Oh, dear, someone's in the jump seat
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: AUS
Programs: AA Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 170
Oh, dear, someone's in the jump seat
While I'm visiting the KLM board I thought I'd ask another question.
On my flight from AMS to BKK I was seated in an exit row - 9c on the 747. Luck me, I had an exit row. Not so lucky though as 2 people - not working FAs - were seated in the jump seats facing me and sat there for the entire flight. Is this customary on KLM? It was reminiscent of flying on a southwest airlines flight.
On my flight from AMS to BKK I was seated in an exit row - 9c on the 747. Luck me, I had an exit row. Not so lucky though as 2 people - not working FAs - were seated in the jump seats facing me and sat there for the entire flight. Is this customary on KLM? It was reminiscent of flying on a southwest airlines flight.
#3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Programs: Flying Blue, BMI Diamond Club, Emirates Skywards
Posts: 15
Had the same experience last time I flew from BKK to AMS, when my wife and I were in 9b and c. One of jump-seaters was stretched out so far that there was no room at all. We assumed it was our punishment for being upgraded to the upper deck on the way out to BKK.
#4
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Netherlands
Programs: FB Platinum, M&M, BA Executive Club, Sofitel Plat, Priority Club, Starwood Preferred Guest
Posts: 1,447
I cannot imagine such a jump seat is comfortable for a twelve hour flight!
Too bad they invaded YOUR legroom space.
Too bad they invaded YOUR legroom space.
#6
Suspended
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Home for the terminally bewildered.
Posts: 1,621
I very much doubt a paying passenger would be allowed to sit in a spare crew seat. It is likely the passenger was either an off-duty crew member flying stand-by or another travel industry professional on a stand-by ticket.
Either way, I think forthflyer has every right to complain if his leg room is being invaded.
If the crew seat passenger was a proper fare paying passenger then more fool them for accepting those circumstances.
Either way, I think forthflyer has every right to complain if his leg room is being invaded.
If the crew seat passenger was a proper fare paying passenger then more fool them for accepting those circumstances.
#7
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Netherlands
Programs: FB Platinum, M&M, BA Executive Club, Sofitel Plat, Priority Club, Starwood Preferred Guest
Posts: 1,447
What a selfish thought!!
Especially on daylight flights I've seen many passengers use that space to do some stretching, take a walk etc.
Another question is however, once KL starts charging extra for "superior" seats, then perhaps the situation changes.
#8
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,776
I've had jumpseaters across from me several times on the BKK route. It's a very popular leisure desination and apparently also so for the KL and other industry employees.
Remember one time, a woman only sat in jumpseat for take-off and landing, in between she disappeared off to the galley or crew rest area or something. I was of course very happy with that, I don't enjoy having someone across from me looking at me for 12 hours.
I guess WBC was booked solid
Remember one time, a woman only sat in jumpseat for take-off and landing, in between she disappeared off to the galley or crew rest area or something. I was of course very happy with that, I don't enjoy having someone across from me looking at me for 12 hours.
I guess WBC was booked solid
#9
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,527
For flights departing Schiphol there are numerous ways for non rev employee travellers to ensure a place on the plane, including leaving paying passengers behind. When returning to Schiphol, however, this can be more difficult. A real problem for the steward on vacation with girl and or boy friend who must get back to make their next working flight. It is not uncommon for staff or family of staff to have to sit out an entire trip without their own seat - in a jump seat, if they want to get back at all.
Certainly not comfortable for the poor person forced to travel this way and also disconcerting for the paying passengers who are seated opposite the roaming ´campers´.
Certainly not comfortable for the poor person forced to travel this way and also disconcerting for the paying passengers who are seated opposite the roaming ´campers´.
#10
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: FlyingBlue
Posts: 46
BKK, the Antilles. PBM are routes that you'll frequently see non-rev pax using the jump-seat. KL will never accept a commercial passenger on those seats. And also never leave them behind to take a non-revver, as someone suggests in a earlier post.
On the B747Combi the crewseat behind row 45 is very popular. It has legroom and is quite comfortable. The small folding-down seats in front of row 9 and I believe 22 are a different story. The non-revevrs would also prefer to have a regular seat and not to be bothering other passengers but sometimes it's the only way out/home. I know for a fact that KL714(PBM) on January 2nd had 6 open seats and 144 staff listed...
The best way for a non-revver to go is still the cockpit jumpseat IMHO :-:
On the B747Combi the crewseat behind row 45 is very popular. It has legroom and is quite comfortable. The small folding-down seats in front of row 9 and I believe 22 are a different story. The non-revevrs would also prefer to have a regular seat and not to be bothering other passengers but sometimes it's the only way out/home. I know for a fact that KL714(PBM) on January 2nd had 6 open seats and 144 staff listed...
The best way for a non-revver to go is still the cockpit jumpseat IMHO :-:
#11
Suspended
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Taiwan(Taichung) and UK
Programs: ANA PLAT,CI GOLD,LH SEN,Hyatt Gold.
Posts: 3,165
I very much doubt a paying passenger would be allowed to sit in a spare crew seat. It is likely the passenger was either an off-duty crew member flying stand-by or another travel industry professional on a stand-by ticket.
Either way, I think forthflyer has every right to complain if his leg room is being invaded.
If the crew seat passenger was a proper fare paying passenger then more fool them for accepting those circumstances.
Either way, I think forthflyer has every right to complain if his leg room is being invaded.
If the crew seat passenger was a proper fare paying passenger then more fool them for accepting those circumstances.
Dont you believe it, I have seen many paying passengers sat in jump seat on BKK AMS route and they are not crew or family or friends they were paying passengers. You dont honestly think KLM would allow anyone related to the crew or employees would be put in a jump seat, thats what they have biz class for
#12
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,527
And yes, KLM does leave paying passengers behind to get staff or family home. Orangefly is correct that the chances of this happening in the Antilles (e.g. Curacao ) are higher. How standby lists clear there is a fascinating subject over which is better not to ask too many questions.
Steve is also right that a jump seat is the absolute last resort after exhausting all possibilities starting with business class.
IMHO KLM would be well advised in future to severely curtail staff travelling priveleges due to the abuses and related negative impact on paying passengers.
If non rev tickets were limited to 1-2 per year (with blackout periods to elimimate situations of 144 listed non rev at the holidays) and
no one but members of crew were allowed in the crew bus,
many of the problems with abuse would be reduced.
#13
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 9,122
This happened to me on BKK-AMS in C class as well. I made a fuss and they offloaded the passenger - or maybe moved him to a y jumpseat (the passanger seemed to know the crew and looked like a KL manager - jacket/tie and all).
#14
Suspended
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Taiwan(Taichung) and UK
Programs: ANA PLAT,CI GOLD,LH SEN,Hyatt Gold.
Posts: 3,165
Been there done that and got the T shirt and still to this day enjoy bringing people over to China Airlines on the same route and listening to them after their first flight when they tell me they did not realise how bad KLm really was and what a pleasure travel can be when you get an airline who knows how treat all passengers
#15
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Netherlands
Programs: FB Platinum, M&M, BA Executive Club, Sofitel Plat, Priority Club, Starwood Preferred Guest
Posts: 1,447
BKK, the Antilles. PBM are routes that you'll frequently see non-rev pax using the jump-seat. KL will never accept a commercial passenger on those seats. And also never leave them behind to take a non-revver, as someone suggests in a earlier post.
On the B747Combi the crewseat behind row 45 is very popular. It has legroom and is quite comfortable. The small folding-down seats in front of row 9 and I believe 22 are a different story. The non-revevrs would also prefer to have a regular seat and not to be bothering other passengers but sometimes it's the only way out/home. I know for a fact that KL714(PBM) on January 2nd had 6 open seats and 144 staff listed...
The best way for a non-revver to go is still the cockpit jumpseat IMHO :-:
On the B747Combi the crewseat behind row 45 is very popular. It has legroom and is quite comfortable. The small folding-down seats in front of row 9 and I believe 22 are a different story. The non-revevrs would also prefer to have a regular seat and not to be bothering other passengers but sometimes it's the only way out/home. I know for a fact that KL714(PBM) on January 2nd had 6 open seats and 144 staff listed...
The best way for a non-revver to go is still the cockpit jumpseat IMHO :-:
Well judging by your answers you've finally revealed yourself as KLM staff?