View Poll Results: What is the best benefit of Qantas Frequent Flyer? PLEASE READ POST BELOW FIRST
800 minimum points
2
16.67%
Choice Rewards when hitting 2400 SCs
0
0%
Domestic Lounge Access on arrival incl 2 guests
1
8.33%
Additional award seat availability
1
8.33%
Any Seat Awards
0
0%
Lifetime Status
6
50.00%
I nominate a different benefit see my post below (POST YOUR SUGGESTION BELOW)
2
16.67%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll
FlyerTalk 2015 Awards benefits - Qantas Frequent Flyer, Middle East/Asia/Oceania
#16
No longer with Internet Brands
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: DL DM 1.6MM, Marriott LT Plat
Posts: 5,343
With respect that can't possibly be right. Every FFP I know has extra special benefits, usually unpublished, for the very few best members which they select.
That is not what has been included in the polls for the half dozen or so that I've looked at. For example no "get an aircraft named after you" listed in United, yet they provided this benefit to one FFP member, FTer ua1flyer.
Indeed FFPs may not want people disclosing these extra special benefits.
That is not what has been included in the polls for the half dozen or so that I've looked at. For example no "get an aircraft named after you" listed in United, yet they provided this benefit to one FFP member, FTer ua1flyer.
Indeed FFPs may not want people disclosing these extra special benefits.
#17
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,434
If not having an exhaustive knowledge of what the benefits are, why start trying to make certain items the ones to vote for?
Overall this seems crazy anyway if ending up with voting between schemes benefits and might as well have a vote of what is better , an apple or an orange
#18
Moderator, Hilton Honors
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: on a short leash
Programs: some
Posts: 71,419
#19
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,434
As voting ends it says something to me that the highest voted option is Lifetime Status - are there really no actual benefits of membership anymore?
I would suggest that this entry should not be even have been on artibrary list imposed given that it is not a benefit of the programme but simply a status that is earned, has no expiry from which benefits are derived
Status provides benefits rather than is a benefit itself surely ?
I would suggest that this entry should not be even have been on artibrary list imposed given that it is not a benefit of the programme but simply a status that is earned, has no expiry from which benefits are derived
Status provides benefits rather than is a benefit itself surely ?
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 20,923
#21
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,704
The fact that 6 out of 10 million people believe Lifetime Status is the highest value option is neither here nor there.
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,434
That there were only 12 votes says something, however the 10 million number isn't really relevant since [a] there are probably a lot of members whose accounts are inactive ( how many people actually close QF accounts ) and [b] not all 10 million are FT members
It seems risible to me that with 6 votes out of 12 cast that it would even be carried forward to an overall voting; for any meaning at all, surely there should have to be a minimum number of votes cast imo
Then again, since the options were foist upon the voters by someone who admits that they do not have a full understanding of the benefits of the scheme probably doesn't help either
It seems risible to me that with 6 votes out of 12 cast that it would even be carried forward to an overall voting; for any meaning at all, surely there should have to be a minimum number of votes cast imo
Then again, since the options were foist upon the voters by someone who admits that they do not have a full understanding of the benefits of the scheme probably doesn't help either
#23
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SYD (perenially), GVA (not in a long time)
Programs: QF PS, EK-Gold, Security Theatre Critic
Posts: 6,704
If there had been 6000 or 600 or even 60 votes for the option, that might mean something, but 6 out of (whatever larger number) is not significant.
EDIT: Okay, I looked. The EK choices looked reasonable; a total of 15 votes with 11 votes for one option and no votes for 5 of them. The SQ list (I was only ever Silver and only for a year) looked okay although some benefits were (I think) only for higher tiers; total of 12 votes with the winner getting 8.
The BA poll got 162 votes, although the top three options are pretty close (40, 38, 34 votes). UA got 208 votes with the top two getting 49 and 48 respectively.
What does all that mean? Dunno. But I think it means 6 votes doesn't say much about anything. (Nor does my one vote for another option that got 2 votes.)
Last edited by RadioGirl; Dec 22, 2014 at 11:45 pm
#24
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 44,434
One thing I think it means ( to me ) is that someone with no deep knowledge of the FF scheme should not be putting the choices in. Much better would be to have a discussion over benefits by the members on the forum and then the options suggested be put to a vote
#25
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP (OWE), VA PLAT, EY GLD, SPG PLAT, Hyatt DIA, Hilton DIA, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,509
No offence, I generally do these polls, however when it originally said '1,000 point minimum' I didn't bother. When the choices aren't accurate, what's the point of voting?