Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CAK Cutbacks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2015, 12:46 am
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,790
Originally Posted by alggag
UA dehubbing CLE and leaving an opportunity to back fill didn't help CAK any either.
^^^^

Yep, UA dehubbing CLE not only hurt CLE, it also hurt CAK, if not more.
airplanegod is offline  
Old May 16, 2015, 8:34 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,120
Originally Posted by buckeyefanflyer
Does anyone else think this is rather odd to add CAK-LAS when BOS,LGA,DEN, DCA and MDW did not hit the numbers. Not a good tradeoff. I do not think the flight will last a year.
I think it's to placate CAK and maybe some that flew CAK-DEN-West, but I agree it won't last. I think CAK will close. I also think there is possiblity that ATL as a focus/hub will downsize and with it CAK-ATL and several other ATL routes will disappear.

If I was a betting man, I'd bet on HOU and AUS getting a lot more domestic routes in the next two years possibly at ATL's expense, maybe even AUS over HOU where WN can be exclusive (and not have to share nonstop traffic demand with UA as with Houston, or DL as with Atlanta). This latest extension was significant for AUS.

For CLE, maybe that will be CLE-HOU and CLE-AUS being added, but I don't see WN showing significant interest in NE Ohio otherwise.
rtalk25 is offline  
Old May 16, 2015, 9:30 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Programs: AC SE100K, F9 100k, NK Gold, UA *S, Hyatt Glob, Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 5,194
I think CAK-LAS will do well--two of the flights from CAK have regularly continued on to Vegas and had many thru passengers.

Flying from CAK is amazing as I can park the car in their lot and practially read the nametags off the WN ticket counter employees. The total time it takes us to pull into airport property, get thru security and get to the Southwest gates is 5 minutes.
expert7700 is offline  
Old May 16, 2015, 9:42 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CLE
Programs: UA,WN,AA,DL, B6
Posts: 4,168
Actually AirTran flew CAK-LAS for a brief time in 2007.
buckeyefanflyer is offline  
Old May 18, 2015, 8:16 pm
  #20  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CLE
Programs: UA,WN,AA,DL, B6
Posts: 4,168
I think in light of these cutbacks the CAK Airport people should pull all their
advertisements in the CLE market A Better Place to Fly as not any reason to
drive down there. Sure parking is close and so are Rental Cars but with all the new carriers out of CLE and lower fares and the walk to the gate is not that far it; fine by me.
buckeyefanflyer is offline  
Old May 19, 2015, 5:14 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 76
Honestly, CAK is a cancer to CLE. Once UA pulled their hub, you saw competition come into CLE, and Southwest is just joining the others.

CLE is more central to the metro area than CAK. There is no reason for them to be at CAK when they can be at CLE.
awval999 is offline  
Old Jul 10, 2015, 10:46 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 5,893
I may be looking wrong, but I don't see nonstop CAK-BOS on the schedule after 10 September. This seems a bit earlier than the November date we saw for most CAK cuts.

There is very, very little mainline service from Cleveland area to Boston area — UA is regional jets, B6 is regional jets, WN is mainline, NK (!) is mainline.

Bummer to see someone leaving the market. I gotta wonder whether FL would have cut this route if the carriers had stayed separate. (I don't understand the economics there, so for all I know FL wouldn't still be solvent?.)
mherdeg is offline  
Old Jul 13, 2015, 5:30 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,120
Originally Posted by mherdeg
I may be looking wrong, but I don't see nonstop CAK-BOS on the schedule after 10 September. This seems a bit earlier than the November date we saw for most CAK cuts.

There is very, very little mainline service from Cleveland area to Boston area — UA is regional jets, B6 is regional jets, WN is mainline, NK (!) is mainline.

Bummer to see someone leaving the market. I gotta wonder whether FL would have cut this route if the carriers had stayed separate. (I don't understand the economics there, so for all I know FL wouldn't still be solvent?.)
JetBlue's CLE-BOS is fare competitive. One can buy an $87 one-way ticket after Labor Day. Since it will be used by mainly business passenger after Labor Day, there is no need for such a big plane, like an Airbus 320, and all those middle seats

NK offers the route seasonally, but I'm surprised that NK will run the CLE-BOS route all the way to early November as seasonal. It's ACY-BOS route, also seasonal, ends right at Labor Day end, although many from NJ just drive up to BOS area if flying is too expensive.

I think FL would have cut CAK-BOS route, but maybe would have stuck on CAK-LGA as that was 2x daily. There is still no low fare carrier between CLE and NYC. Although United does often offer UA specials between CLE and EWR, i.e. fly out Fri/Sat return Mon/Tuesday for $168 r/t.
rtalk25 is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2015, 1:49 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: PIT, EWR
Posts: 138
Slightly off topic: July issue of Hemispheres shows United's CAK-EWR as a new flight. (Doesn't appear on the UA schedule yet, as far as I can tell.) This indicates UA's utter abandonment of CLE, but also that it sees some value in CAK.
flyallegheny is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2015, 7:21 pm
  #25  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CLE
Programs: UA,WN,AA,DL, B6
Posts: 4,168
UA CAK-EWR in the November schedule. Not sure how this has anything to do with CLE. UA still has more flights out of CLE outside of the hubs. They seem to be hanging in despite a lot of new competition.
buckeyefanflyer is offline  
Old Nov 26, 2015, 8:53 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by flyallegheny
There are some noises about WN expanding at PIT...hard to say what the real chances are.

In any event, the UA-dehubbing at CLE is an opening for WN there, as others have mentioned above. UA also no longer has the monopoly on BOS-CLE (JetBlue and Frontier now fly), so WN's BOS-CAK has to be feeling some pressure. And a real expansion at PIT would really put the dagger in CAK.

Too bad for CAK and nearby residents. As a Pittsburgher, I'd love to see someone make a run at YNG (Youngstown, OH) which is reasonably close Pittsburgh, Akron, Canton, Cleveland, and even Erie.
I know your post about WN @ PIT was months ago but I just noticed it. I think PIT expansion is very likely but not before 2018. May be minor expansion sooner. In 2018 bonds on PIT will be paid off which will lead to lower landing fees/ gate leases. Most existing airline leases expire giving WN some choice about location. At that time WN begins delivery on 150 large capacity 737s which will lead to great increase in seats per slot at slotted and limited space airports. This will probably open up slots for LGA-PIT if WN grows PIT station to resemble BWI operation which I believe is being considered by WN management. Ground crew members at PIT have actually said to me that after 2018, they expect to have non-stops from PIT to "every airport" on the WN system. That, of course has to be an exaggeration but it certainly makes it appear that something big is under consideration. Last but not least, space at PIT is almost unlimited.

This thread was originally about CAK. Remember, WN is now focused on expansion at HOU and DAL. I will be very surprised if, no matter what happens at PIT, that WN doesn't initiate CAK-BWI and CAK-MDW. Right now WN has fewer aircraft than would be needed for all the routes they would like to be using. Watch for service at CAK come back but more in line with typical WN route patterns than what were Airtran customary route patterns.
tcroke is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.