Flights went up over night
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,690
When there is an AA domestic sector at the start, you end up stuck with that flight type's 0kg allowance throughout.
Bear in mind that an international AA flight woudl have a baggage allowance. But that doesn't matter - as there is no such flight on the ticket - you are stuck with t e allowance of the first sector.
And bear in mind that the subsequent JL flights would each have a 2*23kg allowance - if only this wasn't overriden by the "0kg" introduced by the FMC rule.
In the JU case, despite what you were told by JU staff, the first sector is BEG-LHR, which comes with a 1*23kg allowance. JU does have flights with bigger allowances - BEG-JFK is one, just as in the AA example above, ORD-HND would have had a bigger allowance - but the baggage allowance is determined by the type of the first flight. Hence, in the JU case just as in that AA example, you get only the allowance applicable tothe first sector viewed in splendid isolation - which for the BEG-LHR sector is just 1*23kg.
If the second bag is a dealbreaker for you, then I would advise you to consult a human travel agent and make this issue the priority. Becuase I am 99% certain you are going to be charged a hefty fee for the second bag at check-in otherwise.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,690
you know you are completely ignoring that first marketing carrier applies throughout a whole ticket trip itinerary for flights who's destination is the USA?
what AA domestic sector in the beginning? he's flying FROM Beograd to the usa?
HE'S IN SERBIA IN THE BALKANS GOING TO THE USA
what AA domestic sector in the beginning? he's flying FROM Beograd to the usa?
HE'S IN SERBIA IN THE BALKANS GOING TO THE USA
Look again at the example.
THE ALLOWANCE AND FEES OF THE FIRST FLIGHT APPLY TO ALL SUBSEQUENT SECTORS.. Even in cases where the first flight HAS no baggage allowance, and subsequent sectors WOULD HAVE (without this rule in force). [0 free bags, 1st bag charged @25 FOR ALL SECTORS, despite those flights otherwise having a more generous free allowance]. This is why the example is headlined "YOU COULD END UP WITH BAGGAGE FEES ON ALL FLIGHTS". Because, unlike the Most Significant Carrier rule, this rule just replicates the allowance of the very first flight on all subsequent flights. If it's 0kg, that's what you get on all subsequent flights. If, as with JU BEG-LHR it's 1*23kg, that's what you get on all subsequent flights.
#18
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 5
Yes. I am aware of that.
Look again at the example.
THE ALLOWANCE AND FEES OF THE FIRST FLIGHT APPLY TO ALL SUBSEQUENT SECTORS.. Even in cases where the first flight HAS no baggage allowance, and subsequent sectors WOULD HAVE (without this rule in force). [0 free bags, 1st bag charged @25 FOR ALL SECTORS, despite those flights otherwise having a more generous free allowance]
Look again at the example.
THE ALLOWANCE AND FEES OF THE FIRST FLIGHT APPLY TO ALL SUBSEQUENT SECTORS.. Even in cases where the first flight HAS no baggage allowance, and subsequent sectors WOULD HAVE (without this rule in force). [0 free bags, 1st bag charged @25 FOR ALL SECTORS, despite those flights otherwise having a more generous free allowance]
If all flights are on a single ticket. if the first flight has a allowance of 2 and the final destination is the usa irregardless of connections and policies to the connections o. connecting flights. Serbias market takes effect. I'm sorry but you are blatantly ignoring this.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,690
The FMC rule (and the MSC rule) only applies to interline tickets, as the issue of "which of several conflicting baggage allowances applies?" only arises on such tickets.
If all flights are on a single ticket. if the first flight has a allowance of 2 and the final destination is the usa irregardless of connections and policies to the connections o. connecting flights. Serbias market takes effect. I'm sorry but you are blatantly ignoring this.
Stated again, there is no individual flight appearing on the ticket that would qualify for a 2*23kg allowance. BEG-LHR, although it "connects" to other flights, is still just BEG-LHR, and the marketing carrier of this flight will only grant a 1*23kg allowance for this first flight. This allowance is therefore carried over to all subsequent flights (though, in this case, there was never any question about baggage allowance, because each individual sector on BEG-LHR-YYZ-CMH only gets 1*23kg).
Yes, I know that the Air Serbia website says that for tickets between The US and Belgrade the allowance is 2*23kg. But remember - AA has a baggage allowance for US to Japan that is more than 0kg, and yet, in the example illustrated above, this was ignored and instead only the allowance of the first sector (0kg) was granted.
You must therefore explain why, in the present case, the "FMC" would lead to the provision of an allowance greater than that accruing to ANY of the individual sectors. (Again, the say-so of a JU employee who may not be aware of the rules or ever have actually considered this scenario, is far less convincing than the worked examples of the rules as shown inthat linked page)
#20
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 5
That's wrong.
The FMC rule (and the MSC rule) only applies to interline tickets, as the issue of "which of several conflicting baggage allowances applies?" only arises on such tickets.
And again, you are wrong. I realise you claim you spoke to a JU agent, but that doesn't mean that you were misinformed or that they misunderstood or just didn't know themselves. The first ticket on a BEG-LHR(JU)-YYZ(AC)-CMH(AC) only has a 1*23kg allowance. Yes, I know JU has an allowance of 2*23kg for BEG-JFK and for many other connecting itineraries; but, observing the FMC rule, you must look at the allowance that JU would attribute to just BEG-LHR - which is only 1*23kg.
Yes, I know that the Air Serbia website says that for tickets between The US and Belgrade the allowance is 2*23kg. But remember - AA has a baggage allowance for US to Japan that is more than 0kg, and yet, in the example illustrated above, this was ignored and instead only the allowance of the first domestic sector was granted.
You must therefore explain why, in the present case, the "FMC" would lead to the provision of an allowance greater than that accruing to ANY of the individual sectors. (Again, the say-so of a JU employee who may not be aware of the rules or ever have actually considered this scenario, is far less convincing than the worked examples of the rules as shown inthat linked page)
The FMC rule (and the MSC rule) only applies to interline tickets, as the issue of "which of several conflicting baggage allowances applies?" only arises on such tickets.
And again, you are wrong. I realise you claim you spoke to a JU agent, but that doesn't mean that you were misinformed or that they misunderstood or just didn't know themselves. The first ticket on a BEG-LHR(JU)-YYZ(AC)-CMH(AC) only has a 1*23kg allowance. Yes, I know JU has an allowance of 2*23kg for BEG-JFK and for many other connecting itineraries; but, observing the FMC rule, you must look at the allowance that JU would attribute to just BEG-LHR - which is only 1*23kg.
Yes, I know that the Air Serbia website says that for tickets between The US and Belgrade the allowance is 2*23kg. But remember - AA has a baggage allowance for US to Japan that is more than 0kg, and yet, in the example illustrated above, this was ignored and instead only the allowance of the first domestic sector was granted.
You must therefore explain why, in the present case, the "FMC" would lead to the provision of an allowance greater than that accruing to ANY of the individual sectors. (Again, the say-so of a JU employee who may not be aware of the rules or ever have actually considered this scenario, is far less convincing than the worked examples of the rules as shown inthat linked page)
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/other...cked-bags.html
you need to click on where it says between United States and Belgrade, use the site properly you just mismatched baggage policies and destinations. ill do it for you.
and then the money shot right under the diagram on air Serbia
Last edited by platoon; Sep 22, 2017 at 8:14 am
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,690
I cannot make it any clearer. If you don't believe or understand, that is fine. But I warn you - you are likely to be charged for a second bag.
Please come back and let us know what transpires.
Safe travels.
#22
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 5
Yes, I am aware of that, I have acknowledged that; but that is irrelevant when you are only travelling to LHR with JU and either the FMC or MSC rule applies.
I cannot make it any clearer. If you don't believe or understand, that is fine. But I warn you - you are likely to be charged for a second bag.
Please come back and let us know what transpires.
Safe travels.
I cannot make it any clearer. If you don't believe or understand, that is fine. But I warn you - you are likely to be charged for a second bag.
Please come back and let us know what transpires.
Safe travels.
I digress.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,690
If you transit Canada, you may also need a Canadian ETA or even a visa, unless you are a US passport holder, or unless you hold Canadian citizenship, residency or a visa that therefore obviates the need for such a transit ETA/visa. Holding "American papers" is not enough; if you transit Canada, you need to also meet Canadian requirements; if you need an ETA but don't have one, you won't be allowed to board your flight to Canada.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/helpcen...um=1044&top=16
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/helpcen...um=1044&top=16
Last edited by irishguy28; Sep 23, 2017 at 7:57 am
#26
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 22
If you transit Canada, you may also need a Canadian ETA or even a visa, unless you are a US passport holder, or unless you hold Canadian citizenship, residency or a visa that therefore obviates the need for such a transit ETA/visa. Holding "American papers" is not enough; if you transit Canada, you need to also meet Canadian requirements; if you need an ETA but don't have one, you won't be allowed to board your flight to Canada.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/helpcen...um=1044&top=16
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/helpcen...um=1044&top=16
and regarding our earlier topic:
Last edited by capljina614; Sep 23, 2017 at 11:43 pm
#27
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 22
@irishguy28 ???? cat got your tounge?