China Airlines (CI) next ST member
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gone to Carolina in my mind
Programs: AA ExpMM, DL 2MM, IHG Spire/RA
Posts: 1,986
China Airlines (CI) next ST member
From ATWonline:
Monday January 14, 2008
China Airlines will be announced as the next full member of the SkyTeam alliance this year, a source close to the carrier told ATWOnline. Talks between CI and SkyTeam members started last autumn.
by Kurt Hofmann
Monday January 14, 2008
China Airlines will be announced as the next full member of the SkyTeam alliance this year, a source close to the carrier told ATWOnline. Talks between CI and SkyTeam members started last autumn.
by Kurt Hofmann
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Gold, Hyatt something
Posts: 33,539
Hopefully at full EQM for all their tickets. I flew them a few months ago, and thought the service was okay, but they had one of the worst cattle-like boarding lines I've ever seen.
#3
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: New Zealand
Programs: NZ , QF , MK
Posts: 1,372
I have to admit to being very surprised at this , I would have expected all the alliances to steer clear of Taiwanese carriers for fear of upsetting the PRC - it will be interesting to see what the PRC Government would think about CZ having any form of co-operation with CI , it also seems to me that even though they cover very different markets TPE and CAN are rather close together as hubs go ( yes , I realise that they are not as close as DL's JFK hub and CO's EWR hub or NW's DTW hub , CO's CLE hub and DL's CVG hub ) considering how poor Skyteams coverage of Asia is at the moment I would have thought that MH would have brought a lot more value to the alliance than the carrier of a country which brings with it major political baggage
#4
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Programs: Iberia plus plata, TAP miles&go
Posts: 183
I have to admit to being very surprised at this , I would have expected all the alliances to steer clear of Taiwanese carriers for fear of upsetting the PRC - it will be interesting to see what the PRC Government would think about CZ having any form of co-operation with CI , it also seems to me that even though they cover very different markets TPE and CAN are rather close together as hubs go ( yes , I realise that they are not as close as DL's JFK hub and CO's EWR hub or NW's DTW hub , CO's CLE hub and DL's CVG hub ) considering how poor Skyteams coverage of Asia is at the moment I would have thought that MH would have brought a lot more value to the alliance than the carrier of a country which brings with it major political baggage
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A festering pit; a pustule of a fistula set athwart the miasmic swamps of the armpit of the Gulf of Mexico - a Godforsaken wart upon a dark crevasse of the World. (IAH)
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold, BA Silver, Marriott Lifetime Plat, Hilton Gold, Accor Gold
Posts: 31,403
If true, I'd bet this bodes poorly for CO's partnership with EVA. A shame, as their Elite class (Y+) is often very reasonably priced.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,321
Do you know which specific dates for CI join entry ST? I remember CI does not join the alliance while ago either 2005 or 2006. It doesn't seem more reasonable CI will eventually join the ST Alliance. I'm ensure CI will begin negotiations with ST board members.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DFW
Programs: AA 1M
Posts: 31,474
#8
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
I have to admit to being very surprised at this , I would have expected all the alliances to steer clear of Taiwanese carriers for fear of upsetting the PRC - it will be interesting to see what the PRC Government would think about CZ having any form of co-operation with CI
#9
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC, ROC, HNL, PEN, BKK, KUL, SIN (check out http://my.flightmemory.com/kkua)
Programs: DL Diamond charter member; 2 million miler (45% from NWA, 2MM achieved 5/2018)
Posts: 682
Why would anybody invite CI to join any alliance boggles me. They've got a very shady safety record. Other than their convenient flight schedules, I am not going to sacrifice safety over ultra early bird/red eye flights across the Pacific.
It would make sense to invite MH or QR.
It would make sense to invite MH or QR.
#10
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: MA
Programs: DL DM/2MM Marriott Platinum, HH Diamond,
Posts: 8,906
Why would anybody invite CI to join any alliance boggles me. They've got a very shady safety record. Other than their convenient flight schedules, I am not going to sacrifice safety over ultra early bird/red eye flights across the Pacific.
It would make sense to invite MH or QR.
It would make sense to invite MH or QR.
Neither of this incidents were the fault of CI or its crew/maintanence. The current fleet of CI aircraft averages under 6 years old, but the 737 fire shows that even a new plane can have issues.
#12
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NRT / HND
Programs: AA EXP, NH Plat, Former UA 1K
Posts: 5,665
This is certainly welcomed by me. With my recent frequent trips to the Philippines that won't be ending anytime soon, CI can cut a huge amount of travel time for me. Their schedule via TPE is great for us going to southern points in Asia and should be welcomed by you who need to use Skyteam to get to OZ too.
Its been a few years since I've flown on CI since I couldn't earn elite miles. I don't remember the planes being very modern, but the seat pitch in Y seemed decent. Their planes are no worse than MH (at least in Y) and the prices are frequently lower than alliance carriers. Safety really hasn't been an issue for many years... I was nervous about flying them before, but not now. Hey, maybe if we're lucky they'll allow F awards for DL, NW, or CO miles.
I really want to see MH in Skyteam just for awards wholly within SEA, but at the moment this is actually much better news for me.
Its been a few years since I've flown on CI since I couldn't earn elite miles. I don't remember the planes being very modern, but the seat pitch in Y seemed decent. Their planes are no worse than MH (at least in Y) and the prices are frequently lower than alliance carriers. Safety really hasn't been an issue for many years... I was nervous about flying them before, but not now. Hey, maybe if we're lucky they'll allow F awards for DL, NW, or CO miles.
I really want to see MH in Skyteam just for awards wholly within SEA, but at the moment this is actually much better news for me.
Last edited by dvs7310; Jan 16, 2008 at 3:18 am
#13
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: 35,000 Ft above Earth
Programs: UA Prem Plat, CX MPC Silver, CI Dynasty Gold; HHonors Gold, Marriott Gold, SPG, IHG Ambassador
Posts: 684
... - it will be interesting to see what the PRC Government would think about CZ having any form of co-operation with CI , ... considering how poor Skyteams coverage of Asia is at the moment I would have thought that MH would have brought a lot more value to the alliance than the carrier of a country which brings with it major political baggage