Go Back   FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Practical Travel Safety Issues
Use your Facebook account to securely log into this site! Click the logo to log in! Connect with Facebook

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 13, 10, 7:20 am   #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: UA 1K, NW Gold, AA PLT, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,306
TSA "encouragement" to use NoS at SEA

Ok, TSA now has a new approach to get you to use the NoS. This morning (about 20 minutes ago), I was going through the security here in Seattle, and one of the Barkers was saying the following not verbatum, but fairly close.

"We are using WBI here. It is perfectly safe and you have nothing to fear. You have the option to opt out of this type of screening. However, please be aware that you will be subjected to an intense pat down. Also please be aware that you will be waiting for a significant period of time to clear security if you choose to opt out. You may be waiting for a half an hour or more before we get to you. Therefore, I highly recommend that you use the WBI."

There was a line of folks who opted out waiting to be screened. And sure enough they were processing the WBI folks and not processing the opt outs. My line was next to the operationa NoS and therefore, i didn't have to go through the NoS or opt out option. However, in the 10 minutes i was in line I did not see a single person whatsoever in the opt out line get processed. while i saw about 10-20 people from the NoS line go through.

I think this may be TSA's new way to get us to use the NoS
MSY-MSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 7:50 am   #2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,037
The wait in line comes over as a passive way of saying "do you want to fly today?"
LessO2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 8:01 am   #3
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: JAX
Programs: National Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,337
If I were left standing in the box for more than 5 minutes without anyone being screened, I would call the airport police and report I was being unlawfully detained.
__________________
A proud member of the right wing conspiracy.
fs2k2isfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 8:05 am   #4
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 433
Or a passive way of saying "bad, BAD pax!"
__________________
Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat.
IrishDoesntFlyNow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 8:17 am   #5
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AA EXP, HHonors
Posts: 2,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by fs2k2isfun View Post
If I were left standing in the box for more than 5 minutes without anyone being screened, I would call the airport police and report I was being unlawfully detained.
Oooh, would that work? If TSA is employing a 'delay' strategy for opt-outs, this may need to be addressed on the Opt-out day website.

Can you bring a lawsuit against a federal employee if they lie by asserting that the machines are perfectly safe when there is scientific proof to the contrary? I will grant that millimeter wave is 'perfectly safe' according to scientific consensus, but there is a documented incremental cancer risk from receiving backscatter x-rays, especially for cancer survivors, elderly, children, and fetuses.
janetdoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 8:21 am   #6
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: JAX
Programs: National Executive, TSA Disparager Gold
Posts: 1,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by janetdoe View Post
Oooh, would that work? If TSA is employing a 'delay' strategy for opt-outs, this may need to be addressed on the Opt-out day website.

Can you bring a lawsuit against a federal employee if they lie by asserting that the machines are perfectly safe when there is scientific proof to the contrary? I will grant that millimeter wave is 'perfectly safe' according to scientific consensus, but there is a documented incremental cancer risk from receiving backscatter x-rays, especially for cancer survivors, elderly, children, and fetuses.
I'm not flying out of SEA, but if it happens next time I fly, I will not hesitate to call police.
__________________
A proud member of the right wing conspiracy.
fs2k2isfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 8:30 am   #7
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP Gold 75K, Hyatt Diamond, Hilton Gold, Hertz 5*, TSA-DSP Silver
Posts: 1,777
Thank you very much for this insight. I will actually be flying out of SEA in just a few hours. Unfortunately I'll have to add extra time to my schedule to account for this TSA nonsense.
baliktad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 9:09 am   #8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Edmonds, WA USA
Programs: UA, AS, HH, MR Elite; Mud Tier on BA, B6, FL, Hyatt. All bases covered.
Posts: 12,391
Quote:
Originally Posted by baliktad View Post
I will actually be flying out of SEA in just a few hours...
I have a 615am departure from SEA Tuesday morning. I'm guessing I should arrive at the airport by 400am to make time for this psychotic madness? Which means just staying up all night, I guess.
__________________
"You'll see a number of changes in the months ahead, and I think you'll be totally enraged." UA CEO Smisek, made accurate
BearX220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 9:11 am   #9
Moderator: Frontier Airlines EarlyReturns, Travel Safety,/Security, OMNI, OMNI/PR, and OMNI/Games
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: PDX
Programs: UA/YX non gratum anus rodentum
Posts: 13,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSY-MSP View Post
I think this may be TSA's new way to get us to use the NoS
'New' is relative. Regulars to this forum have been reporting this tactic for weeks now.
__________________
I haven't lost my mind......I sold it on eBay!!

The Poker
essxjay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 9:38 am   #10
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by fs2k2isfun View Post
If I were left standing in the box for more than 5 minutes without anyone being screened, I would call the airport police and report I was being unlawfully detained.
Correct.
doober is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 10:02 am   #11
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1
Check out the sticky thread up top about which airports have the machine. It says that the C gate checkpoint at SEA does not have the NoS. I will be flying out of there in a couple of weeks so I hope it's still true.
Cactus12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 11:01 am   #12
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,199
This may be a blessing in disguise. People are already weary of the TSA. Annoying them further brings more people to our side.
BubbaLoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 11:04 am   #13
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by essxjay View Post
'New' is relative. Regulars to this forum have been reporting this tactic for weeks now.
And now there are reports that TSOs are actively selecting cute women to go through the NOS.
__________________
"Keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." H.L. Mencken
IslandBased is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 11:12 am   #14
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: DTW
Programs: DL 0.22 MM, AA 0.34 MM, PC Plat Amb, Hertz #1 GC 5*
Posts: 6,995
Now this is getting interesting. The pax to pay will be those that either fail the WTMD and need a grope, or those that fail the ATI and need a grope.

If the secondaries are handled before the opt-outs, this is going to get real interesting.
__________________
"It can't be done" really means "I don't want to"... there's always a way.
DL's rule changes just improves my perl golf.
sbagdon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 10, 12:38 pm   #15
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: UA 1K, NW Gold, AA PLT, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cactus12 View Post
Check out the sticky thread up top about which airports have the machine. It says that the C gate checkpoint at SEA does not have the NoS. I will be flying out of there in a couple of weeks so I hope it's still true.
They all have them now. C-D checkpoint now has them as well. Totally rearranged as of about a week ago.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sbagdon View Post
Now this is getting interesting. The pax to pay will be those that either fail the WTMD and need a grope, or those that fail the ATI and need a grope.

If the secondaries are handled before the opt-outs, this is going to get real interesting.
That is exactly how it was getting done and what I observerd. NoS folks were getting their secondaries first. It is a passive agressive way to get folks to take the NoS.


Side note-- transiting IAH and all the machines were off.
MSY-MSP is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:31 pm.

Contact Us - FlyerTalk - Archive - Top



SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.