Sep 12, 2016, 2:11 pm
Carry-on / Overhead bins size limits for various UX aircraft
Apr 14, 2012, 2:18 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2010
Location: London
Programs: CO Platinum
Posts: 21
Carry-on / Overhead bins size limits for various UX aircraft
Having only flown recently on PMCO widebodies and the occasional 752, I would be very grateful for some advice - simply, just how stringent are the GAs these days about 45 linear inches being enforced ? I have a rollaboard of about 50 linear which has never been questioned before and which I have experimented with in a sizer (goes in with a squeeze and has the wheels just jutting out). I am considering some connectors using CR7 and EMB equipment.
Would my carryon fit in the overheads of those smaller aircraft or am I looking at a mandatory pink tag ?
Many thanks in advance for your help.
Would my carryon fit in the overheads of those smaller aircraft or am I looking at a mandatory pink tag ?
Many thanks in advance for your help.
Apr 14, 2012, 2:47 pm
#2
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: MRY
Programs: UA Platinum 2MM(BIS)
Posts: 181
All rollaboards are tagged at the gate and put into the hold when flying on CR2, CR7 and EMB120's, returned as you disembark either at the plane or in the jetway. Pretty certain that same always applies to EMB170. Overhead and under seat storage on these planes is very limited.
If you have a notebook P.C. or any other fragile items you should always remove these and take them or board with you.
Note that international (or even some U.S. domestic) travel with carry-on larger than 22 x 14 x 9 is taking a risk!
If you have a notebook P.C. or any other fragile items you should always remove these and take them or board with you.
Note that international (or even some U.S. domestic) travel with carry-on larger than 22 x 14 x 9 is taking a risk!
Apr 14, 2012, 2:47 pm
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
It won't fit.
But the gate checking process is pretty painless. Just make sure you keep your laptop and other valuables with you in your smaller carry-on, the "personal item."
But the gate checking process is pretty painless. Just make sure you keep your laptop and other valuables with you in your smaller carry-on, the "personal item."
Apr 14, 2012, 2:51 pm
#5
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,088
All rollaboards are tagged at the gate and put into the hold when flying on CR2, CR7 and EMB120's, returned as you disembark either at the plane or in the jetway. Pretty certain that same always applies to EMB170. Overhead and under seat storage on these planes is very limited.
Most GAs for the UA E-170s I've flown encourage pax to try their rollaboards in the overheads. My normal rollaboards fit in the E-170s, no problem.
My smaller rollaboard fits in the CR7 and even the CR2--the latter is the only case I've had to ask the GA and FA to let me try (they said it wouldn't fit).
Apr 14, 2012, 2:58 pm
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
On the CRJ-200. I can't even get my backpack in the overhead (I just put it under the seat in front of me).
Apr 14, 2012, 3:00 pm
#7
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,088
My larger 22" rollaboards are thicker and don't fit the CR2, though they do fit the CR7 and E-170 no problem.
Apr 14, 2012, 3:03 pm
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
My 20" Samsonite rollaboard will fit in the CR2 bins, though it does have to be crammed. I usually gate check it anyway, but when I am facing a tight connection, prefer to not have to stand around for an extra 5-7 minutes waiting for it. It goes in sideways and takes up a good portion of a bin.
My larger 22" rollaboards are thicker and don't fit the CR2, though they do fit the CR7 and E-170 no problem.
My larger 22" rollaboards are thicker and don't fit the CR2, though they do fit the CR7 and E-170 no problem.
Here is a photo of an overhead compartment on a CRJ-700. Notice how narrow the height it (compare to the size of the water bottle). Notice also how this fairly empty back pack (not mine) barely fits in:
(photo credit: Erik Seo Photography)
Apr 14, 2012, 4:06 pm
#10
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 286
I have a 20" Travelpro crew 5. It can squish to about 20"x7-8"x15" if the contents allow. When at those dimensions, it does fit in CR2, CR7, and E170 in the economy bins (versus first where applicable). I also remember some success with the smaller EMBs although, I'm less clear on which was which, and at times I've put the rollaboard under the seat. If the contents are bigger and the 8" becomes more like 11", then it will only fit on the E170. The 20" doesn't matter as they go in all the planes sideways, not lengthwise.
My data on acceptance of carrying on is from 2011. Nearly always the GA will declare at the gate that all rollaboards need to be gate checked. Usually if I say I've had it in that plane type before, or I want to try it, they'll accept that although sometimes they want me to take a tag anyway, which I do. I've never dealt with the sizer. It's about 50% whether the FA will protest versus say nothing when I show up to board the plane. Polite discussion usually works. I also find they are more flexible if you are in First, where that applies.
Generally, they have to know it will fit, especially as they also let crews on with similar bags - you will often see crew bags in those overheads prior to boarding. However, I'm guessing they don't want the word out about some bags fitting, because then most people start acting like "well MY bag will fit" and many bags don't. Easier just to tell everyone nothing fits. Once with a long walk and a minimum connection, I had an FA tell me it wouldn't fit and from the tone I knew this was not going to be good to discuss, and in a travel daze kind of way just put it right in, and then, "Oh, what? Oh, I guess it does." I do not recommend that approach if you want friendly FA service.
Generally, I still gate check on RJs other than E170, rather than deal with it, unless I have a bad connection situation.
My data on acceptance of carrying on is from 2011. Nearly always the GA will declare at the gate that all rollaboards need to be gate checked. Usually if I say I've had it in that plane type before, or I want to try it, they'll accept that although sometimes they want me to take a tag anyway, which I do. I've never dealt with the sizer. It's about 50% whether the FA will protest versus say nothing when I show up to board the plane. Polite discussion usually works. I also find they are more flexible if you are in First, where that applies.
Generally, they have to know it will fit, especially as they also let crews on with similar bags - you will often see crew bags in those overheads prior to boarding. However, I'm guessing they don't want the word out about some bags fitting, because then most people start acting like "well MY bag will fit" and many bags don't. Easier just to tell everyone nothing fits. Once with a long walk and a minimum connection, I had an FA tell me it wouldn't fit and from the tone I knew this was not going to be good to discuss, and in a travel daze kind of way just put it right in, and then, "Oh, what? Oh, I guess it does." I do not recommend that approach if you want friendly FA service.
Generally, I still gate check on RJs other than E170, rather than deal with it, unless I have a bad connection situation.
Apr 14, 2012, 4:37 pm
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
I have a 20" Travelpro crew 5. It can squish to about 20"x7-8"x15" if the contents allow. When at those dimensions, it does fit in CR2, CR7, and E170 in the economy bins (versus first where applicable). I also remember some success with the smaller EMBs although, I'm less clear on which was which, and at times I've put the rollaboard under the seat. If the contents are bigger and the 8" becomes more like 11", then it will only fit on the E170. The 20" doesn't matter as they go in all the planes sideways, not lengthwise.
My data on acceptance of carrying on is from 2011. Nearly always the GA will declare at the gate that all rollaboards need to be gate checked. Usually if I say I've had it in that plane type before, or I want to try it, they'll accept that although sometimes they want me to take a tag anyway, which I do. I've never dealt with the sizer. It's about 50% whether the FA will protest versus say nothing when I show up to board the plane. Polite discussion usually works. I also find they are more flexible if you are in First, where that applies.
Generally, they have to know it will fit, especially as they also let crews on with similar bags - you will often see crew bags in those overheads prior to boarding. However, I'm guessing they don't want the word out about some bags fitting, because then most people start acting like "well MY bag will fit" and many bags don't. Easier just to tell everyone nothing fits. Once with a long walk and a minimum connection, I had an FA tell me it wouldn't fit and from the tone I knew this was not going to be good to discuss, and in a travel daze kind of way just put it right in, and then, "Oh, what? Oh, I guess it does." I do not recommend that approach if you want friendly FA service.
Generally, I still gate check on RJs other than E170, rather than deal with it, unless I have a bad connection situation.
My data on acceptance of carrying on is from 2011. Nearly always the GA will declare at the gate that all rollaboards need to be gate checked. Usually if I say I've had it in that plane type before, or I want to try it, they'll accept that although sometimes they want me to take a tag anyway, which I do. I've never dealt with the sizer. It's about 50% whether the FA will protest versus say nothing when I show up to board the plane. Polite discussion usually works. I also find they are more flexible if you are in First, where that applies.
Generally, they have to know it will fit, especially as they also let crews on with similar bags - you will often see crew bags in those overheads prior to boarding. However, I'm guessing they don't want the word out about some bags fitting, because then most people start acting like "well MY bag will fit" and many bags don't. Easier just to tell everyone nothing fits. Once with a long walk and a minimum connection, I had an FA tell me it wouldn't fit and from the tone I knew this was not going to be good to discuss, and in a travel daze kind of way just put it right in, and then, "Oh, what? Oh, I guess it does." I do not recommend that approach if you want friendly FA service.
Generally, I still gate check on RJs other than E170, rather than deal with it, unless I have a bad connection situation.
Apr 14, 2012, 4:56 pm
#12
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN/YYZ/YKF
Programs: COdbaUA 1K MM, AA EXP, Bonbon Gold, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, NEXUS and GE
Posts: 5,837
Lots of discussion of this kind of topic in Travel Products. I have only gate checked once - because of a moronic US ramper who insisted - when flying an RJ since dumping wheels and switching to the Red Oxx Sky Train and Air Boss
The E170 almost never requires a gate check. If it does, its because the bins are full, not because legal carry-ons don't fit.
ERJ145 is a different story.
All rollaboards are tagged at the gate and put into the hold when flying on CR2, CR7 and EMB120's, returned as you disembark either at the plane or in the jetway. Pretty certain that same always applies to EMB170. Overhead and under seat storage on these planes is very limited.
If you have a notebook P.C. or any other fragile items you should always remove these and take them or board with you.
Note that international (or even some U.S. domestic) travel with carry-on larger than 22 x 14 x 9 is taking a risk!
If you have a notebook P.C. or any other fragile items you should always remove these and take them or board with you.
Note that international (or even some U.S. domestic) travel with carry-on larger than 22 x 14 x 9 is taking a risk!
ERJ145 is a different story.
Apr 14, 2012, 5:01 pm
#13
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA, USA
Programs: UA: 1K, HH: Diamond
Posts: 1,330
That's interesting, because it seems to be the same in two dimensions as my Tumi that does. Were you meaning wheels out or sideways? (I hate sideways bags, but I also have stuff I won't gate check, so...)
Apr 14, 2012, 5:06 pm
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Programs: DL SM Plat, B6 TrueBlue, UA MP, AAdvantage
Posts: 10,008
I also have stuff I won't gate check, but I always put that in my back pack which I keep on the plane.
In a way, I like gate check. It's pretty painless, and only adds a few minutes to my flight upon arrival.
Apr 14, 2012, 5:08 pm
#15
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Programs: AA EXP(4mm), DL Gold, UA Gold (1mm), HH Diamond, Bonvoy Amb(l/t Titanium). Former EA/PA elite
Posts: 993
I agree. My Tumi fits fine (I dont overstuff) Was actively encouraged by one gate agent to carry it on. However I had another gate agent insist I check it even though I knew it would fit sideways.
