Oneworld Wiki Master Thread
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SFO
Programs: AA EXP, UA Premier
Posts: 280
Oneworld Wiki Master Thread
Hello Everyone - Over the past 4 months, I've spent some time working on the AA wiki and now I'd like to get things started for the oneworld wiki. For those of you who haven't seen the AA wiki, here is the main link:
http://www.flyertalk.com/wiki/index....rican_Airlines
I hope that this type of wiki would be useful for the collection of oneworld wisdom. Right now, I just have a stub for oneworld and there are 2 very basic articles:
http://www.flyertalk.com/wiki/index....egory:Oneworld
If anyone has any ideas to share or would like to get started posting article, feel free.
Just a couple of key points:
1. Append (OW) to the end of every article name - this will prevent naming collisions with other wiki articles.
2. Always add [[Category:Oneworld]] to the end of the article. If you think that its very relevant, feel free to add additional categories like [[Category:American Airlines]] or [[Category:British Airways]]. This will allow the article to appear on multiple lists.
http://www.flyertalk.com/wiki/index....rican_Airlines
I hope that this type of wiki would be useful for the collection of oneworld wisdom. Right now, I just have a stub for oneworld and there are 2 very basic articles:
http://www.flyertalk.com/wiki/index....egory:Oneworld
If anyone has any ideas to share or would like to get started posting article, feel free.
Just a couple of key points:
1. Append (OW) to the end of every article name - this will prevent naming collisions with other wiki articles.
2. Always add [[Category:Oneworld]] to the end of the article. If you think that its very relevant, feel free to add additional categories like [[Category:American Airlines]] or [[Category:British Airways]]. This will allow the article to appear on multiple lists.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madrid, Spain & Santiago, Chile
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 3,181
Is there really a need for this? I like the all-in-one-shop apporach we have here, and the two sticky threads are pretty goood as they are; if something is missing from one of them, particularly the FAQ, why not just add to it?
#3
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
The other huge advantage of the wiki is the ability to embed tables, images and other "nicer" formatting - FT threads are quite restrictive in that respect.
I've been working on the BA wiki...no doubt if/when time permits, I'll be tackling some of the stuff here too.
Last edited by SLF; Feb 2, 2007 at 12:20 am Reason: add "Some of" per Austinrunner's post below
#5
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Programs: QP Life, AA Nothing, QF Bronze
Posts: 946
I agree that Wikis are a great enhancement. Threads, including stickies, will remain as the main focus here, particularly for experienced Frequent Flyers. The Wikis though will provide a much better entry point for those new to frequent flying in general and FT in particular.
Take for example the AA Plat Challenge. Someone who reads mention of the challenge could:
1. Read the 100+ page sticky. Lots of information in there is no longer relevant, the information is all over the place, and it's really, really long.
2. Post a new thread asking about it. This leads to "do a search", "read the sticky", and similar remarks, but very little useful information.
3. Read the Wiki - it's kept (fairly) up to date and provides all the required information in one place and in a well-structured manner.
Well done to RatherBeSailing for taking the initiative.
Take for example the AA Plat Challenge. Someone who reads mention of the challenge could:
1. Read the 100+ page sticky. Lots of information in there is no longer relevant, the information is all over the place, and it's really, really long.
2. Post a new thread asking about it. This leads to "do a search", "read the sticky", and similar remarks, but very little useful information.
3. Read the Wiki - it's kept (fairly) up to date and provides all the required information in one place and in a well-structured manner.
Well done to RatherBeSailing for taking the initiative.
#6
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Programs: QP Life, AA Nothing, QF Bronze
Posts: 946
You are to be commended for doing so. But that's part of the problem - it requires the OP of the sticky to be vigilant in keeping it up to date (and not all "sticky OPs" are as on the ball as you are). With a Wiki anyone can make the required changes.
#7
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
The reason I've not noticed you updating it is that you have made it quite clear (quotes below) that the purpose of the thread is solely for the benefit of AAdvantage members, and that solely you should be able to update it. Since I discovered that, I haven't looked at the thread again because I don't collect AA miles
I would strenuously object to anyone but me modifying the first post of that thread. And I think you're seriously underestimating the amount of work that would be necessary to ensure that the rules for just one other oneworld airline are presented fully and accurately, unless that person already has a complete and official copy of all the rules for that airline. I doubt that's the case.
If the thread was never intended to apply to non-AA miles then why is it in the OW forum which is frequented by lots of people who don't have AA miles?
Last edited by SLF; Feb 2, 2007 at 12:36 am
#9
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
To give an example of formatting, compare an FT-post to the equivalent wiki page. Note that the latter has been expanded to reflect the addition of JL, MA & RJ - but I don't have the details at present. Luckily, whoever does have some/all of the details is able to go in there & edit them, without needing to worry about setting up the table.
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
I've never been clear why that thread is here anyway rather than in the AA forum. Are we going to end up with 9 other stickies here, "oneworld awards using British Airways miles", "oneworld awards using Asia miles", "oneworld awards using Qantas miles" etc. etc. If I want to spend AA miles on a Hilton stay, should I look for a sticky in the Hilton forum telling me how to do this? Why do any of the other OW partner members find having the AA sticky here useful? Why isn't it in the AA forum, like other AAdvantage items? Where does the "how to spend AA miles on partner airlines sticky" go - in every other partner airline forum?
If the thread was never intended to apply to non-AA miles then why is it in the OW forum which is frequented by lots of people who don't have AA miles?
If the thread was never intended to apply to non-AA miles then why is it in the OW forum which is frequented by lots of people who don't have AA miles?
#11
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,861
I don't know how much experience you have with Wikis, but the problem is that anyone can change anything at any time, which requires constant vigilance to ensure that erroneous or unreliable information is not added or included (intentionally or unintentionally).
#12
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Programs: Various
Posts: 3,087
Or instead of constant vigilance, making use of the Watch feature? If it occurs, any damage can be very easily undone.
#13
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canberra, ACT, Australia
Programs: QP Life, AA Nothing, QF Bronze
Posts: 946
It is true that Wikis have issues relating to intentional and unintentional misinformation appearing. I feel that this is more than offset by the self-correcting nature of having a large audience all of whom can make changes. As long as the rogue element is a small percentage of users (as I believe it is on FT), Wikis are a significant asset. Clearly that's just my opinion, and as always YMMV.
I also believe that there is still a place for stickies, and that the Wikis provide an additional tool, not a replacement one.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Melbourne
Programs: ►QFWP/LTG►VA WP►HyattExpl.►HiltonGold►ALL Silver
Posts: 21,991
As far as Austinrunner's sticky exiting here in this forum goes, I posted my thoughts on that in the thread referred to; suffice to say it does not worry me.
As for the idea of a oneWORLD wiki, I have no problem. Any reference with accurate information can be useful.
As for the idea of a oneWORLD wiki, I have no problem. Any reference with accurate information can be useful.
Last edited by serfty; Feb 4, 2007 at 6:49 pm Reason: oops ..
#15
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CPT
Programs: BA BD SA
Posts: 4,467
As far as Austinrunner's sticky exiting here in this forum goes, I posted my thoughts on that in the thread referred to; suffice to say it does not worry me.
As for the idea of a oneWORLD wiki, I have no problem. Any reference with accurate information can be useful.
As for the idea of a oneWORLD wiki, I have no problem. Any reference with accurate information can be useful.
I too have ignored the sticky as AA is not of interest to me at the moment. I can see some merit to it but then that argument extends to similar stickies for the other airlines as mentioned by SLF. But examined logically it only has value to folks collecting AA miles; ergo, it belongs in the AA forum.
Why argue about the wiki? If someone is prepared to do the groundwork it's an additional source of information. If it becomes hopelessly corrupted it will fall into disuse and die. Thanks RatherBeSailing for getting it going.
Last edited by Cheetah_SA; Feb 3, 2007 at 1:54 am