Starwood Corporate : exploring options to boost value inc acquiring or being acquired
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold / OnBusiness, SPG Lifetime Plat 100, AmEx Centurion & BAPP, Superking Westin Heavenly Bed :)
Posts: 1,142
Starwood Corporate : exploring options to boost value inc acquiring or being acquired
This will be interesting to watch. I hope one of the larger groups doesn't swallow Starwood though, or it will mean an end to my Lifetime Platinum status!
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ck-in-real-m-a
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...ck-in-real-m-a
(Bloomberg) -- Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. may
need to accommodate activist shareholders with a merger or
buyout.
Starwood, which owns high-end hotel chains such as W and
Westin, has one of the worst stock-return and growth outlooks in
the industry. It’s also entering the second month of searching
for a chief executive officer as pressure builds for the $14
billion company to buy some lower-cost hotel brands to keep up
with rivals.
Activists tend to sniff around when leadership is in flux,
and there’s already speculation that one is targeting Starwood.
Analysts say the end result could be one of several deal
scenarios, such as selling to Wyndham Worldwide Corp. or
structuring a tax inversion with InterContinental Hotels Group
Plc.
<snip>
need to accommodate activist shareholders with a merger or
buyout.
Starwood, which owns high-end hotel chains such as W and
Westin, has one of the worst stock-return and growth outlooks in
the industry. It’s also entering the second month of searching
for a chief executive officer as pressure builds for the $14
billion company to buy some lower-cost hotel brands to keep up
with rivals.
Activists tend to sniff around when leadership is in flux,
and there’s already speculation that one is targeting Starwood.
Analysts say the end result could be one of several deal
scenarios, such as selling to Wyndham Worldwide Corp. or
structuring a tax inversion with InterContinental Hotels Group
Plc.
<snip>
Last edited by Oxon Flyer; Apr 30, 2015 at 7:52 am Reason: Replace full article with source link and summary, as per FT copyright rule 9
#2
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Europe/SEA
Programs: TK E+, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Diamond, IHG Platinum, Dusit Gold
Posts: 1,714
Thanks for sharing this.
#3
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: GVA
Programs: BA Silver (OW Sapphire), A3 Gold (*G), Bonvoy LTTE, HHonors Diamond, LeClubAccor Silver, UA Silver
Posts: 1,765
Uh-oh! I sense "enhancements" to SPG not too far down the line...
#4
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,324
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; en-us; LGL31L/V100 Build/KOT49I.L31L10d) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.1599.103 Mobile Safari/537.36)
Probably correct. The first one being no new promo for the middle of 2015.
Originally Posted by RafKa
Uh-oh! I sense "enhancements" to SPG not too far down the line...
#5
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,008
Shareholders, activist or not, cannot determine company strategy...this is a root problem that is affecting so many companies who make the terrible mistake of allowing Wall Street to run their businesses.
The correct approach here? Tell so-called 'activist shareholders' who are screaming for a merger to go bleep-themselves - if they don't like what Starwood is doing, then sell the damn shares and go away.
The correct approach here? Tell so-called 'activist shareholders' who are screaming for a merger to go bleep-themselves - if they don't like what Starwood is doing, then sell the damn shares and go away.
#6
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Programs: Hyatt Glob; UA 1K; BonVoyage LTT (RIP SPG); HH Dia; JX Insighter
Posts: 1,640
Shareholders, activist or not, cannot determine company strategy...this is a root problem that is affecting so many companies who make the terrible mistake of allowing Wall Street to run their businesses.
The correct approach here? Tell so-called 'activist shareholders' who are screaming for a merger to go bleep-themselves - if they don't like what Starwood is doing, then sell the damn shares and go away.
The correct approach here? Tell so-called 'activist shareholders' who are screaming for a merger to go bleep-themselves - if they don't like what Starwood is doing, then sell the damn shares and go away.
#7
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,990
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; en-us; LGL31L/V100 Build/KOT49I.L31L10d) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.1599.103 Mobile Safari/537.36)
Probably correct. The first one being no new promo for the middle of 2015.
Probably correct. The first one being no new promo for the middle of 2015.
Cheers,
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold / OnBusiness, SPG Lifetime Plat 100, AmEx Centurion & BAPP, Superking Westin Heavenly Bed :)
Posts: 1,142
Shareholders, activist or not, cannot determine company strategy...this is a root problem that is affecting so many companies who make the terrible mistake of allowing Wall Street to run their businesses.
The correct approach here? Tell so-called 'activist shareholders' who are screaming for a merger to go bleep-themselves - if they don't like what Starwood is doing, then sell the damn shares and go away.
The correct approach here? Tell so-called 'activist shareholders' who are screaming for a merger to go bleep-themselves - if they don't like what Starwood is doing, then sell the damn shares and go away.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,008
My other half and I started talking to a contact about bringing in EB Visa money to do a Starwood hotel project...but if the company is planning a merger, we're not going to invest any money into a brand that might end up suffering a radical change in the next few years. I wouldn't invest money to open a Five Guys, only to be told a year later the company is owned by Burger King now and we need to change the menu.
#10
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,860
1) While I am not as experienced in M&A as others on here, I do believe that activists have influence. How can they not? If they buy enough % of the company, or become a board member through one channel or another - they can seriously impact companies. I look at AOL/Patch for example...(for those of you who know this long battle)
2) I do think Starwood is not positioning themselves in a way for meaningful growth in the short term. They are playing a big game, with a huge bet on Asia. Rightfully so, the asian culture may identify with the Starwood brand, and if all goes as planned - maybe Starwood can become a global megabrand through its asian clientele.
3) Sources reference Starwoods lack of limited service hotels. Aloft/Four Points simply do not have the market penetration.
4) I think this situation all depends on what shareholders and mgmt. expect for growth. It seems well stated that the high end market is only growing so much, there just isn't enough wealthy people traveling all the time to squeeze. I really wish that SPG would just ink a bunch of deals with services/real estate mgmt companies to go build 130-150 Four Points and 60-80 Aloft's across the USA - in the 8-12 months. I personally think they should ramp up the Element brand even more. If SPG did a 160-220 hotel increase in the Element brand, they would get the growth they want.
2) I do think Starwood is not positioning themselves in a way for meaningful growth in the short term. They are playing a big game, with a huge bet on Asia. Rightfully so, the asian culture may identify with the Starwood brand, and if all goes as planned - maybe Starwood can become a global megabrand through its asian clientele.
3) Sources reference Starwoods lack of limited service hotels. Aloft/Four Points simply do not have the market penetration.
4) I think this situation all depends on what shareholders and mgmt. expect for growth. It seems well stated that the high end market is only growing so much, there just isn't enough wealthy people traveling all the time to squeeze. I really wish that SPG would just ink a bunch of deals with services/real estate mgmt companies to go build 130-150 Four Points and 60-80 Aloft's across the USA - in the 8-12 months. I personally think they should ramp up the Element brand even more. If SPG did a 160-220 hotel increase in the Element brand, they would get the growth they want.
#11
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Paris, France
Programs: HHonor Diamond, SPG Plat100, HGP Plat, AF Plat, *A G (A3)
Posts: 155
Over-the-top "Greed is good"
In no way are Starwood shares cheap: at 25x P/E (2015e), they are almost on a par with Hilton (27.9x), La Quinta (26.4x); and definitely better appreciated than Marriott (19.8x) and Wyndham (15.5x). Starwood's cashflow (EBITDA) is even better valued at 13.7x (2015e), vs. Hilton (13.5x), La Quinta (11.1x), Marriott (11.1x). For crying out loud, Starwood also has the highest dividend yield compared to the rest. [Thanks Goldman for the estimates]
Only trouble for Starwood: it has been too richly valued at the start, so it LAGS the spectacular share price boom in the last 12 months...
Only apparent strategic "mistake" of Starwood: not having too much debt on its balance sheet (this will probably be on the "white paper" proposal of the hedge funds). But listen: hotel occupancy at 64.7% end 2014 is already above the last cycle peak (63.5% in 2005). The last time hotel occupancy had been even higher was in 1994... Add to that, room additions in the next two years are expected to exceed the last five. Can we accuse Starwood for not taking up enough debt??
Customer loyalty used to be the litmus test for company valuation. But these days turning quick profits of short-term shareholders (=activist hedge fund) trump the value of loyal premium customer loyalty (Burn the SPG program, merge it with IHG for the lower end client base to boost short-term bottom line, to have more "growth" is executing precisely that. Remember: your Starpoints are long term investment by Starwood to ensure you come back, and pay maybe a 5-10% premium over the cheapest alternative).
Now I understand why there is no Q2 promotion from SPG - management needs to boost the short-term profit to show the financial analysts that there is "growth". Maybe they should actually publicize this in a high-profile way so that long-term SPG clients know that they are actively contributing to the survival of their brand? (BUT then isn't it pathetic that LT clients need to do that, alongside donations to the UNICEF children fund???)
Too bad that Starwood had not been bought out by Buffett during the crisis...
And I'll leave it to the American members on this Board to comment on the Tax Inversion idea.
#12
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,324
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; en-us; LGL31L/V100 Build/KOT49I.L31L10d) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Chrome/30.0.1599.103 Mobile Safari/537.36)
Warren Buffett always advocates that shareholders buy products of their investee firms. But with rampant "activist" hedge fund activities, we may soon be forced to buy stocks of companies we like, just to ensure their survival...
In no way are Starwood shares cheap: at 25x P/E (2015e), they are almost on a par with Hilton (27.9x), La Quinta (26.4x); and definitely better appreciated than Marriott (19.8x) and Wyndham (15.5x). Starwood's cashflow (EBITDA) is even better valued at 13.7x (2015e), vs. Hilton (13.5x), La Quinta (11.1x), Marriott (11.1x). For crying out loud, Starwood also has the highest dividend yield compared to the rest. [Thanks Goldman for the estimates]
Only trouble for Starwood: it has been too richly valued at the start, so it LAGS the spectacular share price boom in the last 12 months...
Only apparent strategic "mistake" of Starwood: not having too much debt on its balance sheet (this will probably be on the "white paper" proposal of the hedge funds). But listen: hotel occupancy at 64.7% end 2014 is already above the last cycle peak (63.5% in 2005). The last time hotel occupancy had been even higher was in 1994... Add to that, room additions in the next two years are expected to exceed the last five. Can we accuse Starwood for not taking up enough debt??
Customer loyalty used to be the litmus test for company valuation. But these days turning quick profits of short-term shareholders (=activist hedge fund) trump the value of loyal premium customer loyalty (Burn the SPG program, merge it with IHG for the lower end client base to boost short-term bottom line, to have more "growth" is executing precisely that. Remember: your Starpoints are long term investment by Starwood to ensure you come back, and pay maybe a 5-10% premium over the cheapest alternative).
Now I understand why there is no Q2 promotion from SPG - management needs to boost the short-term profit to show the financial analysts that there is "growth". Maybe they should actually publicize this in a high-profile way so that long-term SPG clients know that they are actively contributing to the survival of their brand? (BUT then isn't it pathetic that LT clients need to do that, alongside donations to the UNICEF children fund???)
Too bad that Starwood had not been bought out by Buffett during the crisis...
And I'll leave it to the American members on this Board to comment on the Tax Inversion idea.
Excellent post accidental_tourist. Thank you.
Originally Posted by accidental_tourist
In no way are Starwood shares cheap: at 25x P/E (2015e), they are almost on a par with Hilton (27.9x), La Quinta (26.4x); and definitely better appreciated than Marriott (19.8x) and Wyndham (15.5x). Starwood's cashflow (EBITDA) is even better valued at 13.7x (2015e), vs. Hilton (13.5x), La Quinta (11.1x), Marriott (11.1x). For crying out loud, Starwood also has the highest dividend yield compared to the rest. [Thanks Goldman for the estimates]
Only trouble for Starwood: it has been too richly valued at the start, so it LAGS the spectacular share price boom in the last 12 months...
Only apparent strategic "mistake" of Starwood: not having too much debt on its balance sheet (this will probably be on the "white paper" proposal of the hedge funds). But listen: hotel occupancy at 64.7% end 2014 is already above the last cycle peak (63.5% in 2005). The last time hotel occupancy had been even higher was in 1994... Add to that, room additions in the next two years are expected to exceed the last five. Can we accuse Starwood for not taking up enough debt??
Customer loyalty used to be the litmus test for company valuation. But these days turning quick profits of short-term shareholders (=activist hedge fund) trump the value of loyal premium customer loyalty (Burn the SPG program, merge it with IHG for the lower end client base to boost short-term bottom line, to have more "growth" is executing precisely that. Remember: your Starpoints are long term investment by Starwood to ensure you come back, and pay maybe a 5-10% premium over the cheapest alternative).
Now I understand why there is no Q2 promotion from SPG - management needs to boost the short-term profit to show the financial analysts that there is "growth". Maybe they should actually publicize this in a high-profile way so that long-term SPG clients know that they are actively contributing to the survival of their brand? (BUT then isn't it pathetic that LT clients need to do that, alongside donations to the UNICEF children fund???)
Too bad that Starwood had not been bought out by Buffett during the crisis...
And I'll leave it to the American members on this Board to comment on the Tax Inversion idea.
#13
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: CT/ Germany - Ich spreche deutsch
Programs: UA 1K, Bonvoy LTTE, HH Dia, HY Expl
Posts: 4,648
News: Starwood Hotels Is Giving Activists Reason to Check In
Instead of a large deal with IHG or Wyndham couldn't Starwood buy a limited assortment brand like La Quinta or Extended Stay America to cover their lack of properties on the lower end spectrum? Not advocating it but hasn't there also been talk that Accor wanted to rid themselves of the Motel 6 hotels brand. A deal with Carlson would also give them nice coverage on the lower end spectrum in the U.S. with Country Inn and Suites and help Carlson on the higher end in the U.S.
#14
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,860
Club Carlson has such weird market penetration due to acquisitions it seems. But it seems like a perfect match for SPG.
Talking about weird market penetration, and I think Marriott has some serious gaps in Italy and of course if you compare anyone to SPG - they look weak in China.
Talking about weird market penetration, and I think Marriott has some serious gaps in Italy and of course if you compare anyone to SPG - they look weak in China.
Instead of a large deal with IHG or Wyndham couldn't Starwood buy a limited assortment brand like La Quinta or Extended Stay America to cover their lack of properties on the lower end spectrum? Not advocating it but hasn't there also been talk that Accor wanted to rid themselves of the Motel 6 hotels brand. A deal with Carlson would also give them nice coverage on the lower end spectrum in the U.S. with Country Inn and Suites and help Carlson on the higher end in the U.S.
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,008
Instead of a large deal with IHG or Wyndham couldn't Starwood buy a limited assortment brand like La Quinta or Extended Stay America to cover their lack of properties on the lower end spectrum? Not advocating it but hasn't there also been talk that Accor wanted to rid themselves of the Motel 6 hotels brand. A deal with Carlson would also give them nice coverage on the lower end spectrum in the U.S. with Country Inn and Suites and help Carlson on the higher end in the U.S.
Frankly I don't want a low end property to own - I don't need the hassle of constant refurbishment to undo guest damage, hiring security to chase out prostitutes and drug dealers, etc etc. I want mid priced business travelers and road trippers who appreciate the features, quality and value of my property and the brand is a magnet to draw SPG members into an area that has no current SPG coverage.
Days Inn, Extended Stay America, Value Inn, etc have a place in the American hotel landscape, but not as part of the Starwood portfolio. Now I believe there are a few European-only budget chains that are low priced, well maintained, very clean and offer a decent feature set (like Motel One of Germany or the Ibis brand), but I don't think you can "upscale" a budget brand in the US market and not have the individual properties end up trashed because of our unfortunate cultural practices.