Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Another pleasant arrival in Canada

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2011, 8:42 am
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Doha, Qatar
Programs: Air Canada Aeroplan, Lufthansa Miles & More, Flying Blue, Hyatt Gold Passport
Posts: 1,894
Another pleasant arrival in Canada

Flew into YUL yesterday for the first time in 5 years -- I used to come here frequently, and also was harassed frequently there by Canadian immigration. This time was refreshingly different -- no threats, no aggressive questioning, no search. However, after clearing immigration and going downstairs to baggage claim, I notice that the agent has stamped my declaration but not my passport. This happened to me once before, and on my way out of the country, I had the agent look at stamp from my previous visit which was several months old, and start screaming at me that I had overstayed and was going to be arrested. So I went and found an agent and asked that my passport also be stamped. He said, "oh, American passport, you don't need to be stamped".
I said, "OK, it doesn't matter how long I stay? If I stay for 10 years it won't be a problem?"
He says "you get six months"
"And without a stamp, how do you know it's been six months?"

His reply: "that's why they invented computers"

I am simply stunned, but ask "do you honestly believe that the guys who invented computers were thinking 'let's build a machine that it make it easier for governments to monitor citizens'? Or do you think maybe those guys are horrified at some of the things computers are being used for?"

He didn't have a response, but gave me my entry stamp.

Every encounter leaves me thinking, "where do they find these people?"
polonius is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 9:30 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,849
What agent was screaming at you last time? Canada does not have exit controls. At what point did you come in contact with this officer?
yyzvoyageur is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 10:11 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto, NYC, somewhere on planet Earth
Programs: UA 1K, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 8,289
Sounds like a pleasant arrival turned unpleasant by your actions.
neuron is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 12:35 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC Aeroplan - Elite Status. DL Skymiles - Regular Status
Posts: 509
Originally Posted by neuron
Sounds like a pleasant arrival turned unpleasant by your actions.
^.

You should be lucky they didn't deny you entry for making that "staying 10 year" statement.

I know you were saying that to him hypothetically, and you don't intend to remain in Canada for 10 years, that statement would have been sufficient enough to turn you around.
alexb133 is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 1:14 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
It would been simpler to take a photo of the stamped arrival card.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 3:30 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,849
Originally Posted by alexb133
You should be lucky they didn't deny you entry for making that "staying 10 year" statement.

I know you were saying that to him hypothetically, and you don't intend to remain in Canada for 10 years, that statement would have been sufficient enough to turn you around.
No, it would have been far from sufficient. There's nothing in our immigration act that deems someone inadmissible for an off-the-cuff remark or question.

Originally Posted by mre5765
It would been simpler to take a photo of the stamped arrival card.
That wouldn't solve anything. The stamp on the declaration form is not indicative of the length of time for which one is authorised entry.

It's true that officers are not required to stamp American passports. In the absence of any indication otherwise, a foreign national is authorised to enter for a period of six months. For every American entering Canada who wants a stamp in his passport, there are three or four carrying nearly full documents who are thankful when they don't get stamped. Anyhow, I can understand the desire to have a stamp even if one is not needed. Next time be careful to note whether or not the officer in the booth has stamped your passport. He should be a lot more willing to provide a stamp upon request than another officer who hasn't already dealt with you and is not the one who has authorised your entry.

OP, I'm still curious about this other officer who apparently threatened to arrest you for overstaying. Was this a CBSA officer? Where did you encounter this person (In a passport control booth? At the gate?) Where were you heading?
yyzvoyageur is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 3:32 pm
  #7  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
Originally Posted by yyzvoyageur
What agent was screaming at you last time? Canada does not have exit controls. At what point did you come in contact with this officer?
Yes, I am also curious about that . . .
Ari is offline  
Old Aug 14, 2011, 3:43 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC Aeroplan - Elite Status. DL Skymiles - Regular Status
Posts: 509
Originally Posted by yyzvoyageur
No, it would have been far from sufficient. There's nothing in our immigration act that deems someone inadmissible for an off-the-cuff remark or question.
They have a lot of discretion. If that officer wanted to make the OPs life miserable - believe me he could have. A very powerful type of discretion they have, is that the officer could have really "believed" the OP intended to stay in Canada for 10 years, rather than treating it as an off-the cut remark.

The IRPA is very clear about who's admitted to Canada by right - Citizens, Registered Indians, and PRs (as long as they still have that status).

There's no provision that would prohibit the officer from using the staying in Canada 10 years remark as ground for inadmissibility

Last edited by alexb133; Aug 14, 2011 at 3:49 pm
alexb133 is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011, 2:52 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by polonius
This happened to me once before, and on my way out of the country, I had the agent look at stamp from my previous visit which was several months old, and start screaming at me that I had overstayed and was going to be arrested.
I travelled to Canada many many times and not even once was I checked by the CBSA upon exiting the country. Maybe, this incident happened to you in a country that has outbound immigration control and which immigration laws you violated (you admitted you've done that numerous times)? And then you decided to extrapolate that experience onto Canada for a more dramatic effect? Or it never happened to begin with?
König is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011, 7:41 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by Ari
Yes, I am also curious about that . . .
OP may have confused a Canadian 'exit' check with the US pre-clearance, although why a US agent would care how long the stay was I can't imagine.

Could have been a non-standard 'spot' check but I've never heard of those at YUL or anywhere else in Canada. Anyway all entry and exit data is indeed computerized now by land or air so I don't know why any passport gets stamped any longer.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011, 9:16 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by yyzvoyageur

That wouldn't solve anything. The stamp on the declaration form is not indicative of the length of time for which one is authorised entry.
Let visit one be the visit recorded on his passport. Let visit two be the visit recorded on his arrival card and smart phone. Let visit three be the one after visits one and two. If the dates of visits one and two are less than six months apart, then on departure from visit two, if the date is more than six months after visit one started but less than six months after visit two started, his smart phone photo saves the day. If the date of visit three is less than six months after the start of visit two, then the smart phone saves the day.

Even if the cbsa accuses op of faking the photo, the date can be looked up in the computer.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Aug 15, 2011, 7:11 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,162
My Recent Experiences Truly WERE Pleasant!

Recently, I was on a "grey-beard" panel supporting a Canadian government national security program. From last fall until last month, I was making monthly Dulles-Ottawa trips. NOT ONCE did I encounter anyone -- Canadian or U.S. CBP at the pre-clearance area at YOW -- anything other than completely professional. On my last trip, the Canadian guy asked me if I "was gong to leave anything in Canada." My response was, "Some good advice, I hope."

On the U.S. pre-clearance side, I asked a couple of the agents if these overseas assignments were really competitive and desired. Every one of them said "Yes" and that they were lucky to have gotten these jobs.

I will never forget a conversation I had with a U.S. CPB guy at YOW. Because I carry an official passport, I'm almost always asked the agency I work for. I tell them (because I can tell them in my current position) and tell them they can blame me for what my agency does. I went through this dialogue at YOW once with a CBP guy the size of an NFL linebacker. He looked me right in the eye and said, "I grew up in South Florida and what you guys do for us down there is a blessing." I was truly blown away. I responded by telling him that I knew the director and quite a few of the folks who worked at the place he was talking about. I told him that those folks were much too humble to comprehend that they save tens of thousands of lives every year.

Maybe it was because I was traveling between national capitals, but, I seemed to have found the cream of the crop on both sides of the birder.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2011, 12:30 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: MYF/CMA/SAN/YYZ/YKF
Programs: COdbaUA 1K MM, AA EXP, Bonbon Gold, GHA Titanium, Hertz PC, NEXUS and GE
Posts: 5,837
Originally Posted by alexb133
They have a lot of discretion. If that officer wanted to make the OPs life miserable - believe me he could have. A very powerful type of discretion they have, is that the officer could have really "believed" the OP intended to stay in Canada for 10 years, rather than treating it as an off-the cut remark.

The IRPA is very clear about who's admitted to Canada by right - Citizens, Registered Indians, and PRs (as long as they still have that status).

There's no provision that would prohibit the officer from using the staying in Canada 10 years remark as ground for inadmissibility
The person who you quoted and attempted to contradict works for the CBSA. You should probably defer to him.
N1120A is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2011, 6:40 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC Aeroplan - Elite Status. DL Skymiles - Regular Status
Posts: 509
Originally Posted by N1120A
The person who you quoted and attempted to contradict works for the CBSA. You should probably defer to him.
Haha I didn't know.

But even though there's no official rule, officers have a ton of discretion, and could (if they wanted to) look for ways to make his life miserable, and possibly even deny him entry.
alexb133 is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2011, 6:49 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Programs: EVA Air , * G, QR Privilege Club S
Posts: 5,170
I am amazed as well regarding the exit passport check in Canada. I travel a lot in and out and never has seen an exit passport check. Of course the airline staff would scan in your passport and that goes into the data bases so the Authorities know who comes in and goes but there is no physical passport check in Canada as far as I know.
Davvidd is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.