Community
Wiki Posts
Search

'Deplane': We need to offload fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 29, 2015, 9:28 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,459
'Deplane': We need to offload fuel

This was a new one to me. I was flying the last flight of the night from STL to MDW. Everyone is in their seats and it is push time. The captain comes on and says there will be a short delay because we need to offload fuel. 10 minutes later Captain says they are still working on it. After sitting for 20-25 minutes Captain says that we all need to leave the plane, but leave all your carry-ons on the plane.

5 minutes after everyone was off, they want to start reloading. No one without a mobile boarding pass has one. They announce that we must show ID and they will cross us off the list. Several people shout that they told us to leave carry-ons on the plane and they don't have their ID's. Oh. More conferring. OK, just tell us your full name. Needless to say, it took quite a long time to get everyone back on the plane.

Amazingly, everyone got back into their original seats and there were no fights over seats.

To Southwest's credit, it appears that they held the flights of everyone who was connecting - about 4 flights.
lougord99 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 10:01 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,509
No crew was asked - or ventured - an explanation?

The captain said nothing after everyone re-boarded?

Holy hell.
LegalTender is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 10:19 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,509
If "off-loading fuel" was a contrivance to cover a security alert - which it sorta sounds like to me - the captain would look like a fool trying to uphold the bogus pretext.

No flight officer has credibility to squander.
LegalTender is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 10:32 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: RNO
Programs: AA/DL/UA
Posts: 10,774
Absurd!
Kevin AA is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 11:10 am
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,459
Originally Posted by LegalTender
If "off-loading fuel" was a contrivance to cover a security alert - which it sorta sounds like to me - the captain would look like a fool trying to uphold the bogus pretext.

No flight officer has credibility to squander.
I don't think so. As I was walking past the cockpit, I heard a radio transmission in the cockpit from what appeared to be ground personal talking about the fuel.

Originally Posted by LegalTender
No crew was asked - or ventured - an explanation?

The captain said nothing after everyone re-boarded?
Nothing was said after we reboarded.

This was a completely full plane to a very short runway, so fuel load is certainly important.
lougord99 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 11:39 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,509
Originally Posted by lougord99
This was a completely full plane to a very short runway, so fuel load is certainly important.
Roger that. So the captain referenced a "very short runway?"

Wikipedia lists 11,000 ft. and 9,000 ft. runways at STL.

An airport official estimates only 5% of flights use the 11-29 runway
LegalTender is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 11:40 am
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,459
Other way around. STL to MDW. MDW has 6,000 - 6,500 ft. runways.

Also, only 41 minutes in the air. We don't burn much off enroute.
lougord99 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 11:45 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Programs: LTP, PP
Posts: 8,698
So the million dollar question, apparently fuel offloading requires a passenger-less plan, presumably due to the risks involved? FAA rule?
joshua362 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 12:07 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Paradise
Posts: 1,617
Originally Posted by lougord99
Other way around. STL to MDW. MDW has 6,000 - 6,500 ft. runways.

Also, only 41 minutes in the air. We don't burn much off enroute.
You would think this would have been factored into the equation from the get go. It sounds like the re-fueller overfilled the plane.
Yellowjj is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 12:46 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,286
I've experienced similar clusters at least a couple times with Southwest -- offloading the whole plane then reboarding in a huge disorganized mess. Once we reboarded for the sole purpose of retrieving our carry-ons and belongings, after initially being told to leave them but then being told our flight was "moved to another plane" which actually turned out to later be cancelled (before we boarded the new plane, which to my knowledge never actually existed).

But never deplaned so they could de-fuel. Odd.
ursine1 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 1:06 pm
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by Yellowjj
You would think this would have been factored into the equation from the get go. It sounds like the re-fueller overfilled the plane.
On a micro hop like this, all it takes is a reroute for an aircraft expecting to depart and land to the west, now headed direct. If properly fueled for the original routing, would likely make the aircraft heavy on arrival.

It's far from unusual and the Captain's announcement seems to have said all that there is to be had.

Needless to say, the WN practice of collecting paper BP's makes this is a silly process later, but WN sticks to lots of silly practices which don't make much sense.
Often1 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 1:13 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Inland Empire, semi-regularly going between LAX/ONT/SNA and IND/STL
Programs: Rapid Rewards, SkyMiles, AAdvantage
Posts: 668
Originally Posted by Yellowjj
You would think this would have been factored into the equation from the get go. It sounds like the re-fueller overfilled the plane.
Lots of possibilities came to mind...perhaps the wind shifted, either changing fuel burn en-route or actually changing the distance flown (by changing which runway end would be in use, for example), perhaps there were storms they were planning on having to go around which have since dissipated...perhaps some exceptionally heavy baggage was loaded...could be many reasons.

I don't know how far in advance they plan these things (there's someone on here who might, though that might also be information he's not allowed to share), but depending on when it is there's a lot that could change between then and when things actually get under way.
BerenErchamion is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 2:52 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,028
[QUOTE=BerenErchamion;25347555
I don't know how far in advance they plan these things (there's someone on here who might, though that might also be information he's not allowed to share), but depending on when it is there's a lot that could change between then and when things actually get under way.[/QUOTE]

Actually, it was one of my flights, and I'm checking into it....
OPNLguy is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 2:54 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Peoria
Programs: Southwest, Best Western Gold, La Quinta, Dollar
Posts: 819
Originally Posted by Often1
Needless to say, the WN practice of collecting paper BP's makes this is a silly process later, but WN sticks to lots of silly practices which don't make much sense.
What do the other airlines use?
Peoriaman1 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2015, 3:30 pm
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ORD, MDW or MKE
Programs: American and Southwest. Hilton and Marriott hotels primarily.
Posts: 6,459
Originally Posted by Peoriaman1
What do the other airlines use?
They use paper boarding passes, but they give them back to you after scanning.
lougord99 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.