Nude-o-scope fun at National
Oct 19, 2010, 9:27 am
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Nude-o-scope fun at National
Was flying out of National yesterday and got in the line right next to the one with the nude-o-scope. As we got to the front of the line, the lady in the NoS line announced loudly that she was not going to wait in that line and would move to the end of one of the lines with the "normal" security. I told her that she could simply opt out, go through a "special" pat-down and be on her way (Note: to this day, I have yet to understand why people in the regular line don't have to get a pat-down, but people who refuse the NoS and go through the same WTMD that everyone else does do). She had never known that and went off about the fact that the TSA needs to put up signage that the NoS is optional. We agreed.
But the best part of the whole day was that the people in the NoS line started shouting to the people in back of them, "It's voluntary! You can skip the strip search and get a pat-down!" It seemed that nobody in the nude-o-scope line knew that (no wonder we have 95% compliance), but there were a lot of people that chose to opt out. In fact, so many opted out that the TSOs didn't even bother doing the full body massage with the unhappy ending.
Big ^, btw, to the TSO checking ID's at the WTMD, who just sat there silently, looking amused.
Mike
But the best part of the whole day was that the people in the NoS line started shouting to the people in back of them, "It's voluntary! You can skip the strip search and get a pat-down!" It seemed that nobody in the nude-o-scope line knew that (no wonder we have 95% compliance), but there were a lot of people that chose to opt out. In fact, so many opted out that the TSOs didn't even bother doing the full body massage with the unhappy ending.
Big ^, btw, to the TSO checking ID's at the WTMD, who just sat there silently, looking amused.
Mike
Oct 19, 2010, 10:10 am
#3
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Was flying out of National yesterday and got in the line right next to the one with the nude-o-scope. As we got to the front of the line, the lady in the NoS line announced loudly that she was not going to wait in that line and would move to the end of one of the lines with the "normal" security. I told her that she could simply opt out, go through a "special" pat-down and be on her way (Note: to this day, I have yet to understand why people in the regular line don't have to get a pat-down, but people who refuse the NoS and go through the same WTMD that everyone else does do). She had never known that and went off about the fact that the TSA needs to put up signage that the NoS is optional. We agreed.
But the best part of the whole day was that the people in the NoS line started shouting to the people in back of them, "It's voluntary! You can skip the strip search and get a pat-down!" It seemed that nobody in the nude-o-scope line knew that (no wonder we have 95% compliance), but there were a lot of people that chose to opt out. In fact, so many opted out that the TSOs didn't even bother doing the full body massage with the unhappy ending.
Big ^, btw, to the TSO checking ID's at the WTMD, who just sat there silently, looking amused.
Mike
But the best part of the whole day was that the people in the NoS line started shouting to the people in back of them, "It's voluntary! You can skip the strip search and get a pat-down!" It seemed that nobody in the nude-o-scope line knew that (no wonder we have 95% compliance), but there were a lot of people that chose to opt out. In fact, so many opted out that the TSOs didn't even bother doing the full body massage with the unhappy ending.
Big ^, btw, to the TSO checking ID's at the WTMD, who just sat there silently, looking amused.
Mike
Oct 19, 2010, 10:24 am
#4
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: *wood Gold
Posts: 1,781
OMG! 
The "required" signage showing what the NoS does and stating that it's optional was missing?
@:-) Surely Bob will be on the case for us quickly, as this is in his backyard, just two Metro stops down from TSA HQ.
I suppose this demonstrates yet again that TSA can only achieve compliance for its useless, invasive procedures by keeping people uneducated about alternatives.
The "required" signage showing what the NoS does and stating that it's optional was missing? @:-) Surely Bob will be on the case for us quickly, as this is in his backyard, just two Metro stops down from TSA HQ.
I suppose this demonstrates yet again that TSA can only achieve compliance for its useless, invasive procedures by keeping people uneducated about alternatives.
Oct 19, 2010, 10:28 am
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,603
OMG! The "required" signage showing what the NoS does and stating that it's optional was missing?
@:-) Surely Bob will be on the case for us quickly, as this is in his backyard, just two Metro stops down from TSA HQ.
I suppose this demonstrates yet again that TSA can only achieve compliance for its useless, invasive procedures by keeping people uneducated about alternatives.
The "required" signage showing what the NoS does and stating that it's optional was missing? @:-) Surely Bob will be on the case for us quickly, as this is in his backyard, just two Metro stops down from TSA HQ.
I suppose this demonstrates yet again that TSA can only achieve compliance for its useless, invasive procedures by keeping people uneducated about alternatives.
fwiw, I did read a report that they were using the machines as primary at BWI recently. What happened to the promise that they were not to be used for primary?
Oct 19, 2010, 10:44 am
#7
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 549
Even at airports where the signage is there, it's generally 2 8.5"x11" sheets of paper with font so small that I have, as of yet, been unable to actually see the opt out language on it. At least half of one of those sheets is dedicated to a drawing of how to assume the surrender position.
Oct 19, 2010, 12:10 pm
#9
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Both times I've been through the line it was specifically explained to me by a TSO that I could opt-out.
They require the groping of those in the imaging line only because one of the purposes of the test is to test the WHOLE process, and part of the whole process is the opt-out.
But, I don't know why they are still testing these things. They must have figured out by now that they are much slower than other screening methods.
They require the groping of those in the imaging line only because one of the purposes of the test is to test the WHOLE process, and part of the whole process is the opt-out.
But, I don't know why they are still testing these things. They must have figured out by now that they are much slower than other screening methods.
Oct 19, 2010, 12:15 pm
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Finally back in Boston after escaping from New York
Posts: 13,644
Even at airports where the signage is there, it's generally 2 8.5"x11" sheets of paper with font so small that I have, as of yet, been unable to actually see the opt out language on it. At least half of one of those sheets is dedicated to a drawing of how to assume the surrender position.
I bring this thread up not to generate praise for myself (okay, maybe a little
), but rather, to heap praise upon all of the folks behind me who passed along the message to their fellow travelers. And to point out, not that any of us missed the point anyway, that the reason the TSA has so few people opting out is because they may not know they can.And these machines were definitely primary for the people unfortunate enough to choose that line (randomly).
Mike
Oct 19, 2010, 12:17 pm
#11
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
Both times I've been through the line it was specifically explained to me by a TSO that I could opt-out.
They require the groping of those in the imaging line only because one of the purposes of the test is to test the WHOLE process, and part of the whole process is the opt-out.
But, I don't know why they are still testing these things. They must have figured out by now that they are much slower than other screening methods.
They require the groping of those in the imaging line only because one of the purposes of the test is to test the WHOLE process, and part of the whole process is the opt-out.
But, I don't know why they are still testing these things. They must have figured out by now that they are much slower than other screening methods.
Oct 19, 2010, 12:43 pm
#12
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IAD, and sometimes OMNI/PR. Currently: not far from IAD, but home will always be SAN (not far from the "touch my junk and I'll have you arrested" Memorial TSA Check Point) even if I'm not there so much these days.
Programs: UA, CO, Calcifer Award for Mad Haiku Skillz
Posts: 5,076
I opted out at SAN the other day and the TSO guy responded with: "You DON'T want to go through the scanner?" He could have been saying "You DON'T want to ride on the Matterhorn?" or "You DON'T want a million dollars?"
I just laughed at him and said, "No thanks." The woman who did the pat down was very professional, even a bit apologetic in tone, told me exactly what she was going to do, did the pat down quickly, apologized that I would need to wait while the gloves she wore were tested for explosives, and I was on my way in another minute or so.
OPT OUT. I like it as a slogan. Short, sweet, and to the point.
I just laughed at him and said, "No thanks." The woman who did the pat down was very professional, even a bit apologetic in tone, told me exactly what she was going to do, did the pat down quickly, apologized that I would need to wait while the gloves she wore were tested for explosives, and I was on my way in another minute or so.
OPT OUT. I like it as a slogan. Short, sweet, and to the point.
Oct 19, 2010, 3:00 pm
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
The strip search machine is voluntary. You can opt-out of the strip search and get a pat-down. Pass the message on to the person in line behind you.
Enough people do this at TSA security checkpoints, and the TSA will -- sooner than later -- end up doing something -- better or worse -- differently.
Enough people do this at TSA security checkpoints, and the TSA will -- sooner than later -- end up doing something -- better or worse -- differently.
Oct 19, 2010, 3:20 pm
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
Oct 19, 2010, 5:41 pm
#15
Moderator: Smoking Lounge; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: Lifetime (for now) Gold MM, HH Gold, Giving Tootsie Pops to UA employees, & a retired hockey goalie
Posts: 28,878
TSA mouthpiece Ann Davis was saying it was 99%, now Nico Melendez is saying 90%. I wonder how far they will have to readjust their figures after the "new procedures" are announced.
) for them to get this simple thing correct