Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > San Francisco
Reload this Page >

Small Plane Crash at SJC

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Small Plane Crash at SJC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2015, 12:12 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: San Jose, Ca
Programs: WN A-List Preffered / Companion pass, UA Gold, Hilton Dia, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3
Small Plane Crash at SJC

A small twin engine turboprop has one wing in the dirt at SJC. No fire, but lots of activity. Occurred around 10:45 this morning.


Long time lurker, but first time posting, seemed like a good one to start with. Can anyone tell me how to add a photo?
djurewicz is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2015, 2:14 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Central California
Programs: Former UA Premex, now dirt
Posts: 6,531
Originally Posted by djurewicz
A small twin engine turboprop has one wing in the dirt at SJC. No fire, but lots of activity. Occurred around 10:45 this morning.


Long time lurker, but first time posting, seemed like a good one to start with. Can anyone tell me how to add a photo?
Welcome to Flyertalk.

For attaching photos, specific instructions are found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/trave...phy-forum.html
abmj-jr is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2015, 7:29 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: San Jose, Ca
Programs: WN A-List Preffered / Companion pass, UA Gold, Hilton Dia, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3
http://www.mercurynews.com/bay-area-...planes-landing

Here is the link from the mercury news. It looks like the landing gear malfunctioned. There picture is much better than mine, but there is no way I can forget seeing that happen!
djurewicz is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2015, 8:12 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: West Coast, USA
Programs: Skywards Platinum
Posts: 3,747
Originally Posted by djurewicz
A small twin engine turboprop has one wing in the dirt at SJC. No fire, but lots of activity. Occurred around 10:45 this morning.
The plane was a Beechcraft Duke which just had normal turbocharged piston engines, it is not a turboprop.
whimike is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2015, 9:37 pm
  #5  
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: UA Plat/2MM [23-yr. 1K, now emeritus] clawing way back to WN-A List; MR LT Titanium; HY Whateverist.
Posts: 12,396
Please follow the thread as it moves to the San Francisco forum. Ocn Vw 1K, Moderator, TravelBuzz.
Ocn Vw 1K is offline  
Old Feb 24, 2015, 9:48 pm
  #6  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,631

Last edited by TWA884; Feb 25, 2015 at 8:33 am Reason: Reduce image size
TWA884 is offline  
Old Feb 27, 2015, 3:37 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA USA
Programs: AA, UA, WN, HH, Marriott
Posts: 7,290
Deleted

Last edited by JerryFF; Mar 1, 2015 at 10:53 am
JerryFF is offline  
Old Feb 28, 2015, 9:47 pm
  #8  
Moderator: Hilton Honors, Practical Travel Safety Issues & San Francisco
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: San Francisco CA
Programs: UA, Hilton, Priceline, AirBnB
Posts: 11,004
Wow. Great photo!

As I always say,
"If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going!"

Great first post. Thanks.
squeakr is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 10:51 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA USA
Programs: AA, UA, WN, HH, Marriott
Posts: 7,290
Deleted
JerryFF is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 2:34 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,156
Wow, I flew out of there about 2 hours before that happened.

SJC has 2 runways - 30L where this happened is the runway normally used for smaller planes. Scheduled flights almost always go from 30R/12L which is why there would have been no impact to normal operations.
docbert is offline  
Old Mar 1, 2015, 3:17 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: The Indo Jungle
Programs: AA EXP, IHG Spire
Posts: 1,319
An attorney flying his twin-engine plane from Southern California to Mineta San Jose International Airport for a client meeting was forced into an emergency landing after a landing-gear malfunctioned Tuesday morning, but he was still apparently able to make his appointment.
Haha, Love it.
DeepUnderground is offline  
Old Mar 2, 2015, 1:30 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA USA
Programs: AA, UA, WN, HH, Marriott
Posts: 7,290
Originally Posted by docbert
Wow, I flew out of there about 2 hours before that happened.

SJC has 2 runways - 30L where this happened is the runway normally used for smaller planes. Scheduled flights almost always go from 30R/12L which is why there would have been no impact to normal operations.
I'm sorry to disagree with some of your post but some of this information is not correct. There are actually 3 runways at SJC, not 2. Small aircraft primarily use runway 29, the one on the west side of the runway closest to private aircraft parking and FBOs. Arriving commercial flights primarily use runway 30L and departing commercial aircraft primarily use runway 30R.

http://www.airnav.com/airport/sjc

From the picture and the closeness of the buildings, it looks as if the aircraft landed on runway 29, and, as you correctly pointed out, why commercial traffic was not significantly disrupted.
JerryFF is offline  
Old Mar 3, 2015, 12:36 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,156
Originally Posted by JerryFF
From that very page :

RY 11/29 CLSD INDEFLY. NOW TWY W1. SURFACE IS USABLE ONLY AS TAXIWAY.

I flew out of SJC this morning. We left from 12L. Whilst we were taxing another commercial flight landed on 12L, and a small private jet took off from 12R.

Based on the NOTAM's, it looks like 11/29 was closed last July.

!SJC 07/002 SJC RWY 11/29 CHANGED TO TWY W1 1407022159-1507040659EST
!SJC 07/001 SJC RWY 11/29 CLSD 1407022144-1507040659EST

If you look on Google Maps satellite view you can see that they have blacked out the runway numbers at each end - although they covered "11" with 2 straight black strips, so you can still easily make out that it was previously runway 11.

Last edited by docbert; Mar 3, 2015 at 12:46 am
docbert is offline  
Old Mar 5, 2015, 10:59 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Santa Cruz, CA USA
Programs: AA, UA, WN, HH, Marriott
Posts: 7,290
Originally Posted by docbert
From that very page :

RY 11/29 CLSD INDEFLY. NOW TWY W1. SURFACE IS USABLE ONLY AS TAXIWAY.

I flew out of SJC this morning. We left from 12L. Whilst we were taxing another commercial flight landed on 12L, and a small private jet took off from 12R.

Based on the NOTAM's, it looks like 11/29 was closed last July.

!SJC 07/002 SJC RWY 11/29 CHANGED TO TWY W1 1407022159-1507040659EST
!SJC 07/001 SJC RWY 11/29 CLSD 1407022144-1507040659EST

If you look on Google Maps satellite view you can see that they have blacked out the runway numbers at each end - although they covered "11" with 2 straight black strips, so you can still easily make out that it was previously runway 11.
Thank you - correction accepted.
JerryFF is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.