Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Smoking charge (when no one smoked)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 29, 2015, 5:34 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: KSA
Programs: Marriott AMB, Skywards Gold
Posts: 3,737
Originally Posted by Big4Flyer
Pardon my ignorance, but does marijuana smell that strongly even before its smoked?
Oh yes. It smells the same before and after. Just take a walk around downtown SF and you can tell who's smoking what.
LovetoTravel83 is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 5:39 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Programs: Marriott LT Tit; Hyatt Explorist; Hilton CC Gold; IHG CC Plt; Hertz (MR) 5 star
Posts: 5,536
Originally Posted by Big4Flyer
Pardon my ignorance, but does marijuana smell that strongly even before its smoked?
YES. It's a very strong, distinctive smell.

Here's an article on how to control the smell if you've got a grow room: http://www.growweedeasy.com/smell
iflyjetz is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 5:48 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,860
Pot stinks, I get it. You can smell a grow house down the street, but even at the Four Points LAX - and my pot stinking room that I received. By the following morning - the smell was gone.

Another thing here;

Pot smoke doesn't bother me like tobacco smoke. Tobacco smoke seems to not only linger - but stick to substances. We've all seen tobacco stained stuff from a heavy smoker. But I have never had any experiences with marijuana users who had smoked so much their wallpaper or computer would become stained or discolored.

I have a double standard here, and I clearly see tobacco smoking as way bigger of an issue than marijuana smoking. So my answers are all biased, and tell the OP what he/she wants to hear.

I did a quick Google search of $200 smoking charge for california/starwood and found something recent from the Westin Long Beach (currently staying here) - although their story claims they never have used or even possessed marijuana;

http://www.yelp.com/biz/the-westin-l...ach-long-beach


If OP stayed at a Westin - and had a $200 smoking fee, I will say - that seems very Westin of them. I think Westin can be a little pretentious - and I have no doubt that hotels in Southern Cali have non-stop marijuana users coming through their hotel. Westin is the...."refresh this, RX that, breathe deep, etc" brand. I honestly kind of just describe Westin as a "clean hotel brand". Like nothing is special about the brand per se - other than they try and offer decent and clean hotels.

I can speak from personal experience that the Westin Long Beach would not be a ideal hotel to smoke in. Windows do not open, and bathroom ventilation is poor. You can smell your neighbors taking a crap even.

Last edited by factory81; Sep 29, 2015 at 6:15 pm
factory81 is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 6:13 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,860
Burned marijuana can in my opinion be a bit more noticeable. As in, you could smell someone exhale smoke from across a parking lot and it will carry the smell.

But if you leave a bag of marijuana in a room, it is entirely possibly to walk in and smell what seems like a room full of marijuana. Even if the bag is sealed. You would need to go as far as to bring some sort of portable vacuum sealer.

So the OP has a point about paying for privacy, and wondering if it is even permissible to store medicine in a room.

I think the OP has a strong case because in my opinion; for there to be proof of burned marijuana - you would have to be able to find ashes or something. If you found unburnt crumbs of marijuana - you don't have proof that someone smoked in the room.

If you have a smell of marijuana - it still isn't proof of smoking in a room. The smell is crazy.

Here is what I would do: If you paid with your SPG Amex - wait 45 days to make a claim and say the hotel and you were not able to come to terms with the disagreement. I doubt they keep pictures of crumbs of marijuana (for evidence) for that long of time. And I really think you will have a high chance of beating the case. Unless they can produce evidence of ashes, or burns in the carpet/etc..........what proof do they have?

The more I think about it, the more annoying it is to m;, because I think it is basically like saying - if I left a pack of cigarettes in my room - I could be charged for smoking. Because the cigarettes (or marijuana crumbs) themselves could be used by the hotel as evidence that smoking was done in the room.

If hotels have such a problem with lingering smells - they should provide air sealed containers for their guests to store their smelly items in. Everything from perfume/cologne/tobacco/medicine.

I am getting too worked up over something that doesn't even matter. But I could really see myself getting hit up with one of these charges one day. E.G. - how many people will take a ski trip to Colorado or Washington and instead of take marijuana with them to the airport - leave it in the hotel room? This scenario is setting precedent - that they could be charged for smoking in their room. Just the fact that you don't need to smoke in your room to get charged a smoking fee is what irks me.



I know for a fact that some of my own friends would bring it in to the hotel room in those states. And this story is changing my view of how I would try and handle these scenarios. I am actually hoping Starwood addresses this in some way.

I don't think it is any surprise to us; that in 2016/2018 we will see a lot of states moving to legalize the substance. Which means there will be a whole lot more people carrying this back to their hotel room.....(and many of them will not be smoking in their rooms).

Thoughts that make you go hmmm......




Originally Posted by Big4Flyer
Pardon my ignorance, but does marijuana smell that strongly even before its smoked?
factory81 is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 6:56 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Programs: Marriott LT Tit; Hyatt Explorist; Hilton CC Gold; IHG CC Plt; Hertz (MR) 5 star
Posts: 5,536
Originally Posted by factory81
But if you leave a bag of marijuana in a room, it is entirely possibly to walk in and smell what seems like a room full of marijuana. Even if the bag is sealed. You would need to go as far as to bring some sort of portable vacuum sealer.

I think the OP has a strong case because in my opinion; for there to be proof of burned marijuana - you would have to be able to find ashes or something. If you found unburnt crumbs of marijuana - you don't have proof that someone smoked in the room.

If you have a smell of marijuana - it still isn't proof of smoking in a room. The smell is crazy.

The more I think about it, the more annoying it is to m;, because I think it is basically like saying - if I left a pack of cigarettes in my room - I could be charged for smoking. Because the cigarettes (or marijuana crumbs) themselves could be used by the hotel as evidence that smoking was done in the room.

I am getting too worked up over something that doesn't even matter. But I could really see myself getting hit up with one of these charges one day. E.G. - how many people will take a ski trip to Colorado or Washington and instead of take marijuana with them to the airport - leave it in the hotel room? This scenario is setting precedent - that they could be charged for smoking in their room. Just the fact that you don't need to smoke in your room to get charged a smoking fee is what irks me.



I know for a fact that some of my own friends would bring it in to the hotel room in those states. And this story is changing my view of how I would try and handle these scenarios. I am actually hoping Starwood addresses this in some way.

I don't think it is any surprise to us; that in 2016/2018 we will see a lot of states moving to legalize the substance. Which means there will be a whole lot more people carrying this back to their hotel room.....(and many of them will not be smoking in their rooms).

Thoughts that make you go hmmm......
Take a deep breath and relax.

The issue isn't whether or not someone smoked in the OP's room; the OP is being charged for deep cleaning the room due to lingering smells.

People who bring pets into hotels are charged for deep cleaning. They aren't being charged for someone smoking in the room; they're being charged for lingering pet smells and pet hair.

You have acknowledged that marijuana has a pungent smell that lingers. I don't want to get that room after the OP and have my personal items pick up some residual marijuana odors. What you are saying is that I should either be forced to accept a room that reeks of marijuana or the hotel should eat the deep cleaning charge caused by the OP's guest bringing marijuana into the room.

To put the shoe on the other foot, I'm sure that there are some smells you find offensive. How about if the previous guest had a pet that wasn't housebroken and it urinated and defecated all over the room - and the hotel didn't deep clean the room because they weren't reimbursed for deep cleaning it? Is this acceptable to you? If so, let the front desk know from now on that you want the stinkiest room in the hotel. I, on the other hand, have gone back to the front desk to get a different room if there were strong lingering odors in the room.

I pay for a clean, odorless room. If I stunk up a room that was previously odorless, I'd expect to be charged for deep cleaning.
iflyjetz is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 7:03 pm
  #36  
Formerly known as billinaz
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Goodyear,AZ for now then FL Spacecoast
Programs: US Airways Dividend Miles, American AAdvantage, Avis Preferred, Budget Rapid Rez, Hilton Honors
Posts: 1,145
Originally Posted by Doc Savage
If you'd stop saying "the medicine" you'd avoid pissing off a lot of people.

But your overly self-righteous attitude about "the medicine" makes me question, in the back of my mind, your assertion "the medicine" was not smoked in the room.

And frankly, I'm wondering just how much you'd have to spill for the maids to find it.

Just sayin'
This.
SpaceCoastBill is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 7:40 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,860
OP said smoking charge, and was told the charge was for deep cleaning. One way or another, sucks for the OP.

News flash then to SPG customers: don't leave any crumbs behind. And keep your stash sealed!



Originally Posted by iflyjetz
Take a deep breath and relax.

The issue isn't whether or not someone smoked in the OP's room; the OP is being charged for deep cleaning the room due to lingering smells.

People who bring pets into hotels are charged for deep cleaning. They aren't being charged for someone smoking in the room; they're being charged for lingering pet smells and pet hair.

You have acknowledged that marijuana has a pungent smell that lingers. I don't want to get that room after the OP and have my personal items pick up some residual marijuana odors. What you are saying is that I should either be forced to accept a room that reeks of marijuana or the hotel should eat the deep cleaning charge caused by the OP's guest bringing marijuana into the room.

To put the shoe on the other foot, I'm sure that there are some smells you find offensive. How about if the previous guest had a pet that wasn't housebroken and it urinated and defecated all over the room - and the hotel didn't deep clean the room because they weren't reimbursed for deep cleaning it? Is this acceptable to you? If so, let the front desk know from now on that you want the stinkiest room in the hotel. I, on the other hand, have gone back to the front desk to get a different room if there were strong lingering odors in the room.

I pay for a clean, odorless room. If I stunk up a room that was previously odorless, I'd expect to be charged for deep cleaning.

Last edited by factory81; Sep 29, 2015 at 7:48 pm
factory81 is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 8:07 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 4,993
Originally Posted by LovetoTravel83
Oh yes. It smells the same before and after. Just take a walk around downtown SF and you can tell who's smoking what.
This the reason we don't go to SF anymore.
My wife is an asthmatic and MJ smoke nearly always triggers a serious attack.

Try going out to dinner at any of the nicer restaurants in SF and you will invariably find packs of hipsters smoking weed within 50 feet of the restaurant entrance. MJ smoke is much more destructive of the lungs than Tobacco (which they seem to aggressively prohibit), so why are people allowed to smoke MJ in public like that in SF?
zombietooth is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 8:42 pm
  #39  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,753
Originally Posted by Soccerdad1995
The OP will tell the cc company what happened and then the hotel will need to prove something. And the hotel will likely lose unless they can provide some evidence that the OP did in fact smoke in the room.
Not necessarily. I suggest that a lot depends on how the policy reads. If the policy says something like the charge will be imposed if the guest smokes in the room, then the hotel would need to prove that the guest smoked in the room. But if the policy says something more along the lines of the charge will be imposed if management determines that the guest smoked in the room, then the standard is different. Assuming that the policy was written by a lawyer, i assume that the latter is closer to what it says (or the lawyer needs to be replaced).


Originally Posted by factory81
But I have never had any experiences with marijuana users who had smoked so much their wallpaper or computer would become stained or discolored.
Could be due to the fact that since pot smoking has only become legal very recently, there are precious few people who have smoked as much pot for as many years as people who have smoked tobacco since they were teenagers.


Originally Posted by zombietooth
My wife is an asthmatic and MJ smoke nearly always triggers a serious attack. ... MJ smoke is much more destructive of the lungs than Tobacco ....
I wonder if any of this has to do with the fact that a substantial majority of (read nearly all) tobacco cigarettes in the U.S. have filters; but marijuana cigs don't.
Dr. HFH is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 9:39 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Programs: Marriott LT Tit; Hyatt Explorist; Hilton CC Gold; IHG CC Plt; Hertz (MR) 5 star
Posts: 5,536
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
Not necessarily. I suggest that a lot depends on how the policy reads. If the policy says something like the charge will be imposed if the guest smokes in the room, then the hotel would need to prove that the guest smoked in the room. But if the policy says something more along the lines of the charge will be imposed if management determines that the guest smoked in the room, then the standard is different. Assuming that the policy was written by a lawyer, i assume that the latter is closer to what it says (or the lawyer needs to be replaced).
The hotel's policy may not even mention smoking; it could state something along the lines of the room needing a more thorough cleaning.
iflyjetz is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 11:02 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: Marriott
Posts: 7
While "pissing off" may be strong language to some, I took it to mean "insult the intelligence of". I hate cigarettes. I hate cigarette smell. It's hard to get the odor of cigarettes out of fabric. But it's REALLY hard to get the smell of marijuana (even unsmoked) out of your nose once you've been exposed to it. It's gross. I don't consider it a legitimate medicine, but since they've turned cigarette smokers into murderers and marijuana smokers into "patients" I have no expectation of reasoned debate on the topic.
As for SPG, I was penalized $350 for parking in their hotel lot, after not parking in their lot. This error was generated by a series of hotel screw ups and it took me a year to argue it out and unravel it between totally unhelpful American Express, and totally clueless SPG. I cancelled ALL THREE of my Amex cards, and haven't done business with SPG since. FOR THE RECORD, I did get SPG to pay me back. Advice: dispute it with the card. If it doesn't work, pay the amount and immediately begin small claims proceedings.
ColePhelps is offline  
Old Sep 29, 2015, 11:35 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: hilton, usair, choice hotels, BA, delta, sheraton, radison
Posts: 1
I have had this same thing happen to me. Disputed charges with credit card company and won. I suggest you do the same and be more careful with the stash in the future.
bigmanaz is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2015, 12:31 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Tokyo
Programs: SPG LT Plat ANA Plat
Posts: 596
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
IAAL. Your statement that, "... unless Starwood can somehow prove they violated the rule by SMOKING in the room, then they didn't smoke in the room[.]" is simply not true, at least from a legal perspective. It's management's word against the OP's. In a court (which this case will never see, obviously) it would come down to the judge's assessment of credibility. Even the OP realizes this.

And there are ways to prove/disprove whether or not there was smoking in the room; but I doubt that either Starwood or the OP has any interest in incurring that cost and trouble. (Smoke consists of tiny particles which are the end products of combustion. Eventually they float down and land on surfaces, in the carpet, etc. Chemical analysis of the results of vacuuming and dusting could reveal the answer.)

Interesting perspective on the chargeback theory, -- it never occurred to me.

I would be curious as to exactly where the OP's g/f did smoke it. Perhaps it was on the balcony and some smoke inadvertently wafted back into the room? Or maybe it was somewhere else entirely but the smoke on the clothes that OP and g/f were wearing at the time carried the smoke odor into the room.

As to your questions, personally, I can't recall the last time I stayed in a hotel which didn't have smoking rooms; although I've heard that there are no-smoking hotels. Just out of curiosity, OP, which hotel was this?



Almost All if not ALL Italian hotels are all N/S. All the UK hotels I have stayed in over the last few years were all N/S. And i think this will become the norm.

Surely the point here is if the hotel can prove that the OP or his partner smoked in or allowed smoking in the room .

I dont think they can do this
BRITINJAPAN3 is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2015, 12:47 am
  #44  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,399
Originally Posted by factory81
Pot stinks, I get it. You can smell a grow house down the street, but even at the Four Points LAX - and my pot stinking room that I received. By the following morning - the smell was gone.

Another thing here;

Pot smoke doesn't bother me like tobacco smoke. Tobacco smoke seems to not only linger - but stick to substances. We've all seen tobacco stained stuff from a heavy smoker. But I have never had any experiences with marijuana users who had smoked so much their wallpaper or computer would become stained or discolored.

I have a double standard here, and I clearly see tobacco smoking as way bigger of an issue than marijuana smoking. So my answers are all biased, and tell the OP what he/she wants to hear.

I did a quick Google search of $200 smoking charge for california/starwood and found something recent from the Westin Long Beach (currently staying here) - although their story claims they never have used or even possessed marijuana;

http://www.yelp.com/biz/the-westin-l...ach-long-beach


If OP stayed at a Westin - and had a $200 smoking fee, I will say - that seems very Westin of them. I think Westin can be a little pretentious - and I have no doubt that hotels in Southern Cali have non-stop marijuana users coming through their hotel. Westin is the...."refresh this, RX that, breathe deep, etc" brand. I honestly kind of just describe Westin as a "clean hotel brand". Like nothing is special about the brand per se - other than they try and offer decent and clean hotels.

I can speak from personal experience that the Westin Long Beach would not be a ideal hotel to smoke in. Windows do not open, and bathroom ventilation is poor. You can smell your neighbors taking a crap even.
Westin is the brand that uses scent in buildings. It's supposed to be relaxing but to me it's just irritating.

More generally, in many hotels I'd like to request that my room be deep cleaned after a housekeeper uses a heavy dose of fragrance. It would be great if I could also collect $200 for every instance.....or have the hotel charge the guests and give me the money when I'm forced to share an elevator with someone returning from a trip outside to smoke.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Sep 30, 2015, 8:13 am
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 28,097
If OP feels they were truly wronged and has expended all efforts with the particular hotel to no avail then take your case to the companies executives.

Here is some contact info for Starwood properties from consumer advocate Chris Elliott.

http://elliott.org/company-contacts/starwood/
Boggie Dog is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.