How secure is luggage going under plane on puddle jumpers?
#1
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 817
How secure is luggage going under plane on puddle jumpers?
I often take flights in the midwest that are on relatively small aircraft. (United Express to Ohare, US Airways express to DCA, etc)
Some of these flights, there's not much overhead space so people are asked to put their larger carryons below the plane for free.
How safe is this? I have a DSLR that doesn't fit in my backpack but fits comfortably in my larger carry on. The case locks, but it's a "TSA approved" (AKA backdoored) combo lock.
Some of these flights, there's not much overhead space so people are asked to put their larger carryons below the plane for free.
How safe is this? I have a DSLR that doesn't fit in my backpack but fits comfortably in my larger carry on. The case locks, but it's a "TSA approved" (AKA backdoored) combo lock.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 17,907
Hi,
I have not had any problems with gate checked bags on AA/American Eagle getting damaged ( items being stolen) but I have not put a DSLR or any valuables in it ( the potential for being damaged and stolen as well as the risk that insurance will not pay out for it).
I have a Nikon D5000 DSLR and have a small camera bag ( enough fro the DSLR, 2 small lenses and other stuff) and I take this out of my standard carry on and take it onboard the ERJ/CRJs with me and have been able to put it in the overhead or under the seat in front of me.
If you have more lenses or larger lenses then this will be more of an issue.
Regards
TBS
I have not had any problems with gate checked bags on AA/American Eagle getting damaged ( items being stolen) but I have not put a DSLR or any valuables in it ( the potential for being damaged and stolen as well as the risk that insurance will not pay out for it).
I have a Nikon D5000 DSLR and have a small camera bag ( enough fro the DSLR, 2 small lenses and other stuff) and I take this out of my standard carry on and take it onboard the ERJ/CRJs with me and have been able to put it in the overhead or under the seat in front of me.
If you have more lenses or larger lenses then this will be more of an issue.
Regards
TBS
#4
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
Luggage security in the belly of a regional flight? No different than that on a mainline flight. Same baggage handlers. And I haven't heard of any significant differences in baggage falling out of different aircraft. It might even be safe on regional which tend to have fewer cargo hold fires.
#5
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
I would feel more comfortable gate checking a valuable. The bag is out of your sight for less time and compared to checked baggage isn't as accessible to as many people such as the TSA and other passengers.
#6
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: CLE
Programs: UA Gold, HH Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,660
I watched bags being unloaded from a UA Express and one of the valet checked bags bounced from the baggage compartment door to the tarmac. I wouldn't put anything valuable in a valet checked bag. I have a rolling camera bag that fits under the seat on the puddle jumpers. One of the seats on the two seat side. It won't fit under the seat on the side with only one seat.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2013
Programs: Marriott Tit, Hyatt Diamond, AA EXP, UA Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 427
#9
Suspended
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 817
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
UA expressly excludes valuables from coverage in checked luggage (checked = checked, so counter vs. gate doesn't matter). If you regularly fly aircraft where you will gate check, I would separate out the valuables and keep them with me.
I don't think that there is any greater risk. You have no idea what happens to counter-checked bags bouncing off the conveyor of non-containerized mainlines.
I don't think that there is any greater risk. You have no idea what happens to counter-checked bags bouncing off the conveyor of non-containerized mainlines.
#11
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,187
Not often, but it does happen:
http://avherald.com/h?article=4613943a&opt=7168
As larger aircraft carry more cargo they naturally have a greater chance of fire. Particularly if the cargo is hazardous:
http://avherald.com/h?article=4307772e/0006&opt=7168
Still, most fire diversions turn out to be false alarms or simply smoke or other gasses (emitted often by animal and plant cargo).
http://avherald.com/h?article=4613943a&opt=7168
As larger aircraft carry more cargo they naturally have a greater chance of fire. Particularly if the cargo is hazardous:
http://avherald.com/h?article=4307772e/0006&opt=7168
Still, most fire diversions turn out to be false alarms or simply smoke or other gasses (emitted often by animal and plant cargo).
#12
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,127
Are you talking about planeside bag check & claim (where you don't have to go to baggage claim)? That's much "safer" from a risk of theft than regular checked luggage given it's handled by fewer people and out of your possession a shorter time (and typically in sight the entire time it's in anyone else's possession, if you're seated on the correct side of the plane--the left for many regional a/c).
I still wouldn't want to give them something particularly fragile or valuable, and there's still the chance it could end up being sent to bag claim in some fairly rare cases, but overall, planeside "gate checks" are okay.
I still wouldn't want to give them something particularly fragile or valuable, and there's still the chance it could end up being sent to bag claim in some fairly rare cases, but overall, planeside "gate checks" are okay.