thing, counting games are meaningless to all but those who play them, and what's that about 10 people out of 300k members? So your argument does not stack up, I'm afraid.

But other people do need and do use the information, so it is not meaningless. There is no information in game threads, they are meaningless by definition, as, they have no meaning because there is no content!

Correct, and I don't read them, there is nothing to read.

But what they will/have do/done is inflate people's post count, giving them an unfair position over others who actually contribute their knowledge to FT and try to help others. How is that fair?

No doubt viewed by the people who posted. That doesn't mean anything.

So let's just make it worse then shall we?
I cannot control if you are offended by something that is the truth--that trip reports or any other forum may be meaningless to some people on FT. Being offended about anything is a personal decision, and one you have decided to make.

I'm not saying simply counting games, but rather, some of the other OMNI games as well, hence why I say OMNI games, not "counting games." There are other games taking place in OMNI, and some have been cited to build community. Those do have information that is valuable to some, from discussing hotel options to train options, at a minimum.

Those who opt to contribute information in some of the game threads are contributing information to FT, much like that which can be found in many different forums.

Isolating a group of posters and doing away with consistency is not exactly a good solution, especially considering that they could have those same posts in a lounge forum and have it count.
kipper is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 8:26 am
  #97  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,586
I had hoped to have some time between when OMNI posts started counting and the deadline for this vote in order to gauge whether posters would 'abuse' games, or if there was a bit of chicken little going on with regard to counting game posts.

Alas, that period for observation is not forthcoming as OMNI posts are still not counting.

My feeling is that there is a lot of grey area in the definition of 'games' and that while some might just be a single poster counting, many do contribute significantly to the feeling of community on FlyerTalk (eg, Anyone Fancy a Game of Mornington Crescent, Who Will Be The Next FlyerTalk Member To Post? An OMNI Game, etc).

And ultimately I find it inconsistent to say that all posts should count...except that some shouldn't. There is no substantive difference between posting a random number in a game every day and posting 'hello, box' in a lounge thread every day.

So I voted no to this proposal, meaning I voted that yes posts in a hypothetical OMNI - Games forum SHOULD count (confusing, right!?).
kokonutz is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 12:19 pm
  #98  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Programs: UALifetimePremierGold, Marriott LifetimeTitanium
Posts: 71,103
Originally Posted by kokonutz
So I voted no to this proposal, meaning I voted that yes posts in a hypothetical OMNI - Games forum SHOULD count (confusing, right!?).
I voted the same.

As I mentioned earlier in the thread I was up in the air on this one. I read the posts for/against, and some valid arguments were made on both sides.

Ultimately I decided that we couldn't vote to have posts count in all FT forums and then turn around & immediately say well except for this one. I think we need to be consistent.

I also have enough faith in FTers for them to decide for themselves whether the content someone posts in a forum is valid based on what they say, and not just a # under their handle. I say this as someone who does post what I think is good information in the forums & doesn't play the games.

Cheers.
SkiAdcock is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 3:57 pm
  #99  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: BA Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,809
Originally Posted by kipper
I cannot control if you are offended by something that is the truth--that trip reports or any other forum may be meaningless to some people on FT. Being offended about anything is a personal decision, and one you have decided to make.
That's total nonsense, walk up to a lady in the street and call her 'fat'. Then tell her that it's her fault for being insulted. You aren't living in the real world if you honestly believe that, but it's clear we are never going to agree.

My point is about volumes and about content.

The number of people who may find trip reports meaningless is going to be significantly less than those that don't. Trip reports have content, therefore they have meaning. Counting games have no content!!

'Games' in general can build the community, I get that. Counting games however, add nothing. Or are you honestly trying to say that they do? It would be great to get an answer to that question from all of the supporters of games threads.

Why should some members be allowed to cheat their way to status? Or is the answer that we should all just do it to highlight the total nonsense the post counts have become?

On the consistency arguement: doing something for the sake of it, or to continue the status quo are rarely good enough reasons. I meet people in my job every day who just want the new product to be exactly the same as the old one. How does anyone or anything grow and develop if we just continue with the same old ideas and concepts? So, the consistency arguement doesn't wash with me.
matthandy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 4:14 pm
  #100  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,346
Originally Posted by matthandy
Why should some members be allowed to cheat their way to status? Or is the answer that we should all just do it to highlight the total nonsense the post counts have become?
To me this is no different than people who get MQMs from credit card spend. There will always be those on FT who consider those people to be "cheating" their way to status. Except "status" here at FT gets one no material benefits.

I consider all this animosity to be divisive. It's been a divisive issue since Randy flipped the switch in the middle of the night in 2008. I thought that this compromise would eliminate most of this animosity, but what I tend to forget is that there are a significant number of people who would eliminate OMNI entirely if it was up to them. Or marginalize it as much as possible. I dare say I probably don't represent those members on the TB.

For me, FT is about the community first. If forced to talk about nothing but points and miles, I'm convinced this community would've been nowhere near as successful as it's been.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 4:16 pm
  #101  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,346
BTW, I'm glad that in one week this conversation /debate will be over. Or sooner if missing votes come in, but I'm not counting on that.

Next time this topic is brought up, it will be by someone other than me. Promise.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 4:19 pm
  #102  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 1,653
Originally Posted by RichMSN
BTW, I'm glad that in one week this conversation /debate will be over. Or sooner if missing votes come in, but I'm not counting on that.

Next time this topic is brought up, it will be by someone other than me. Promise.
So is it a good bet that all votes will last the full 2 weeks from here on out?
DeaconFlyer is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 4:24 pm
  #103  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 15,346
Originally Posted by DeaconFlyer
So is it a good bet that all votes will last the full 2 weeks from here on out?
I'll let you read between the lines.
RichMSN is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 4:26 pm
  #104  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: BA Gold, SPG Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 3,809
Originally Posted by RichMSN
To me this is no different than people who get MQMs from credit card spend. There will always be those on FT who consider those people to be "cheating" their way to status. Except "status" here at FT gets one no material benefits.
It's not different, and it's still not right. So the fact that it's no different doesn't mean that it should be allowed to continue. Two wrongs and all that....

Originally Posted by RichMSN
I thought that this compromise would eliminate most of this animosity, but what I tend to forget is that there are a significant number of people who would eliminate OMNI entirely if it was up to them. Or marginalize it as much as possible. I dare say I probably don't represent those members on the TB.
I think it will, if it passes, although I am not sure it will pass, so the animosity will continue. I'm in favour of OMNI, and I don't think it should be eliminated, but let's actually give credit for posts that have some kind of meaning, rather than strings of numbers.
matthandy is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2012, 4:31 pm
  #105  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 1,653
Originally Posted by RichMSN
I'll let you read between the lines.
It's pretty amazing that a grown adult will react to the result of an election in this way. I wonder if they will ever grace us with another post in the TB forum.
DeaconFlyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.