Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety and Security Issues
Reload this Page >

Hygiene: Can I request not to take my shoes off?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Hygiene: Can I request not to take my shoes off?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 29, 2007, 8:49 pm
  #61  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by eoinnz
Again your all worried about 10-15 seconds of walking on the floor than other parts of travelling. If food can stay on the floor for up to 45 seconds without contracting any germs, I'm sure 15 seconds is harmless for the majority. There are probably times where we have walked bare foot outside or wherever that would be just as, if not more 'germy' than an airport floor.
BS it's 15 seconds. Don't know what airport you go thru, but I was shoeless for multiple minutes each at BWI and SLC this week.

My backyard isn't teaming with thousands of people's germs walking thru day in and day out with little cleaning or regard for people.

And of course, some of the diseases found at airport checkpoints were listed in here http://www.airportbusiness.com/artic...tion=5&id=7090

If you would eat food dropped on a floor in a public place, go right ahead. However, what germs I expose myself to should be MY choice and not some TSA bureaucrats who can't even prove that there have been any shoe attempts (in fact, the admit they didn't).

http://travelnewsblog.latimes.com/da...t_shoe_ch.html

The original article is still there, but it's archived on the LA Times' website. I'm not paying for it, but it's an interesting read. Though you can find snippets in this thread.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showt...e+bomb+attacks

Super
Superguy is offline  
Old Jul 29, 2007, 9:48 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: AA, WN RR
Posts: 3,122
Originally Posted by eoinnz
Again your all worried about 10-15 seconds of walking on the floor than other parts of travelling. If food can stay on the floor for up to 45 seconds without contracting any germs, I'm sure 15 seconds is harmless for the majority. There are probably times where we have walked bare foot outside or wherever that would be just as, if not more 'germy' than an airport floor.

I do not eat any food that has fallen on the floor or ground, no matter how little time has passed between it hitting the surface and when it is picked up.

One's immune system is geared up for the germs in one's surroundings. Antigens/antibodies. People from all over the world pass through airport checkpoints. They bring exotic microbes with them. The risk of innocent people contracting illnesses increases dramatically when they are exposed to bacteria and viruses foreign to their immune systems. As stated before, the benefits of the shoe carnival (mandatory shoe/footwear removal for all) do not outweigh the risks of infection from this egregious breach of public hygiene.
PatrickHenry1775 is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2007, 5:14 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Paris
Posts: 577
Originally Posted by eoinnz
Again your all worried about 10-15 seconds of walking on the floor than other parts of travelling. If food can stay on the floor for up to 45 seconds without contracting any germs, I'm sure 15 seconds is harmless for the majority. There are probably times where we have walked bare foot outside or wherever that would be just as, if not more 'germy' than an airport floor.
Food dropped on the floor gets contaminated pretty much straight away:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/09/dining/09curi.html
Louie_LI is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2007, 5:21 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 36
Originally Posted by eoinnz
Again your all worried about 10-15 seconds of walking on the floor than other parts of travelling. If food can stay on the floor for up to 45 seconds without contracting any germs, I'm sure 15 seconds is harmless for the majority. There are probably times where we have walked bare foot outside or wherever that would be just as, if not more 'germy' than an airport floor.
I don't know where you've heard that food dropped on the floor for less than 45 seconds is safe to eat. There was actually a Mythbusters episode that tested "the five second rule" about food dropped on the floor. And even that was busted! They found that food became contaminated almost immediately.

The point that many of us are trying to make is that the TSA should be held accountable when its actions present a risk to public health, even if that risk is extremely small. If people want to eat off the floor, walk barefoot in an airplane lavatory, or pick their nose while driving, that's their choice. But a government agency should not force everyone to subject themselves to a security procedure that's unsanitary and undignified, especially when it's a total waste of time. An X-ray machine can't detect explosives hidden in shoes. And even if it could, there are many other articles of clothing (and body cavities) in which explosives could be concealed. "A small battery could also be used as a detonator" was one of Kip Hawley's reasons for lifting the ban on cigarette lighters. Why can't that same logic be applied to the Shoe Carnival?
Michelle2385 is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2007, 8:37 pm
  #65  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
I have always thought it was gross to walk around on the airport floor in my socks - it's also why I never wear flip flops when I fly. The idea of walking around in bare feet is just nasty.

Still...it's important to have some perspective here. I mean, if it were that easy, we'd all be dead by now. And it's not like anyone's feet are ever close to being sterile. It's one thing if you have open cuts on your feet - quite another if not. Your skin, after all, is DESIGNED to keep nasties out of your body.

Even though I know walking around in socks or bare feet is probably fine, if I have any extra time I just refuse to take my shoes off and let them swab me.

Oh, and to the guy who implied that people in Afghanistan are shorter-lived because of hygiene - you're wrong. People in Afghanistan are shorter-lived because they're caught in the crossfire between the US Army and the Taliban.
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Jul 30, 2007, 9:31 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In the corner plotting world domination
Programs: 1K
Posts: 1,122
For a minute I thought I had a line of defense for the TSA in relation to people walking around the airport bathrooms then in stocking feet through the security area; one thing cancelling out the other, if you will. But if you read to the end, you see that there's just not enough 'contact time' for it to work

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/070330.html

DD
Daringdoo is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 10:51 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 36
Originally Posted by gfunkdave

Even though I know walking around in socks or bare feet is probably fine, if I have any extra time I just refuse to take my shoes off and let them swab me.
Sadly, that is no longer an option. I guess you haven't flown since August 10th.
Michelle2385 is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 12:19 pm
  #68  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
Originally Posted by Michelle2385
Sadly, that is no longer an option. I guess you haven't flown since August 10th.
It's an option, but a painful and time consuming ending up with a full pat down and SSSS search of your baggage
GoingAway is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 12:27 pm
  #69  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by GoingAway
It's an option, but a painful and time consuming ending up with a full pat down and SSSS search of your baggage
Not always; often just the swab.
doober is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 12:30 pm
  #70  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
Originally Posted by doober
Not always; often just the swab.
are you just saying no or saying no due to a medical condition?
GoingAway is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 1:39 pm
  #71  
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
Originally Posted by doober
Originally Posted by GoingAway
It's an option, but a painful and time consuming ending up with a full pat down and SSSS search of your baggage
Not always; often just the swab.
sop is if no alarm and shoes are not removed, you and not your bags are subject to secondary. do not let them tell you otherwise. if the screener at the x-ray machine "passed" your bags, then they better explain the probable cause to you in front of a leo before opening and inspecting your bags.

Originally Posted by GoingAway
are you just saying no or saying no due to a medical condition?
i say "no" because i wear orthotics and have never had my carry-ons inspected; only me (and it's 50/50 for a swab 'n go and full body maSSSSage).
goalie is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 1:41 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,662
Originally Posted by doober
Providing that you are wearing a substantial pair of shoes and not loafers or flip-flops, just tell them you have orthopedic shoes and can't take them off.
I kinda have an issue with that - if you're not wearing orthopedic shoes or orthotics then you shouldn't lie and say that you are.

Originally Posted by breny
I do wear orthotics. The last time I kept my shoes on I got the full molester pat down, not the "swab only" I should have gotten.
Me too. SFO and ORD did it wrong - full grope including folding over the top of my pants. I told them both times, but the screeners didn't seem to speak English. Only FLL did it correctly AND they were very polite about it. I went over and thanked the supervisor having his people do their job correctly...but also because he was way hot.
JakiChan is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 2:02 pm
  #73  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Originally Posted by JakiChan
I kinda have an issue with that - if you're not wearing orthopedic shoes or orthotics then you shouldn't lie and say that you are.
I have absolutely no problem with being dishonest with an organization that is not honest with me. I also have no problem with being dishonest with an organization that "requires" shoe removal from babes in arms and elderly people.
doober is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 2:55 pm
  #74  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BWI
Programs: AA Gold, HH Diamond, National Emerald Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 15,180
Originally Posted by GoingAway
It's an option, but a painful and time consuming ending up with a full pat down and SSSS search of your baggage
So it's really no different than the retalation pre 8/10 when you dared to question a TSO's authoritah.
Superguy is offline  
Old Jul 31, 2007, 3:16 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Arizona
Programs: *wood Gold, Marriott Gold, DL Silver, Hilton Silver, F9 Ascent
Posts: 2,419
Re: flip flops...

A guy (white, mid 20's) in front of us at LAS D checkpoint refused to take off his flip-flops and they gave him a secondary. He was kinda loud and mouthy about it. When we were waiting for the train, I saw him being walked over to some side office by an airport cop. Musta got an attitude adjustment because we later saw him coming up the escalator while we were eating in the food area.
jonesing is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.