Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CBP asking email password at POE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2015, 3:02 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by asiantraveler
Not to sound mean but they're just trying to keep America safe. It's a hard job. Just comply and get on your way. If you don't like it then don't come here. Pretty simple.
This is a very un-American post.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Apr 14, 2015, 3:05 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by BigOrangeTerp
The whole border electronics search thing is a combination of theater and gambling, with the hopes that some guy will be stupid enough to have a Word file on his desktop named "PLOT TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT.docx".
That one keeps half tempting me. The contents would be a fanciful plot to do exactly that--and the real contents would be a Whitespace program that spits out the master password for my password manager.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Apr 14, 2015, 3:05 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by chollie
This isn't really about terrorism. It's about child pornography and curiosity.
Mostly the former.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Apr 14, 2015, 4:38 pm
  #19  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by chollie
This isn't really about terrorism. It's about child pornography and curiosity.
The CBP's desire to access passenger email password is unlikely to be about the CBP's desire to find child pornography. It's also unlikely to have anything to do with terrorism.

It's more likely to do with CBP distrust about the work- or personal relationship-claims of the passenger as with regard to the purpose and duration of the trip.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 14, 2015, 6:45 pm
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,668
Originally Posted by GUWonder
The CBP's desire to access passenger email password is unlikely to be about the CBP's desire to find child pornography. It's also unlikely to have anything to do with terrorism.

It's more likely to do with CBP distrust about the work- or personal relationship-claims of the passenger as with regard to the purpose and duration of the trip.
Ah, yes. I always forget about the personal-relationship stuff. I knew it had next to nothing to do with terrorism and I think the hunt for child porn is largely triggered by pax demographics + travel patterns.
chollie is offline  
Old Apr 15, 2015, 8:04 am
  #21  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by chollie
Ah, yes. I always forget about the personal-relationship stuff. I knew it had next to nothing to do with terrorism and I think the hunt for child porn is largely triggered by pax demographics + travel patterns.
In the case of the CBP's hunt for child porn, it's pax demographics, travel pattern and sometimes some other governmental feedback that gets that ball rolling.

In the case of terrorism, if the CBP finds a terrorist at the US airport of entry after a flight to the U.S., then won't the DOJ/FBI, DNI, DHS and State have a lot more questions coming their way? Such questions wouldn't arise if CBP find someone with child porn or if they find someone who misrepresented -- willfully or not -- their personal/work relationships at a U.S. port of entry.

Once a passenger knows what is being sought and how it is sought, it becomes practically easier to set things up so as to minimize the chance of a show-stopping problem hitting when subject to secondary. Personally, I keep several different email accounts, and some are more interesting accounts than others.

Last edited by GUWonder; Apr 15, 2015 at 8:10 am
GUWonder is offline  
Old Apr 15, 2015, 8:44 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NYC
Programs: DL PM, Marriott Gold, Hertz PC, National Exec
Posts: 6,736
Originally Posted by GUWonder
It's more likely to do with CBP distrust about the work- or personal relationship-claims of the passenger as with regard to the purpose and duration of the trip.
In this case, it certainly sounds like CBP believed that the OP was violating or planning on violating the terms of his/her work visa, and that the contents of the email account would bear that out.
cestmoi123 is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2015, 2:33 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 506
Originally Posted by saveme1616
I was accused of violating terms of work visa just because they found someone else's document in my bag....and the whole thing took ugliest possible turns.
Just don't be carrying anyone else's documents... if I was a CBP officer
that might raise some questions with me too as to why you were in
possession of those.

I don't take my laptop with me crossing the border, but do take my phone
where I have access to personal/business email. If they want to look at it
I say have at it... at that point there are no passwords or security on it.

Just make sure there is nothing in your email that will cause you issues.
Paul56 is offline  
Old Apr 20, 2015, 8:09 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 471
Originally Posted by asiantraveler
Ok all of you guys are right. We all should not question anyone and check anything. We should welcome everyone with open arms. If something happens to your family or loved ones then oh well.
Oh, here comes the good old false dichotomy. You're right. There is nothing in between. We either need to get down on our knees and beg the CBP not to kill us, or we just invite ISIS to roll across the border. You sure are a critical thinker. You would have made a good little Hitlerjugend.
VelvetJones is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 7:15 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Spire Ambassador, Radisson Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 3,622
I think it would be helpful if the OP described his or her horrifying two hour ordeal in more detail and gives us some background information about what happened before we can opine.

Like other posters have mentioned, the CBP officers can ask anyone, foreigner or Us citizen, for passwords to electronic devices. You don't have to give them the passwords. But when you are a foreigner seeking entry to the U.S., your refusal to give them the password to an electronic device you are carrying can be used as a basis for refusing entry.

I think we also know, anecdotally, that many thousands of foreigners enter the US every day with smart phones and computers that may be password protected and that very few of those travelers are asked for the password by CBP. So there was probably something very unusual or suspicious about the OP's situation for it to get to the point of the CBP wanting to examine his or electronic devices.
jphripjah is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 8:41 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Trenton, NJ (PHL, EWR)
Programs: A3 Gold, BA Bronze
Posts: 1,633
I don't think if the government was really interested in you as a threat they'd need your password. They'd just have the NSA hack in. When my passport was flagged (US citizen) the indeterminate security official in Doha didn't ask for my passwords. Just my email address, telephone number, etc. I assume everything was all run through some sort of PRISM during my 14 hr flight back.
FlyIgglesFly is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 6:39 pm
  #27  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,122
Originally Posted by asiantraveler
You're just blowing things up. From the OP post, cbp just wanted OP to reveal the pw so they can access the laptop. How is that different than the OP entered pw? What account risk are you talking about? Should everyone turn off their electronic devices because it could be a potential risk? Or only when it's with cbp then all of no where it's at risk? Makes no sense. I rather have them do that and be safe even if it means they do a thorough search on me since I have nothing to hide.
E-mail password, not laptop password, FWIW. This goes well beyond inspecting the pax and his or her belongings IMHO.

(And though legally accepted, having to hand over even a laptop password is abhorrent.)
exerda is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 7:39 pm
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Hilton Diamond, IHG Spire Ambassador, Radisson Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 3,622
Originally Posted by exerda
(And though legally accepted, having to hand over even a laptop password is abhorrent.)
It's not legally accepted that anyone has to hand over a laptop password. Aliens have the right to refuse but they might be put on the next plane home. Citizens have a right to refuse and be admitted, but their laptop can be seized if CBP has reasonable suspicion that there is evidence of criminal activity on it. I don't find that abhorrent.
jphripjah is offline  
Old Apr 21, 2015, 8:03 pm
  #29  
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,122
Originally Posted by jphripjah
It's not legally accepted that anyone has to hand over a laptop password. Aliens have the right to refuse but they might be put on the next plane home. Citizens have a right to refuse and be admitted, but their laptop can be seized if CBP has reasonable suspicion that there is evidence of criminal activity on it. I don't find that abhorrent.
Well, when the choice is be refused entry or to have your laptop seized, that's IMHO forcing you to hand over the password (see "Rubber hose cryptanalysis").

And yes, I find that absolutely abhorrent. Why should a US citizen be forced to provide the key to enter their laptop, or to have that property stolen by CBP? That is a gross violation of the 4th and 5th Amendments IMHO.
exerda is offline  
Old Apr 22, 2015, 10:37 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 416
A few of you have misread. The op said they asked for the email account password, he didn't mention the laptop password.

I would refuse, they can go get a warrant if they desperately need to read my emails.
nmh1204 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.