NBO-LAX: Ethiopian or Turkish?
Nov 19, 2015, 11:15 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The OC, LAX
Programs: UA, AA, QR
Posts: 47
NBO-LAX: Ethiopian or Turkish?
I am using my Mileage Plus miles to book a Business Class award from NBO to LAX. I see availability going via Addis Ababa on Ethiopian, and then travelling on Ethiopian or Turkish Airlines. Obviously the Turkish flight will have me changing planes in Istanbul.
As for seating and service, which airline has a better Business Class service? Have flown on many, but will be my first on either.
Thank you in advance.
Robbie
As for seating and service, which airline has a better Business Class service? Have flown on many, but will be my first on either.
Thank you in advance.
Robbie
Nov 19, 2015, 11:27 am
#2
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: WAS/ BOM
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 1,567
I am using my Mileage Plus miles to book a Business Class award from NBO to LAX. I see availability going via Addis Ababa on Ethiopian, and then travelling on Ethiopian or Turkish Airlines. Obviously the Turkish flight will have me changing planes in Istanbul.
As for seating and service, which airline has a better Business Class service? Have flown on many, but will be my first on either.
Thank you in advance.
Robbie
As for seating and service, which airline has a better Business Class service? Have flown on many, but will be my first on either.
Thank you in advance.
Robbie
Nov 19, 2015, 12:12 pm
#5
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: PHL
Programs: NEXUS, UA Club
Posts: 641
I haven't flown Ethiopian, but when I was booking flights and was researching both airlines, the TK product seemed superior to ET. Also TK had the benefit of lie flats vs ET (I know on TK this is route dependent but to LAX should be lie flats, I'm not entirely sure about ET). That being said, I ended up flying with TK and the service was fantastic, so I'd definitely give my vote to TK.
Nov 19, 2015, 12:29 pm
#6
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Plat, AS MVP, HH Gold, MR Gold
Posts: 1,848
TK is pretty easy choice here. They can get you all the way to LAX, and the IST lounge is great. It would be painful to get on a domestic transcon after ADD-(FCO)-IAD, and the ADD lounge is not good.
Nov 19, 2015, 12:52 pm
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,293
As others have said - TK all the way. I did J HKG-ADD-GRU this summer on ET, and then GRU-IST-KUL on TK - and there simply was no comparison. And I even got lucky and had the flat beds on ET.
Nov 19, 2015, 2:43 pm
#8
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NYS
Programs: UA 1K MM, IHG Plat Amb, HH Diamond
Posts: 311
My Uncle who flies to TLV 3 times or more a year swears by TK and the lounge in IST. He purposely takes the big layover in order to spend more time in the lounge. Lie Flats and service on TK supposedly is on par with Asian carriers.
Nov 19, 2015, 3:04 pm
#9
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,427
Nov 19, 2015, 3:15 pm
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Canada
Programs: UA*1K MM
Posts: 23,293
The only issue is the 2-3-2 seating, but yes, on par with Asian carriers.
IST can be a shtshow on the ground, but they make up for it in the air.
In any case, either ET (if flat beds) or TK will be a significant improvement over UA.
IST can be a shtshow on the ground, but they make up for it in the air.
In any case, either ET (if flat beds) or TK will be a significant improvement over UA.
Nov 19, 2015, 6:09 pm
#11
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DEN
Programs: UA *G, Accor/Sofitel Gold, InterContinental Platinum
Posts: 462
NBO-LAX: Ethiopian or Turkish?
I believe the NBO-IST leg is a 737, not lie flat. Return to NBO arrives at around 1:30am, so compare time too. However I would agree TK is great, even on a 737.
Nov 19, 2015, 6:53 pm
#12
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,427
Nov 19, 2015, 9:38 pm
#13
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Switzerland
Programs: BA Exec GGL CCR, Turkish M&S Elite, HHonors Diamond, SPG Gold, Avis First Plus
Posts: 72
NBO-LAX: Ethiopian or Turkish?
A few points here:
1. Nbo -Lax is via add and dub. From Add onwards you'll be in a 787 which is not a bad option at all.
2. TK on a 737 is hell. Also the rules at Nairobi have changed and there are no flights after midnight now as far as I know.
3. The lounge in IST is good but don't think it is as earth shattering as everyone says but it's a personal choice thing I guess.
net net is I have tried TK and just last week bought a ET ticket where I had a choice between the two. I think there new 787 business class is worth a shot.
1. Nbo -Lax is via add and dub. From Add onwards you'll be in a 787 which is not a bad option at all.
2. TK on a 737 is hell. Also the rules at Nairobi have changed and there are no flights after midnight now as far as I know.
3. The lounge in IST is good but don't think it is as earth shattering as everyone says but it's a personal choice thing I guess.
net net is I have tried TK and just last week bought a ET ticket where I had a choice between the two. I think there new 787 business class is worth a shot.
Nov 19, 2015, 11:31 pm
#15
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Marriott Life Plat, various others of little note
Posts: 2,763
Et ground services are even worse than tk, and they don't make it up in the air. The 737 would give me pause, but any non 787 service on et will be "cloud 9", which is no better.