Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

US's Parker: Expect TSA to Become Carry-On Police

US's Parker: Expect TSA to Become Carry-On Police

Old Aug 25, 2011, 4:56 am
  #76  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: RDU
Programs: OnePass
Posts: 772
Originally Posted by Often1
There are two "barriers" to boarding a commercial aircraft: 1) security checkpoint; and 2) gate. #2 is far preferable place and allows flexibility but carriers can't/won't enforce. That leaves #1 which is not preferable for a broad variety of reasons, but can be accomplished.
The TSA can't do the job it's currently tasked to do. What makes you think that they're capable of doing this too?

The only thing the TSA is capable of catching is a cold, however, they need multiple "training" sessions to do even that right.
mikemey is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2011, 9:36 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: BHM
Programs: AAdvantage
Posts: 83
Originally Posted by stifle
Nobody seems to have mentioned yet that defining carry-on sizes in terms of inches will confuse the all-but-2 other countries in the world that use the metric system.
All the airlines listed in my earlier post defined maximum carry-on bag size in centimeters as well as in inches, but for the sake of simplicity I only typed the non-metric measurements in that post.
BamaDude is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2011, 2:45 pm
  #78  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Programs: UA Mileage Plus, AA Advantage
Posts: 5,983
NO!!!! I don't want the TSA getting involved in anything else more then they already are.
CubsFanJohn is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2011, 4:16 pm
  #79  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Programs: WN Nothing and spending the half million points from too many flights, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,043
Let's work out a trade. We let the TSA be the carry on enforcers and the airlines take back security.
InkUnderNails is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2011, 4:52 pm
  #80  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: HOU, occasional IAH
Programs: WN A+ CP, IHG Status-of-the-Day, Avis First. **Freedom fighter: One grope at a time.**
Posts: 392
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
Let's work out a trade. We let the TSA be the carry on enforcers and the airlines take back security.
Not a bad idea, but how 'bout we just get rid of the whole TSA?

Or better yet, keep one per airport and change their title to OBS (Official Bag Sizer).
CavePearl is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2011, 1:41 pm
  #81  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS MVPG100K, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,486
An incident with a bag-inspecting CATSA screener at YQB last year belatedly came to mind.

We were boarding a UX flight to ORD for which our reasonably-sized roll-aboards would be gate-checked anyway.

No dice. The screener who was checking BPs and admitting pax into the security area made us use the sizer and they wouldn't fit. Despite my explaining the gate-check aspect to him, he required us to return to the front counter and check them. We haven't experienced similar problems flying out of YVR or YEG so I guess it's a Quebec thing (and I suspected the smallish-looking sizer was a French import ) but this CATSA screener was definitely acting as the Carry-On Gendarme.
Fredd is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2011, 3:04 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Monterey Bay Area
Programs: Independent Libertarian
Posts: 326
Two Kinds Of Bags!

1.LOST Bags @:-) 2.CARRY-ON BAGS!
bajajoes is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2011, 11:09 pm
  #83  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 79
TSOs get hired as long as they can maintain a body temperature somewhere in the 90's. Why would anyone expect them to know the allowable bag sizes for every class on every aircraft on every airline on any specific day? I wouldn't expect an old-school travel agent to know that without having to look it up on a chart - so why should we slow down the line waiting for a two striper to come over and do the reading?

Last edited by scoow; Sep 4, 2011 at 12:02 am Reason: unnecessary
darwin76 is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2011, 6:37 am
  #84  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
TSA is already a carry-on police of some sort, but there is the practical matter of the TSA's practical incapability to do more than it is already doing in this regard.

Consider the fact that not all airlines have the same carry-on policies, and also consider that not all passengers are subject to the same carry-on policy as all other passengers on a given airline. Combine that together and the TSA would have to not only be trained by each of the airlines about the policies generally applicable to most passengers but they would also have to be trained about the differences applicable to different passengers for the same and/or different airlines.

Given that the TSA has enough trouble performing perfectly even with regard to some of the policies/practices created by the TSA itself, complicating the TSA's job with airline check-in and/or gate-agent training and training updates with regard to carry-on baggage is just further invitation for failure. When even check-in and/or gate-agents for the airline aren't consistent, why would the TSA be any better than the airline employees in performing such task? I see nothing to suggest that the TSA would do this job any better, although perhaps the government (in the form of the TSA) is more intimidating to passengers at airports than airline employees. Is that what this is about? Then no thank you.
GUWonder is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2011, 9:33 am
  #85  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: west of DFW airport
Programs: AA LT Gold 1.9 MM flying my way to LT PLAT
Posts: 11,074
The TSA has been the carry on police at DFW for a very long time. Issues are: too many bags (purses included), too large bags and too many items in general.

We are used to it.
oldpenny16 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2011, 10:36 am
  #86  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Detroit; Formerly Dubai
Posts: 3,652
Turning the person around won't be a problem -- you escort the person to the crew/handicap line and tell them to exit through that. The problem will be missed flights, whether the TSA should give them a pass to cut to the front of the line after checking the items, etc.
Dubai Stu is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2011, 10:49 am
  #87  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by Dubai Stu
Turning the person around won't be a problem -- you escort the person to the crew/handicap line and tell them to exit through that. The problem will be missed flights, whether the TSA should give them a pass to cut to the front of the line after checking the items, etc.
No passes. The way to obtain compliance for something as simple as carry on restrictions is to make it a PITA. You show up with non-compliant carryons, you get kicked out of line, sent back to the counter and then to the back of the checkpoint line. Once the word gets out that this is enforced, it will stop.
Often1 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2011, 5:09 pm
  #88  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by Often1
No passes. The way to obtain compliance for something as simple as carry on restrictions is to make it a PITA. You show up with non-compliant carryons, you get kicked out of line, sent back to the counter and then to the back of the checkpoint line. Once the word gets out that this is enforced, it will stop.
Which is precisely why the airlines would love to have TSA police this rather than do it themselves. Let TSA be the PITA, and let the airlines come across as angelic beings ready to cater to every passenger's need --- even though it's the airlines' rules that would be enforced by TSA.
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2011, 7:52 pm
  #89  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
Which is precisely why the airlines would love to have TSA police this rather than do it themselves. Let TSA be the PITA, and let the airlines come across as angelic beings ready to cater to every passenger's need --- even though it's the airlines' rules that would be enforced by TSA.
I'm fine w. TSA handling this. Cutting down on the volume of carryons would speed up the line anyway. It's clear to me that the carriers won't enforce their own rules and that even stepped up enforcement by FAA, including fining GA's hasn't made a difference.
Often1 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2011, 8:15 pm
  #90  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by Often1
I'm fine w. TSA handling this. Cutting down on the volume of carryons would speed up the line anyway.
I'm not.

First of all, it's outside of TSA's charter. TSA is charged with securing transportation systems, not dealing with number, size, and weight restrictions on bags. And since TSA has to screen both checked and unchecked bags, it really shouldn't matter to TSA how many checked bags happen.

Originally Posted by Often1
It's clear to me that the carriers won't enforce their own rules
So the solution is to have someone else enforce the rules? Balderdash. If the airline won't enforce their own rules, the airline should change the rules into a form they are willing to enforce.
jkhuggins is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.