New immigration policies: Japan to fingerprint and photograph visitors (merged)
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Thanks for the Memories !!!
Posts: 10,657
New immigration policies: Japan to fingerprint and photograph visitors (merged)
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-b...0060518a2.html
Looks like almost all "foreigners"will fall under this dubious
new law.
A few snippets from the article:
"A bill requiring fingerprinting and photographing of foreigners upon entry to Japan was passed Wednesday as a way to prevent terrorism.
With the revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Law, an estimated 6 million to 7 million foreigners entering Japan every year will be obliged to have their fingerprints and photographs taken, along with other personal identification information.
The measure exempts people under age 16, ethnic Koreans and other special permanent residents, those invited by the government and people entering Japan for diplomatic or official purposes.
Other than that, all foreigners will be targeted. For people already living here and regardless of having a permanent, work or spouse visa, all will be obliged to be fingerprinted and photographed when re-entering the country.
Teranaka pointed out that foreign spouses of Japanese will now be treated differently than their partners."
Looks like almost all "foreigners"will fall under this dubious
new law.
A few snippets from the article:
"A bill requiring fingerprinting and photographing of foreigners upon entry to Japan was passed Wednesday as a way to prevent terrorism.
With the revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Law, an estimated 6 million to 7 million foreigners entering Japan every year will be obliged to have their fingerprints and photographs taken, along with other personal identification information.
The measure exempts people under age 16, ethnic Koreans and other special permanent residents, those invited by the government and people entering Japan for diplomatic or official purposes.
Other than that, all foreigners will be targeted. For people already living here and regardless of having a permanent, work or spouse visa, all will be obliged to be fingerprinted and photographed when re-entering the country.
Teranaka pointed out that foreign spouses of Japanese will now be treated differently than their partners."
Last edited by Q Shoe Guy; May 18, 2006 at 12:28 am
#2
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 17,854
Stirring vote of confidence in the article in the quote from an anonymous Justice ministry official: "We know that many of the foreigners are neither terrorists nor criminals."
The U.S. invited this garbage when they started the U.S. program, which AFAIK has in its entire existence not found a single terrorist.
The U.S. invited this garbage when they started the U.S. program, which AFAIK has in its entire existence not found a single terrorist.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Thanks for the Memories !!!
Posts: 10,657
Originally Posted by RichardInSF
Stirring vote of confidence in the article in the quote from an anonymous Justice ministry official: "We know that many of the foreigners are neither terrorists nor criminals."
The U.S. invited this garbage when they started the U.S. program, which AFAIK has in its entire existence not found a single terrorist.
The U.S. invited this garbage when they started the U.S. program, which AFAIK has in its entire existence not found a single terrorist.
#4
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Asia/Europe
Programs: CX, OZ, MU (+AY, DL), Shangri-La, Hilton
Posts: 7,236
The US doing this is one thing, Japan with it's soured relations to China, Korea etc. another. Let's see how the neighbours react. The mutual visa regulations between Japan and Korea were just about to be loosened...
#5
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Riding the rails
Programs: Japan Forum, Skyteam Elite Plus, BW Diamond Select, HHonors Gold, NWA, DL, NH
Posts: 1,936
Let's see how the neighbours react.
My guess (and its only a guess) would be a response by those governments requiring Japanese citizens (and or other citizens) visiting/staying fingerprinted and or photographed. Sorta like how Brazil responded to the US-visit program where they required all US Citizens visiting Brazil to be photographed and fingerprinted.
If I read correctly, according to USAToday the program in Japan should be in place by November 2007.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Boston, Jo'burg, HK
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Lifetime Diamond, CX Gold, Mrs. Pickles travels for free
Posts: 13,157
Originally Posted by railroadtycoon
If I read correctly, according to USAToday the program in Japan should be in place by November 2007.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Thanks for the Memories !!!
Posts: 10,657
Originally Posted by Pickles
If they are going to make me go through the visitors line for this crap, I'm out of here by then. Their loss, idiots.
#10
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Asia/Europe
Programs: CX, OZ, MU (+AY, DL), Shangri-La, Hilton
Posts: 7,236
What buggers me most is that the people passing these laws know they are not going to have go through this humiliation when travelling. The VIP guests will still be exempted for the benefit of those dutiful American and Japanese lawmakers.
#11
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NRT/PDX
Programs: Willamette Valley Cropdusters Silver Elite, National Tent Frequent Stay program, Ed's Rent-a-tractor
Posts: 3,357
"Teranaka pointed out that foreign spouses of Japanese will now be treated differently than their partners."
Originally Posted by mosburger
What buggers me most is that the people passing these laws know they are not going to have go through this humiliation when travelling.
Last edited by DoubleJ; May 18, 2006 at 9:41 am
#12
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TYO
Programs: Tokyo Monorail Diamond-Encrusted-Platinum
Posts: 9,632
I say we go beyond basic compliance - In addition to finger prints, photographs and iris scans at the point of entry, I might also provide a urine sample to the lawmakers who approved these entry requirements.
After all, they're taking the p**s with this legislation.
After all, they're taking the p**s with this legislation.
Last edited by jib71; May 18, 2006 at 10:02 am
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 18,398
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
[url]Teranaka pointed out that foreign spouses of Japanese will now be treated differently than their partners."
Japan seems to be one of the few 'Western' countries where the most tangible terrorist threat is completely home grown. Which leads me to a personal conclusion that it would be less damning for the government if Japan were to endure another terrorist attack by Japanese nationals (perhaps partly because Japan as a whole might feel obliged to shoulder a collective sense of responsibility) than to suffer at the hands of some dirty foreigners - when fingers would point solely at the government.
Point being that foreign terrorists are a greater threat to the government than Japanese terrorists are, even if the threat to Japanese citizens by either kind of criminal is the same. Fingerprints and photos, and the enormous costs involved of harvesting and filing them, are safeguarding the careers of some ministers, not the country.
#14
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NRT/PDX
Programs: Willamette Valley Cropdusters Silver Elite, National Tent Frequent Stay program, Ed's Rent-a-tractor
Posts: 3,357
Originally Posted by LapLap
Fingerprints and photos, and the enormous costs involved of harvesting and filing them, are safeguarding the careers of some ministers, not the country.
#15
Join Date: Dec 2002
Programs: UA MM, Hilton-Dia
Posts: 1,480
Just curious - why is this a big deal? Is this an immigration-entry line congestion issue (perhaps all foreigners - permanent or not - will have to use the same line?). Or something else?
As noted, my country (USA) already does this. Is this a case of the when the shoe is on the other foot...?
As noted, my country (USA) already does this. Is this a case of the when the shoe is on the other foot...?