Today's terminal dump brought to you by the letters S, T and L!
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In the home of the "brave"?
Programs: Whatever will get me out of Y and into C or F!
Posts: 3,748
Today's terminal dump brought to you by the letters S, T and L!
When airport police and TSA security officers arrived a few minutes later, the individual and the bag were gone. Mason said the item appeared to be a double-barreled derringer handgun.
After security officers were unable to detain the person, the concourse was evacuated and passengers on five planes waiting to take off were unloaded and screened again. The entire process took about 1.5 hours.
An Air Canada Jazz flight that had already taken off following the breach was diverted to Detroit Metro Airport.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/news_articl...storyid=112091
After security officers were unable to detain the person, the concourse was evacuated and passengers on five planes waiting to take off were unloaded and screened again. The entire process took about 1.5 hours.
An Air Canada Jazz flight that had already taken off following the breach was diverted to Detroit Metro Airport.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/news_articl...storyid=112091
#2
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: RTP
Programs: AA(EXP), BA, Hilton, Starwood
Posts: 1,250
STL is a crappy airport (I hate only JFK and KC worse), but why couldn't they detain the guy?
Derringers sound funny, but they come in calibers up to .41mag to my certain knowledge (not that I'd shoot one of those!) so it's not something to take casually.
OTOH, only two shots per the description, and beyond 10 feet more random than targeted dangerous. Good in a cockpit, prolly.
Derringers sound funny, but they come in calibers up to .41mag to my certain knowledge (not that I'd shoot one of those!) so it's not something to take casually.
OTOH, only two shots per the description, and beyond 10 feet more random than targeted dangerous. Good in a cockpit, prolly.
#3
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 576
#4
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Programs: UA 1.5 Million Mile flyer, Hilton Diamond, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz 5* and PC since 1985
Posts: 5,611
The TSA guys were smart enough to let him go at least. I would have done the same, no one pays you to get hurt.
#5
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ORD
Programs: CO PLT, HH DIA
Posts: 1,461
Lambert is just a friggin' dump from one end to the other. I have enver seen as much cracked, crumbling concrete with rusted rebar sticking out and rust stains running down from it than I have there. The TSA is just short of the gestapo there, the employees are unspeakably rude about 50% of the time and the Panda Express needs a good cleaning. Then they blew through how many millions of dollars for a new runway at an underused airport and how many people lost their homes? I don't think that many lost hteir homes in DIck Daley's union workfare program known as "O'Hare Expansion".
--PP
#7
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
i still don't get it and probably never will.....
suspicous and/or prohibited item in a bag legit or otheriwse....
how in god's name does the tsa:
a) let this bag out of their sight
b) let the pax out of their sight
c) let the pax and the bag disappear
morons-just absolute F*ng morons
suspicous and/or prohibited item in a bag legit or otheriwse....
how in god's name does the tsa:
a) let this bag out of their sight
b) let the pax out of their sight
c) let the pax and the bag disappear
morons-just absolute F*ng morons
#8
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 355
i still don't get it and probably never will.....
suspicous and/or prohibited item in a bag legit or otheriwse....
how in god's name does the tsa:
a) let this bag out of their sight
b) let the pax out of their sight
c) let the pax and the bag disappear
morons-just absolute F*ng morons
suspicous and/or prohibited item in a bag legit or otheriwse....
how in god's name does the tsa:
a) let this bag out of their sight
b) let the pax out of their sight
c) let the pax and the bag disappear
morons-just absolute F*ng morons
Just one more example of the current cynical approach to air transport security ...
1. We really can't secure the system
2. We really can't admit that to the public for fear of political fall-out
3. We need to do something visible so it will look like SOMETHING is being done
4. We can use this as an opportunity for a patronage hiring program, since it really doesn't matter who we have trying to perform an essentially futile function.
5. We might as well take the opportunity to toss a few contracts to our friends along the way.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SNA
Programs: UA Million Mile Nobody, Marriott Platinum Elite, SPG Gold
Posts: 25,228
i still don't get it and probably never will.....
suspicous and/or prohibited item in a bag legit or otheriwse....
how in god's name does the tsa:
a) let this bag out of their sight
b) let the pax out of their sight
c) let the pax and the bag disappear
morons-just absolute F*ng morons
suspicous and/or prohibited item in a bag legit or otheriwse....
how in god's name does the tsa:
a) let this bag out of their sight
b) let the pax out of their sight
c) let the pax and the bag disappear
morons-just absolute F*ng morons
When did they see this gun? If on the x-ray machine, the bag is still in the machine when it is seen on the screen. The belt is stopped, and the person can't get the bag.
If it was in a hand search, why does the agent simply not just call out "GUN" and every cop in the area would drop their donut and immediately draw down on the guy.
It completely amazes me how this could possibly happen over and over.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
So why does the news story end with 'they dumped the terminal to rescreen all the passengers...'?
How about the appropriate ending - '...after rescreening every single person and bag, they discovered there really was no gun'.
How about the appropriate ending - '...after rescreening every single person and bag, they discovered there really was no gun'.
#11
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 355
But you might as well hard code those last 2 points onto the bottom of every terminal dump story.
#14
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
No, no, that's not the Party Line. If an editor ever had the cajones to write an accurate headline - Incompetent Screeners Cause Terminal Evacuation - the men in black would be round quicker than you can say "Michael Chertoff".