Federal Flight Deck Officer's Gun Goes Off During Flight
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 1999
Programs: AA 1MM/Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,215
Federal Flight Deck Officer's Gun Goes Off During Flight
#4
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IAD, and sometimes OMNI/PR. Currently: not far from IAD, but home will always be SAN (not far from the "touch my junk and I'll have you arrested" Memorial TSA Check Point) even if I'm not there so much these days.
Programs: UA, CO, Calcifer Award for Mad Haiku Skillz
Posts: 5,076
Somehow this was omitted from the Observer story:
After the shot rang out, the exclamation, "D'OH!" could be heard all the way in the back of the plane.
After the shot rang out, the exclamation, "D'OH!" could be heard all the way in the back of the plane.
#5
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
there is no fam involved in this incident but rather a ffdo which is either a captain or f/o who is caryying.
and let's be thankful that the round didn't pierce the skin of the a/c or break a window in the f/d as then you gonna have explosive decompression
The firearm of a Transportation Security Administration federal flight deck officer accidentally discharged.....
#6
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: OAK
Programs: AS MVPG 100k
Posts: 3,756
That the aircraft landed safely is an indication that discharge of a firearm in flight is apparently at least somewhat less dangerous than many alarmists would have us believe.
I'd far rather have a marshall on every flight and scrap the TSA than have to have my civil liberties abrogated in the name of "security".
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Pointy End
Posts: 3,565
#8
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central California
Programs: Former UA Premex, now dirt
Posts: 6,531
The article gives no details and it would be very easy to jump to conclusions.
That said, as one who carried a firearm every day for 33 years without an accidental discharge but had to investigate more than one such occurrence, I've got to think that one of two things most likely happened:
- He was carrying the weapon with a round in the chamber, under the hammer, which he should not have.
- or - somebody was screwing around, which he should not have been doing. This includes such things as "hey, Harry, show me your piece." The only answer to which is "sorry, no."
Either way, somebody is in trouble.
That said, as one who carried a firearm every day for 33 years without an accidental discharge but had to investigate more than one such occurrence, I've got to think that one of two things most likely happened:
- He was carrying the weapon with a round in the chamber, under the hammer, which he should not have.
- or - somebody was screwing around, which he should not have been doing. This includes such things as "hey, Harry, show me your piece." The only answer to which is "sorry, no."
Either way, somebody is in trouble.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Glad the flight landed safely.
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Minor incident. Just wait, it's a matter of time until an unarmed person is killed by one of these guns or some serious damage is done to the plane or plane's equipment as a result of one of these guns going off at an inopportune moment.
Last edited by GUWonder; Mar 23, 2008 at 4:19 pm Reason: spelling
#11
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,704
The article gives no details and it would be very easy to jump to conclusions.
That said, as one who carried a firearm every day for 33 years without an accidental discharge but had to investigate more than one such occurrence, I've got to think that one of two things most likely happened:
- He was carrying the weapon with a round in the chamber, under the hammer, which he should not have.
That said, as one who carried a firearm every day for 33 years without an accidental discharge but had to investigate more than one such occurrence, I've got to think that one of two things most likely happened:
- He was carrying the weapon with a round in the chamber, under the hammer, which he should not have.
No serious force on the planet carries an unloaded weapon. An unloaded weapon is a club with moving parts.
I have an idea what happened, but will wait for some more info for the full debrief. I bet he was securing it and did so incorrectly.
Last edited by Cholula; Mar 23, 2008 at 4:00 pm Reason: Merging multiple successive posts
#12
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
so what does occur if say at 30,000 ft, the bullet goes thru one of the windows in the f/d and then the window itself is so badly damaged that it (for lack of a better term) falls apart. maybe i'm using the wrong term but wouldn't that be cause for the cabin to lose pressure?
#13
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,952
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
so what does occur if say at 30,000 ft, the bullet goes thru one of the windows in the f/d and then the window itself is so badly damaged that it (for lack of a better term) falls apart. maybe i'm using the wrong term but wouldn't that be cause for the cabin to lose pressure?
Just my two cents.