Community
Wiki Posts
Search

L.A. Times: AS vs. WN in California

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2016, 7:29 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,973
L.A. Times: AS vs. WN in California

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...nap-story.html
Executives at Southwest Airlines like to joke that they run a California airline, based in Texas.
[...]
But there is a new suitor for California fliers.

The parent company of Alaska Airlines is rushing forward with a $2.6-billion deal to acquire Virgin America in hopes of becoming the predominant airline of the Golden State — and the entire West Coast.
rove312 is offline  
Old May 17, 2016, 8:12 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston (HOU/IAH)
Programs: WN, UA, DL, AA, Chase UR, Amex MR
Posts: 2,267
Maybe, just maybe this will give WN incentive to add Hawaii from California if AS starts making a full court press on their dominance in California.
alggag is offline  
Old May 17, 2016, 9:35 pm
  #3  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,619
“We have never fallen out of love with California,” said Andrew Watterson, Southwest's vice president of network and revenue.
Charging me $123 in summer 2016 vs. the $73 I paid in summer 2015 despite massive decreases in fuel prices, they could have fooled me.

Regardless of how they feel, I've fallen out of love with them. I consider a 68% price increase in the face of lower costs to be a betrayal of any notion of loyalty.

I hope Alaska fully engages this challenge. If they eliminate change fees as United Express did, I will give them every opportunity to win my loyalty. Rapid Rewards no longer provides a big competitive edge, nor does Evolve seating. I don't check bags but if I did I would just get the Alaska credit card. Southwest's only real edge is its lack of change fees. Matching that policy will be the gut check for Alaska.
nsx is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 1:40 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,307
It's just PR hype. While AS/VX will be a bigger competitor to WN in California, they will never be the state's largest carrier. In fact, I think UA (and maybe AA) will still be bigger than AS/VX in California. SFO is the only CA airport the two serve where AS/VX will have a greater market share. Of course there are stations like STS/FAT/MRY. But most of the AS flights into those airports are on regional aircraft.
Fanjet is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 2:28 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 2,400
Originally Posted by alggag
Maybe, just maybe this will give WN incentive to add Hawaii from California if AS starts making a full court press on their dominance in California.
Or maybe WN will start non stops to the LA area finally? Besides the ones to SAN and SNA.
tatterdema is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 7:08 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 616
I have a very strange feeling that Southwest had a plan A and plan B schedule for this rollout and will release B which ups intra California and California-XXX flying big time. We'll see.
jco613 is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 7:45 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Programs: WN A-List, AS MVP, HH Gold, FPC Premier, Hyatt Diamond, CC Gold, TR Diamond
Posts: 73
Southwest's only real edge is its lack of change fees. Matching that policy will be the gut check for Alaska.
Totally agree. Alaska already has no change fees 60+ days out, so they are half way there. And they have something SW does not have--"MY WALLET" lists all of your "unused travel funds" along with expiration dates. So much better than looking for some post-it note you made and lost way back when.

AS also beats SW on baggage claim delivery time with their under 20 minute guarantee: "If your bags are not at baggage claim within 20 minutes of your plane’s arrival at the gate, we’ll offer you a $25 discount code for use on a future Alaska Airlines flight, or 2,500 Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan™ bonus miles."

Last edited by RoadWarrior707; May 18, 2016 at 8:05 am
RoadWarrior707 is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 9:15 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: SFO
Posts: 3,878
High speed rail will be a larger challenge to WN if it materializes as advertised.
Troopers is online now  
Old May 18, 2016, 10:10 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: IHG Diamond Elite, Hilton Diamond, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 3,531
Originally Posted by Troopers
High speed rail will be a larger challenge to WN if it materializes as advertised.
No, it won't. It's now going to take a minimum of 4 hours to get from L.A. to S.F...IF it ever gets built. Hopefully, we Californians will be able to derail it completely.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ca...rticle/2591210
CalItalian is online now  
Old May 18, 2016, 10:35 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: SMF
Posts: 1,251
This will be great for flyers in the bay area and LA basin. Sadly, we're still stuck with WN from SMF unless we want to fly to SEA or PDX.
Big4Flyer is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 3:37 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,637
Originally Posted by Big4Flyer
This will be great for flyers in the bay area and LA basin. Sadly, we're still stuck with WN from SMF unless we want to fly to SEA or PDX.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/alaska...151000214.html
ucdtim17 is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 3:43 pm
  #12  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,619
Until they take the plunge to eliminate change fees intra-California, I won't be paying much attention. I think that's the ante to enter this market with a chance to win.
nsx is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 5:55 pm
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Danville, CA, USA;
Programs: UA 1MM, WN CP, Marriott LT Plat, Hilton Gold, IC Plat
Posts: 15,715
VX currently provides great competition for WN and UA with low fares (I don't find the purple-lit planes to be that special but YMMV). Not sure that AS can do much more within CA except provide a better aspirational mileage program, F upgrades, etc.

Of course, it would be great to see "shuttle" service like the old PSA v. AirCal days or UA's shuttle in the '90s. But I do not think the economics support that model anymore, putting aside the logistical issues (weather, ATC, etc.)

Originally Posted by Troopers
High speed rail will be a larger challenge to WN if it materializes as advertised.
That's decades away under the best case scenario. More likely Sacramento will kill it after Gov. Brown terms out. It was always a vanity project, a boondoggle that would cost far more than the value it would bring.

Originally Posted by alggag
Maybe, just maybe this will give WN incentive to add Hawaii from California if AS starts making a full court press on their dominance in California.
I don't know about you but no way I would fly in a WN seat for 5 hours. I can barely tolerate E+ anymore. Thankfully there are frequent fare sales from CA<-> Hawaii so we don't really need the "southwest effect"
Boraxo is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 6:01 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: home = LAX
Posts: 25,932
Originally Posted by Troopers
High speed rail will be a larger challenge to WN if it materializes as advertised.
I recently heard some teaser on SoCal's KNX1070 news radio (but didn't hear the whole story) about some new intra-California transport technology being tested out fairly soon which could trump high-speed rail. Anyone know the details?
sdsearch is offline  
Old May 18, 2016, 6:06 pm
  #15  
nsx
Moderator: Southwest Airlines, Capital One
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: California
Programs: WN Companion Pass, A-list preferred, Hyatt Globalist; United Club Lietime (sic) Member
Posts: 21,619
Originally Posted by sdsearch
I recently heard some teaser on SoCal's KNX1070 news radio (but didn't hear the whole story) about some new intra-California transport technology being tested out fairly soon which could trump high-speed rail. Anyone know the details?
Google Hyperloop. Hyperexpensive.
nsx is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.