ACLU quesitioning enhanced patdowns
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 15,967
ACLU quesitioning enhanced patdowns
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/...html?tag=stack
The Boston Herald reports that Transportation Security Administration screeners at Logan International Airport are testing what one official called an "enhanced patdown." It lets screeners use a palms-forward, slide-down search procedure on passengers' bodies.
It replaces the old back-of-the-hand patdown for passengers who don't want to go through full-body scanning machines.
The TSA says the new procedure is also being tested at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas before a national rollout.
The ACLU questions whether the new technique is effective enough to justify what it calls a "seemingly constant erosion of privacy."
The Boston Herald reports that Transportation Security Administration screeners at Logan International Airport are testing what one official called an "enhanced patdown." It lets screeners use a palms-forward, slide-down search procedure on passengers' bodies.
It replaces the old back-of-the-hand patdown for passengers who don't want to go through full-body scanning machines.
The TSA says the new procedure is also being tested at McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas before a national rollout.
The ACLU questions whether the new technique is effective enough to justify what it calls a "seemingly constant erosion of privacy."
#2
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,946
"So people unable to lift their arms above their heads have to let some stranger feel them up. Or stay at home. This is disgusting."
Good comment. ^
The scumbags "in charge" of TSA who keep up the assault on civil liberties and privacy should be caned and sent to prison.
Good comment. ^
The scumbags "in charge" of TSA who keep up the assault on civil liberties and privacy should be caned and sent to prison.
#3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: FLL - Nice and Warm
Programs: TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,025
Another news article about the new gropes:
http://kstp.com/news/stories/S1707423.shtml?cat=1
http://kstp.com/news/stories/S1707423.shtml?cat=1
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MSP
Programs: Fallen Plats, ex-WN CP, DYKWIW; still a Hilton Diamond & Club Cholula™ R.I.P. Super Plats
Posts: 25,415
This begs the question: How soon will we quit flying? Probably after my wife complains about being fondled. It appears that we have reached the point in this country where exercising our freedom to travel will require either a strip search (w/ unknown levels of radiation) or a sexual assault.
Keep in mind that we've been traveling 2-5 times monthly. These alternatives are NOT something that we are going to put up with 4-10 times (or more when customs & terminal changes are involved) monthly.
Keep in mind that we've been traveling 2-5 times monthly. These alternatives are NOT something that we are going to put up with 4-10 times (or more when customs & terminal changes are involved) monthly.
Last edited by MikeMpls; Aug 22, 2010 at 4:17 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,558
Perhaps this person is an FTer! We just need more of these comments. Who knows what we'll be able to do!!
#6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
a comment from the CBS report
dontknowitall
Better a brush of the hand than a brush with death. The ACLU should be investigated and put on the do not list.
Better a brush of the hand than a brush with death. The ACLU should be investigated and put on the do not list.
#7
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,256
+1 this is never ending until people stop flying.
#8
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
Granted, that would do the trick.
The question is how to get a large percentage of the flying public to stop flying.
How much of a drop in passengers, ticket revenue, car rental and hospitality losses would tip the scales?
The resistance by the security proponents and their attempt at spin would be serious, and would need to be countered by a clear, articulate campaign.
Perhaps an internet based, distributed campaign so well orchestrated that countering it would be impossible.
Maybe focusing on one airline, then a second one, would help.
The question is how to get a large percentage of the flying public to stop flying.
How much of a drop in passengers, ticket revenue, car rental and hospitality losses would tip the scales?
The resistance by the security proponents and their attempt at spin would be serious, and would need to be countered by a clear, articulate campaign.
Perhaps an internet based, distributed campaign so well orchestrated that countering it would be impossible.
Maybe focusing on one airline, then a second one, would help.
#10
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,103
Granted, that would do the trick.
The question is how to get a large percentage of the flying public to stop flying.
How much of a drop in passengers, ticket revenue, car rental and hospitality losses would tip the scales?
The resistance by the security proponents and their attempt at spin would be serious, and would need to be countered by a clear, articulate campaign.
Perhaps an internet based, distributed campaign so well orchestrated that countering it would be impossible.
Maybe focusing on one airline, then a second one, would help.
The question is how to get a large percentage of the flying public to stop flying.
How much of a drop in passengers, ticket revenue, car rental and hospitality losses would tip the scales?
The resistance by the security proponents and their attempt at spin would be serious, and would need to be countered by a clear, articulate campaign.
Perhaps an internet based, distributed campaign so well orchestrated that countering it would be impossible.
Maybe focusing on one airline, then a second one, would help.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greater DC
Programs: UA plus
Posts: 12,943
The washingtonpost has the same article ... this is retaliatory BS for those refusing the scan. I am sorry to say that Amtrak continues to be more attractive than flying on most days Another sad period in US History thanks to DHS/TSA
#12
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,004
People are only going to stop flying if there is a good reason.
As the check point experience becomes more intrusive, there may be more incentive to find other modes of travel or use communication instead. Making those alternatives more attractive would be another factor. Tying current TSA trends to the downside is a necessity.
It would take a constant campaign with several prongs- disputing the need for intrusive searches, providing reasonable alternatives, and putting economic pressure on the whole travel industry to lobby for a new, more viable security solution.
#13
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,726
If your wife feels that she's been "fondled", call a cop and press sexual assault charges. Let's see how a TSO gets to keep his job once he's on the Level 1 list.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,953
One way to bring more attention to "enhanced pat downs" might be for the media to use the words "genitals", "crotch" and "breasts" rather than "sensitive areas" when describing an "enhanced pat down." Tell it like it is.
Another might be for anyone here who has opted out and taken the pat down, especially if it has been an aggressive pat down, to comment on any internet articles describing the pat down received.
Just a couple of thoughts.
Another might be for anyone here who has opted out and taken the pat down, especially if it has been an aggressive pat down, to comment on any internet articles describing the pat down received.
Just a couple of thoughts.