Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Flying with Cash INTRA USA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2007, 6:26 am
  #16  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,129
Originally Posted by vasantn
Believe me, cashier's checks are not the same as cash and, in fact, are often harder to negotiate than ordinary personal checks.
Correct--I've had two banks claim cashier's checks would take several days to clear despite the fact they were cashier's checks. Apparently they were worried they were frauds of some sort.
exerda is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 6:37 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by exerda
Correct--I've had two banks claim cashier's checks would take several days to clear despite the fact they were cashier's checks. Apparently they were worried they were frauds of some sort.
http://www.occ.treas.gov/ftp/ADVISORY/2007-1.html
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 6:54 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 628
Originally Posted by exerda
And remember: when it comes to forfeiture cases, your money is assumed to be "guilty" simply by nature of its existence, unlike (most) criminal cases in which the defendent is presumed innocent.
Perhaps there are some state laws to which you are referring. But in the federal system, probable cause is required to seize and a preponderance is required to forfeit. There's no presumption of guilt, although the fact that a person cannot explain how they acquired a large amount of cash goes quite a long way towards establishing probable cause, IMHO.
Deeg is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 7:15 am
  #19  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,129
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
The worst instance was a BoA cashier's check a friend sent me to cover his contribution toward Hokie Club dues + season tickets, for about $1500. I deposited it with BoA, and they held it for 2 days. I've had cashier's checks held longer, but that that one was drawn on one of their own accounts... sheesh.

I had another I used to pay off a credit card, drawn on my own account, and the bank put a "security freeze" on the funds for 5 days.
exerda is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 7:47 am
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,199
Originally Posted by Global_Hi_Flyer
...Bottom line: the government wants to be able to trace each and every financial transaction you make, and they assume that significant quantities of cash = criminal.
Some of us still desire the right to conduct personal financial transactions in private, and frankly what we do with our own money is nobody's business.

Until they outlaw cash and replace it with smart chip cards tied to your 'personal ID', there will always be people who want privacy, and always be people who equate privacy with 'criminal'.

Having to explain where my money came from to a bunch of airport rent-a-cops looking to make a quick score, is in my opinion, an assault on my liberty and privacy. I shouldn't have to explain to anyone where my money comes from. If a cop wants to take the opinion I am dealing drugs, then let them catch me in the act of dealing.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 8:03 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,498
I have a family member who doesn't use ATMs (long story), so when he travels he often has a few thousand in cash on him (almost never over $10k). One time TSA happened to notice the wad in his carryon (I think they opened it to pull out some dangerous toothpaste or something), and they took him to the booth, counted out the money and filled out a report.

I've been told by more than one TSAer that the report was not because my family member was doing anything illegal, but because TSA policy is to make a written record when they find large amounts of cash in case the pax ever accuse them of stealing some during the search.

My family member was peeved at the invasion of privacy, but I still haven't gotten him to use ATMs.


Edited to add: Here's a previous post on the subject, where Bart helpfully explained the TSA poilcy on this:

http://flyertalk.com/forum/showpost....2&postcount=94
themicah is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 9:34 am
  #22  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,129
Originally Posted by Deeg
Perhaps there are some state laws to which you are referring. But in the federal system, probable cause is required to seize and a preponderance is required to forfeit. There's no presumption of guilt, although the fact that a person cannot explain how they acquired a large amount of cash goes quite a long way towards establishing probable cause, IMHO.
As there have been several well-publicized cases of both the LEOs and even the courts accepting as "probable cause" the flimsiest of pretenses, and it is then up to the owner to prove to the court beyond a reasonable doubt not only that the money was legitimately acquired but also that it was being used "legitimately," I respectfully disagree with that characterization of the feds being so hands-off.
exerda is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 10:29 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
Originally Posted by exerda
Correct--I've had two banks claim cashier's checks would take several days to clear despite the fact they were cashier's checks. Apparently they were worried they were frauds of some sort.

I find it very hard to believe that in today's hi-tech world, a world where I can take money out of an ATM in Sydney, Australia and my account will instantly reflect the amount of money withdrawn AND the "ATM fee," too.

I find it very hard to believe that in today's hi-tech world that verification of a cashier's check takes several days.

The bank holds onto the check so they can collect the interest for that time. That one check doesn't make a ton of money for them, but when you do it nationwide, well....that's how banks get the dough to get those fancy offices in New York.

Threatening to leave the bank has, in the past, gotten my funds deposited in whole without delay.
LessO2 is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 11:42 am
  #24  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,129
Originally Posted by LessO2
The bank holds onto the check so they can collect the interest for that time. That one check doesn't make a ton of money for them, but when you do it nationwide, well....that's how banks get the dough to get those fancy offices in New York.

Threatening to leave the bank has, in the past, gotten my funds deposited in whole without delay.
One of my college professors told our class about his brother, who sued his bank over the holds, claiming they were indeed illegally making interest off his deposits and using that and only that as a reason to take time to clear the check. He settled for several hundred K, IIRC. Whether the story was true or apocryphal I don't know, but it is certainly illustrative of the point.

What I also find hard to believe is that now banks will withdraw your funds immediately upon someone depositing your check, but they still can claim deposited funds won't be available for a day (or more, depending on the type of check, etc.)
exerda is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 12:23 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Arizona
Programs: *wood Gold, Marriott Gold, DL Silver, Hilton Silver, F9 Ascent
Posts: 2,419
Originally Posted by Landing Gear
That's correct. Doing so will require the bank to generate a Suspicious Activity Report which MIGHT trigger a money laundering investigation.
And unlike the CTR which has a set limit of $10k for automatic reporting, a SAR is more subjective: The bank can file one for ANY amount. It's up to induvidual banks' policies. I found out with one bank the reporting threshhold varies depending on the type of account and branch location: business account for a car wash--$8,000; personal VIP account--$8,000; personal account for Joe Blow--$5,000; student account--$3,000.
jonesing is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 1:25 pm
  #26  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,199
Originally Posted by jonesing
And unlike the CTR which has a set limit of $10k for automatic reporting, a SAR is more subjective: The bank can file one for ANY amount. It's up to induvidual banks' policies. I found out with one bank the reporting threshhold varies depending on the type of account and branch location: business account for a car wash--$8,000; personal VIP account--$8,000; personal account for Joe Blow--$5,000; student account--$3,000.
Bank of America was (maybe still is) known for abusing this, filing reports on customers for the most trivial of events without their knowledge, well below the legal thresholds - as well as turning over customer banking records in their entirety upon request from the Government without any attempt to protect the customer's interests or privacy. Besides their horrific customer service, Bank of America is a big for this.
bocastephen is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 3:05 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DCA / WAS
Programs: DL 2+ million/PM, YX, Marriott Plt, *wood gold, HHonors, CO Plt, UA, AA EXP, WN, AGR
Posts: 9,388
Originally Posted by exerda
One of my college professors told our class about his brother, who sued his bank over the holds, claiming they were indeed illegally making interest off his deposits and using that and only that as a reason to take time to clear the check. He settled for several hundred K, IIRC. Whether the story was true or apocryphal I don't know, but it is certainly illustrative of the point.

What I also find hard to believe is that now banks will withdraw your funds immediately upon someone depositing your check, but they still can claim deposited funds won't be available for a day (or more, depending on the type of check, etc.)
The way they beat that now is to credit the funds as of date of deposit, but limit your access to the funds for a period of time. Thus (assuming you have an interest bearing account), you earn interest during the hold period.
Global_Hi_Flyer is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2007, 3:13 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Orlando, FL, US
Programs: DL-Dirt Medallion;US-Cast Iron Preferred; HH-Gold; Avis First
Posts: 3,617
Originally Posted by TierFlyer
Why not just take a cashier's check? Same as cash, you can take someone down to their bank and they get a "cash deposit."

It's been years (10+) but that is how I bought/sold several cars (ABICRI) so that I didn't have to carry actual cash.
Maybe the seller's main concern was keeping the transaction secret, vs. access to the funds.
djk7 is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2007, 9:18 am
  #29  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Columbus, OH
Programs: AA-EXP 3MM, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 582
Thanks for all of the responses so far.

I am a little bit concerned now as the amount in question is well over 10k. The money is from an elderly relative who's been literally saving it in their matress and wants me to take it and keep for them (deposited in my accounts). I'm starting to think that a very long road trip may be in order here. Though there's risk there too.
GeneCMH is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2007, 9:40 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,498
Originally Posted by GeneCMH
Thanks for all of the responses so far.

I am a little bit concerned now as the amount in question is well over 10k. The money is from an elderly relative who's been literally saving it in their matress and wants me to take it and keep for them (deposited in my accounts). I'm starting to think that a very long road trip may be in order here. Though there's risk there too.
Do you have an account with a bank that has a branch near the elderly relative? If so, just deposit it there before you fly home.
themicah is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.