Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Community > TalkBoard Topics
Reload this Page >

Motion Passed: Amend TalkBoard Guidelines, Winning TalkBoard Pres

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Motion Passed: Amend TalkBoard Guidelines, Winning TalkBoard Pres

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2011, 6:52 am
  #1  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Motion Passed: Amend TalkBoard Guidelines, Winning TalkBoard Pres

Moved by Markie and seconded by jackal:

The TalkBoard recommends that the following amendments be made to the TalkBoard Guidelines:

Section 3, paragraph ii, sub-paragraph c be replaced with the following text :

The presidential elections shall be conducted as follows: Any candidate garnering 2/3rd of the total TalkBoard vote in the primary presidential vote shall be immediately declared the winner. If there are more than 2 candidates in the primary vote and none receive 2/3rds of the total vote then a final vote shall be held between the top two vote-getters. In the final vote, the President shall be decided by a simple majority vote. If there are no more than two candidates for President, then there will be no primary election before the final vote and a simple majority will elect.


This vote will close on 20 Jan 2011.
Spiff is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 7:01 am
  #2  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
Here's what the original guidelines said:
c. The presidential elections shall be conducted as follows: Any candidate garnering more than 2/3 of the total TalkBoard vote in the primary presidential vote shall be immediately declared the winner. If there are more than 2 candidates in the primary vote and none receive 2/3 of the total vote then a final vote shall be held between the top two vote-getters. In the final vote, the President shall be decided by a simple majority vote. If there are no more than two candidates for President, then there will be no primary election before the final vote and a simple majority will elect.
ah - it's the 'more than' which has been removed isn't it? Good call.
Jenbel is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 7:10 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 15,654
FWIW, I support this motion and have already voted in favour.
B747-437B is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 8:17 am
  #4  
Flyertalk Evangelist and Moderator: Coupon Connection and Travel Products
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Milton, GA USA
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum Elite, Hyatt Discoverist, Radisson Elite
Posts: 19,040
Just to be technical... should it say "garnering 2/3rd or more"...

And.... do abstentions count?
wharvey is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 9:06 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 15,654
Originally Posted by wharvey
And.... do abstentions count?
Abstain is not an option in a vote that isn't "yes" or "no".
B747-437B is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 9:09 am
  #6  
Moderator: Hyatt Gold Passport & Star Alliance
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: London, UK
Programs: UA-1K 3MM/HY- LT Globalist/BA-GGL/GfL
Posts: 12,077
Originally Posted by wharvey
Just to be technical... should it say "garnering 2/3rd or more"...

And.... do abstentions count?
My original proposal was to go with the wording you suggest but this was opposed by enough TB members that the higher threshold would not have passed. Hence this motion which sets a lower, but consistent bar.
Markie is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 10:20 am
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DCA
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 1,653
Originally Posted by Markie
My original proposal was to go with the wording you suggest but this was opposed by enough TB members that the higher threshold would not have passed. Hence this motion which sets a lower, but consistent bar.
So with this wording, a member will only be elected in the first round if they get exactly 2/3 of the votes?

That seems strange.
DeaconFlyer is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 10:35 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: LAS
Posts: 1,279
I may be jet-lagged or missing something, but I'll comment anyway.

It seems the language is only being changed to remove the word "more" (which required the vote to EXCEED 2/3rds) to language that states the vote must be EXACTLY 2/3rds. To me, the phrasing should be crystal clear/logical that receiving 2/3rds or more of the vote is sufficient.
ScatterX is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 12:15 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 15,654
If someone achieves 2/3 + 1 vote of the total, one has also achieved 2/3 of the total. Hence the usage of the term "2/3 or more" is not necessary in my opinion. However "more than 2/3" means that 2/3 is not sufficient and 2/3 + 1 vote is required. There are different meanings at play here, hence the need for clarification.
B747-437B is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2011, 2:22 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Greener Pastures
Posts: 10,515
Originally Posted by B747-437B
FWIW, I support this motion and have already voted in favour.
same here.
bhatnasx is offline  
Old Jan 16, 2011, 3:13 pm
  #11  
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
Motion passed: Amend TalkBoard Guidelines, Winning TalkBoard President Election Thres

On 16 Jan 2011, the TalkBoard unanimously passed:

Moved by Markie and seconded by jackal:

The TalkBoard recommends that the following amendments be made to the TalkBoard Guidelines:

Section 3, paragraph ii, sub-paragraph c be replaced with the following text :

The presidential elections shall be conducted as follows: Any candidate garnering 2/3rd of the total TalkBoard vote in the primary presidential vote shall be immediately declared the winner. If there are more than 2 candidates in the primary vote and none receive 2/3rds of the total vote then a final vote shall be held between the top two vote-getters. In the final vote, the President shall be decided by a simple majority vote. If there are no more than two candidates for President, then there will be no primary election before the final vote and a simple majority will elect.
Spiff is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2011, 1:02 pm
  #12  
Original Member, Ambassador: External Miles and Points Resources
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Digital Nomad Wandering the Earth - Currently in LIMA, PERU
Posts: 58,585
Congratulations to the TalkBoard for making this bold and much-called-for substantive change. And without a single abstention!

I am certain I speak for all posters when I say that FlyerTalk will now be a better place for your efforts. ^
kokonutz is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2011, 10:25 pm
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yiron, Israel
Programs: Bates Motel Plat
Posts: 68,920
Any candidate garnering 2/3rd of the total TalkBoard vote...
Shouldn't that read "2/3rds"? Can we get another vote to amend this error?
Dovster is offline  
Old Jan 20, 2011, 7:00 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Exile
Posts: 15,654
Originally Posted by Dovster
Shouldn't that read "2/3rds"? Can we get another vote to amend this error?
I would abstain from that vote.
B747-437B is offline  
Old Jan 20, 2011, 9:45 am
  #15  
Ambassador, New England
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maineiac, USA
Programs: Amtrak, WN RR, Choice
Posts: 2,655
Originally Posted by Dovster
Shouldn't that read "2/3rds"? Can we get another vote to amend this error?
Technically, is the 'rds' even needed? I always thought "2/3" was interpreted as "two thirds".
lo2e is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.